CompuServe Thread

ST506 and SCSI speed

3 messages in this thread
#188From: Supra CorpJul 13, 1988 8:44 AM
The chips are not pin compatible, plus they run at a different clock rate. Also, you are comparing apples and oranges. MFM is 5 mbit, RLL is 7.5 mbit, and ARLL is 10mbit. MFM,RLL, and ARLL only refer to the method of encoding the data bits on the hard drive. ST506/412 on the other hand, is a hardware standard for controlling a hard disk. This standard specifies what are the data lines, the control lines, and the needed voltage levels. Since a hard disk is a very dumb device, you need another processor to handle the data encoding/decoding, head positioning, ect. Next, you need a front end, some standard method of sending/receiving data. This would be your IBM bus, SCSI, or ESDI standards. So you now have the Adaptec AC2000, which is a ST506/412 -> IBM bus controller. The Adaptec AC4000, which is a ST506/412 -> SCSI controller. The Adaptec ???? which is a ST506/412 -> ESDI controller. And the Adaptec ??? which is a ESDI -> SCSI interface. SCSI and ESDI integrated drives combine several of the above processers into 1 processer. Thus cutting costs and form factors. I suspect that we will see ARLL mostly impelmented in the integrated drive format. [Mark]
#237From: Supra CorpJul 13, 1988 8:30 PM
Oppps, made a small mistake. The 2090 is not using the Adaptec SCSI chipset, they designed their own and from some source code we have seen, it looks like it was based on the Xebec S1410. [Mark]
#289From: John DraperJul 14, 1988 4:19 AM
The 2090 uses the Western Digital WD33C93-SBIC chip set for SCSI -larry