CompuServe Thread

2 messages in this thread
#173471From: Jan 1, 1970 12:00 AM
Yeah, agreed. My basic idea was these would serve both purposes, help us (animators) work together as a group, and also the materials could be used as marketing/educational tools for our clients ( the attoomeone contacted me some time ago (Golden?) and talked about standardizing.<< I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about when you say "standardizing", standardizing what? >>If you need any help or further suggestions on you quest, let me kociation journal on forensic animation. The more folks answer my questionaire, the more will be mentioned in the article, not to mention you can submit some sample graphics that we can print in the article. If you are interested, let me know, I'll e-mail you more info. I'm not worried too much about competition either. How many forensic animators are there per state, as compared to the number of trial attorneys? Seems like there's going to be enough work to go around, for a while at least. Maybe if we all work together, c some collective energy to start up an association, maybe just a loose association of animators willing to work together for the mutual benefit of all, at first? Any thoughts? Best Regards, Brandon P.S. BTW, I have always enjoyed your articles in 3D-Artist magazey do seem to be receptive to lawyers who can speak their language ("members of the club"). Getting through to them is the hardest task for most animators. So what's the answer? A law degree? Just kidding! . . .but it helps! andy
#173835From: Gary M. DohanishJun 5, 1995 9:47 PM
<<Have you seen the questionaire I made regarding the article I am writing for the local State Bar Association journal on forensic animation. The more folks answer my questionaire, the more will be mentioned in the article, not to mention you can submit some sample graphics that we can print in the article. If you are interested, let me know, I'll e-mail you more info.>> No I haven't and yes I would like more info. The association sounds good and I will put some thought to it. <<I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about when you say "standardizing", standardizing what?>> You know that's what I thought at first. It was a matter of control I guess. Maybe he wanted to franchise (ouch). I'll try to find the correspondence.