CompuServe Thread

#Razor Pro on a 486?

5 messages in this thread
#174025From: Carlton NewtonJun 6, 1995 8:30 PM
I'm trying to design a lab for 3 visual art departments to use. We've got 3DS, 6-486's, 1 P-90 pentium, and a PAR. I'm concerned that if I put the PAR in the Pentium (which will be the most heavily used by our savy users for Photoshop) we will limit our ability to net render 3DS. I could put it in a 486 and use the Pentium as a slave renderer. Is Razor Pro on a 486 a ridiculous idea? (I'm not anticipating much video editing use by more than a few faculty over the next semester, mostly the PAR would be used for 3DS animations and capturing single frames of video for further manipulation.) (Oh yes, BTW, being an educational institution I can't wait for the next generation of anything, these funds were petitioned a year ago and the specifics of the request can't be changed. :*( ) Thanks for any ideas. Carlton
#174137From: Mike MorganJun 7, 1995 9:27 AM
>> Is Razor Pro on a 486 a ridiculous idea? << Carlton, The 486 will not give you an problems as long as you have enough RAM for Razor Pro to operate properly. You will need 24-32 megs of ram to do any kind of editing, you will need 32 megs to use TransJammer DVE's and 24 megs for RP out of the box. -Mike
#174234From: Carlton NewtonJun 7, 1995 6:52 PM
Thanks Mike, it looks like ram time for me :*). Carlton
#174370From: Dennis GoodJun 8, 1995 12:05 PM
Carlton – In our experience there is a definite performance hit when operating with RPro on a '496 vs. a Pentium. Additional RAM can mitigate the hit, but it's there nonetheless. Since Razor Pro has to render its transitions, the more potent the CPU, the faster you'll run. Compare your rendering speeds of your frames in 3dS for the Pentium vs. the '486s, and you should have an approximate performance benchmark .
#174437From: Carlton NewtonJun 8, 1995 6:56 PM
Thanks for the benchmark Dennis. It gives me something understandable to work with. Carlton