2 messages in this thread
Yeah, agreed. My basic idea was these would serve both purposes, help us
(animators) work together as a group, and also the materials could be used as
marketing/educational tools for our clients ( the attoomeone contacted me some time ago (Golden?) and talked about
standardizing.<<
I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about when you say
"standardizing", standardizing what?
>>If you need any help or further suggestions on you quest, let me kociation journal on forensic animation. The more folks
answer my questionaire, the more will be mentioned in the article, not to
mention you can submit some sample graphics that we can print in the article.
If you are interested, let me know, I'll e-mail you more info.
I'm not worried too much about competition either. How many forensic animators
are there per state, as compared to the number of trial attorneys? Seems like
there's going to be enough work to go around, for a while at least. Maybe if
we all work together, c some collective energy to start
up an association, maybe just a loose association of animators willing to work
together for the mutual benefit of all, at first? Any thoughts?
Best Regards,
Brandon
P.S. BTW, I have always enjoyed your articles in 3D-Artist magazey do seem
to be receptive to lawyers who can speak their language ("members of the
club"). Getting through to them is the hardest task for most animators. So
what's the answer? A law degree? Just kidding! . . .but it helps!
andy
<<Have you seen the questionaire I made regarding the article I am writing for
the local State Bar Association journal on forensic animation. The more folks
answer my questionaire, the more will be mentioned in the article, not to
mention you can submit some sample graphics that we can print in the article.
If you are interested, let me know, I'll e-mail you more info.>>
No I haven't and yes I would like more info.
The association sounds good and I will put some thought to it.
<<I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about when you say
"standardizing", standardizing what?>>
You know that's what I thought at first. It was a matter of control I guess.
Maybe he wanted to franchise (ouch). I'll try to find the correspondence.