CompuServe Thread

#Animation to NTSC ?

14 messages in this thread
#35478From: Ed RochelleJun 28, 1990 9:25 PM
Hi' Does anyone have any thoughts on creating animation on the Amiga and outputting to a NTSC signal? Are the best results obtained by recording on to S-VHS? I have a PC system now and am thonking of getting into the Animation business and it looks to me that the Amiga is the way to go. What's the best software animation package? Thanks for any help … Ed…
#35484From: Pete GouldJun 29, 1990 1:09 AM
Ed, There is literally a TON of hardware and software geared toward this very issue! On the hardware end you need a device to take the Amiga's RGB video signal and transform it into NTSC composite, which is much easier to do on the Amiga because the video signal timing is identical to NTSC already. The most common such device, available through several manufacturers, is called a "genlock", because in addition to encoding Amiga graphics into NTSC it also synchronizes the Amiga to an external video signal and permits superimposing Amiga graphics over that signal. Or such a unit may be used in standalone fashion to encode the Amiga graphics for recording to video tape. The best unit I've seen personally is the SuperGen 2000S by Progressive Image Technology, marketed by Digital Creations in California. One of the designers of the SuperGen is a former Grass Valley engineer — if you're into the professional end of video, that should say something to you. The 2000S outputs in composite and Y/C 3.58 for SVHS and produces a true RS-170A broadcastable output. As to the rest of your question — what kind of projects are you planning to work on? Pete
#35502From: Ed RochelleJun 29, 1990 11:23 PM
Hi Pete, Thanks so much for the info. I have heard lots of good things about the SuperGen 2000 and will try to find a dealer to show me how it works. I have also heard of the 'Video Toaster' that's coming. Do you know anything about it? We are looking to create animations that can be sold to special event videographers to be included in their videos. Any feedback? Thanks again.. Ed…
#35525From: Pete GouldJul 1, 1990 12:08 AM
The Video Toaster is a four input video switcher / still store / special effects generator / character generator / digital video effects unit on a card. Note that the four inputs have to be synchronous and properly timed, e.g., if you are using playback decks as sources you need a timebase corrector for each tape source. There are two still store channels available, so in effect the switcher is a six-input switcher with two of the inputs being still frames. Stills are full television resolution in 16,000,000+ colors. Flips, tumbles, digital trails and such are elegant and smooth; however they have to be kept moving to look good. You can't use this device to create a 1/4 screen compressed box, like you'd see over a newscaster's shoulder during a news show, as the compressed image is not clean. As long as you're doing a tumble in or out, though, the audience will not see that as it is masked by the motion. I can't make many recommendations about event videography because I'm really not involved in that stuff — I swore off years ago. But I hope the Toaster info is of some use. I've seen it — some of the things it can do are pretty amazing. I use a $14,000 Microtime DVE that can't do some of the things the Toaster can. Pete PS – before you buy a Toaster, remember that if you're doing A-B rolling you will need TWO TBC's at $2000+ each in order to make the Toaster work.
#35550From: Ron LegroOct 19, 1993 5:10 PM
Yup, there is, but I don't know its name. Do a scan here in the libraries on WAV or sound or 8SVX. — Ron Legro from Milwaukee via AUTOPILOT (The only way to fly)
#35598From: John HortonOct 24, 1993 1:01 AM
Try AMISOX.LHA in lib 7, this area (AmigaArts). I think it converts .WAV. –>………………John
#35925From: <David L. Gold>Nov 10, 1993 8:12 PM
Will AMISOX convert Amiga samples to .WAV as well? <Dave>
#35997From: John HortonNov 15, 1993 11:58 PM
Dave, Sorry for not answering sooner, but yes it does convert iff to wav. I have it and it works pretty good. John.
#35498From: jeff brownJun 29, 1990 9:32 PM
Ed– there is some debate among video folks (a matter of preferences, it seems), but the best way to record to NTSC is going be either "D-2" (a digital format), 1" type C, M-2 (by JVC), or BetacamSP (by Sony). The cheapest of these is M-2, but the most common are 1" and BetacamSP (in the pro realm, anyway). Going down in quality from these machines, in roughly descending order is 3/4"SP, S-VHS, 3/4", Beta(consumer),and VHS is at the bottom of the list. A very good tech I know says the new JVC S-VHS pro series is better than 3/4SP, and worth looking into. I think a JVC S-VHS editing deck can be had for about $6000. For comparison, I got my industrial 3/4SP deck (a SONY 9850) for, I think, about $7000. These are the low end if you're serious. And compare that to about $35,000 for a BetacamSP editing deck (although the BetaSP is a much superior recording format). Be advised though, that even though the tape machine will probably be the weakest link in your system, whatever format you use, it won't be any better than the quality of the signal you start with. I have a SuperGen 2000S and am fairly happy with it. You should also check out the Magni and Neriki units. All of these will run $1500-$2000, I believe. Any learn how to use a waveform monitor and vectorscope, which is pretty simple– kind of like a 'light meter' for video signals. Buy them if you can (another $3000 for the pair), or do as I did and rent them to check the genlock you buy and set up your system. And then you can rent the scopes again to check things every once and a while (about a $50 charge). And with the Amiga.. it's not just video, it … it's and adventure (hehe)……..Jeff
#35501From: Ed RochelleJun 29, 1990 11:23 PM
Hi Jeff, Thanks so much for the information. I will look into all the infoyou have mentioned. I guess the dream machine is the BetacamSP. I'm just starting out and it's all new to me…Thanks again… Ed…
#35527From: Pete GouldJul 1, 1990 12:19 AM
Ed – Beta SP is nice, but the dream machine is the digital D2 format. Since it's digital, there's virtually no loss from generation to generation and you can make copies of copies of copies of copies of — well, you get the idea. This allows you to create layered animations where you keep playing back what you've got so far and pasting some new animation on top of it Of course that unit is something you would get instead of a new house <grin> Pete
#35569From: Ed RochelleJul 2, 1990 12:06 PM
Hi Pete, Thanks for the reply. I am using a PC now with a program called AutoDesk Animator. The way you spoke about layering seems to be what the AA program does when I make animations. Once I get the flic the way I want it(layered,etc.) I need to put it on video. I have been using a reg. vhs deck till now. Thought that s-vhs would be something to look into… Ed…
#35578From: Karl SparklinJul 2, 1990 4:54 PM
Ed, I've seen brief excerpts of stuff done on Autodesk Animator, and was surprised anything on the IBM would do even THAT well. How do you feel about it: does it do what you want? Karl
#35581From: Pete GouldJul 2, 1990 5:05 PM
Ed, You're underestimating what I'm talking about. The Amiga can easily outperform a PC running AA. What I'm describing is big budget network video, wherein various layers of animation are combined with each other and/or with live action imagery to produce what you see in, say, a movie-of-the-week opening. These decks run from about $80,000 – $160,000, and I mentioned them in more of a tongue-in-cheek manner than anything else. No computer — including the mainframes that produce some of the really high-level network stuff — can display those graphics in real time. I'm not trying to put down PC's, and I'm CERTAINLY not putting down the Amiga — I own both, after all, and use the Amiga regularly in production work. If you have not had a chance to see an Amiga in action with some of the really good graphics programs running on it, you owe it to yourself to do so. I wouldn't be surprised to see your PC and AA package in the "used equipment" ads after you do so… Anyway, SVHS is absolutely better than standard VHS, and arguably better than (non-SP) 3/4". HI-8 should be better than SVHS based on its specs, but I've not seen it in action, and there is a limited amount of gear available. Betacam and MII are next, then Betacam-SP, then 1", and D2 is probably at the top. I probably left something out somewhere which someone else will be good enough to insert in its rightful place on the list, and others might disagree with my ranking. None of which is really important, because as soon as you go up to 3/4-SP (which is just below Betacam) you're into machines that cost over $10,000 and so are priced above what most (any?) consumers can deal with. So for what you're doing, SVHS or Hi-8 are the formats to consider. Pete