CompuServe Thread

#Minor A3000 Problems

26 messages in this thread
#114801From: Chris CamilleriJul 28, 1990 6:24 PM
I'm having a little trouble with some files on my A3000 hard drive. In the S directory on my 2.0 system partition, there are 2 files with the same name, neither of which wants to be deleted or renamed (says "file not found"). Everything else is working OK so far, but I'm a bit concerned. What can I do (short of formatting) to get rid of them? Also, I'm ashamed to say, I've forgotten the boot procedure that lets you choose which partitions you want mounted. I thought it was booting with one mouse button down, but that isn't working. Can anyone help me out? Thanks!
#114830From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 28, 1990 11:32 PM
Chris, You say this is the s directory? If so, it's probably assigned as S: so here's the trick to fixing things: 1. cd to the root of the drive 2. makedir TEMP 3. cd S 4. copy the files you want from s into :temp 5. assign S: :TEMP 6. cd back to the root 7. DELETE :S ALL 8. mkdir :S 9. copy :temp :s all 10. assign S: :S 11. delete :temp all That should fix things up for you. The 1.3 vs 2.0 boot MUST be a COLD boot, it doesn't work on a warm boot. Yes, the mouse buttons must be held down when you power it up. Don
#114842From: Chris CamilleriJul 28, 1990 11:56 PM
Don, Thanks for the reply. I actually did pretty much what you told me already. The problem I'm having now is that the system won't let me delete two of the files in the old s directory; when I try, ADOS says "directory structure corrupt", and SID 1.06 says "object not found". Apparently the files aren't there, but the directory entries still are. These files, by the way, are two TxEd backup files, both named, appropriately enough, "TxEd.Backup". The system won't let me delete, move, rename, or in any way manipulate those files (or "non-files"). The second part of my question was not how to get 1.3 vs. 2.0, but how to get the OTHER boot option screen, which lets you choose which partitions will be mounted, regardless of which OS is running. Do you know how to get that? I could have sworn it was booting with ONE button down; I'm sure that worked with the beta 4 release. But since that was undocumented, maybe beta 5 took it away. Any insight on this? — CJC —
#114859From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 29, 1990 2:28 AM
Chris, No idea on the boot setup. I haven't played enough with a 3000 so know all the in's and out's of it. On those files…I've got a few ideas, but it'd require playing with the directory structure with a disk sector editor. Don
#114880From: Chris CamilleriJul 29, 1990 10:42 AM
Don, I figured I'd end up with a sector editor, but wanted to be sure I'd covered all the bases. Can you recommend a good one? — CJC —
#114937From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 29, 1990 9:06 PM
Chris, I haven't tried any sector editors on the latest release of FFS (which is what the 3000 runs with). Normally, I use SEC to fix header blocks and the like. What I'd do is look in both the directory header block, and it's hash extension block for entries that hashed to that filename. I'd look at those file headers and see what names are really on the files. If they're both the same, I'd use the editor to change the name of one of them slightly, hash the new name, and move the pointer in the directory block to the new offset. Don
#114951From: Chris CamilleriJul 29, 1990 10:46 PM
Don, Since I broke out in a cold sweat as I read your last message, I think I'll just reformat that partition. 😉 If I get up enough nerve to mess around with the directory structure, I may be back to you on this for some guidance. Right now, though, I'm fellin' pretty cowardly. Thanks again for the advice! — CJC —
#114985From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffJul 30, 1990 11:48 AM
I recommend chucking SID … I don't work on a 3000.. I think alot of programs like SID ansd SuperView will have directory errors.. probably because of the way the do BPTR clearing in a 32-bit environment or something gross like that
#115028From: Chris CamilleriJul 30, 1990 5:47 PM
SID has behaved reasonably well on my 3000. With the exception, that is of floppy disk access – which it won't do; the system crashes as soon as you try to access any floppy volume. For that reason alone, I've pretty much stopped using it. Can you recommend something similar which you think would be safer on a 3000? — CJC —
#115387From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffAug 2, 1990 12:18 PM
I've gon back to using PP&G's CliMate, which actually sucks. DUDE works, but is a bit overblown..I haven't tried newer PP&S dir utils or any of the other PD ones.
#114838From: John Sobernheim(TCR)Jul 28, 1990 11:55 PM
Chris, I had the same problem with a customers A3K (two files in s: with the same name)… I ended up re-formatting. Let me know if someone tells you what happened and how to fix it. Re: booting into wb_2.x: or wb_1.3:, hold down BOTH buttons from a cold boot. -John
#114845From: Chris CamilleriJul 29, 1990 12:06 AM
John, Temporarily I've creaed a new s directory, moved everything but the bad files to it, and renamed the old directory until I can figure out how to get rid of it. The files in question are TxEd backup files; maybe TxEd and 2.0 aren't as friendly as they first appeared? The other problem was not how to get the 1.3/2.0 option screen, but how to get the "which volumes to mount" option screen. As I mentioned to Don, in beta 4, a cold or warm boot with one button down got the volumes selector; perhaps that's gone away in beta 5. If so, too bad; that was a nice, if infrequently used, feature. — CJC —
#114852From: John Sobernheim(TCR)Jul 29, 1990 1:20 AM
Chris, Ah… I'd never seen that "which volume to mount screen", sorry for the bad advice. re: the bad files in s:… the one I had to deal with was startup-sequence. Sounds like you've got a good work around going, but, If you don't have too much customization going right now… you may want to get the re-format over with. It's not very painful when all you're doing is re-copying system files. -John
#114877From: Chris CamilleriJul 29, 1990 10:42 AM
John, Yeah, I imagine I'll probably do the format pretty soon – just being stubborn! — CJC —
#114854From: John Sobernheim(TCR)Jul 29, 1990 1:28 AM
Chris, BTW, which versions of KickStart/WorkBench are you running? -John
#114879From: Chris CamilleriJul 29, 1990 10:42 AM
The problem is under ADOS 2.0 beta 5. The 1.3 side of things is working without a hitch. — CJC —
#115019From: dan harrisJul 30, 1990 5:22 PM
WARM boot with BOTH mouse buttons held down Chris. Hope that is where you are trying to get to.
#115029From: Chris CamilleriJul 30, 1990 5:48 PM
Yup, that's it. Of course, now two more questions arise… 1) Can you get that screen from a 1.3 warm boot? I can only get it from 2.0. 2) Are all volumes available (i.e., Work:, WB_2.x:, AND WB_1.3:), or only Work: and the current OS's partition? — CJC —
#115051From: dan harrisJul 30, 1990 7:27 PM
Glad that was the sequence you were looking for. No, warm boot will not allow you to change dos versions. There is supposed to be a software program ,KICKRE.LZH, that will allow dos changes on the fly, but it doesn't work for me going from 2.0 to 1.3. It will allow me to go the other way on the fly though. I don't know if the program is bad, if I installed it wrong or if my version of kickstart and dos are incompatible with the program. I have version 34.5 ks and 34.32 wb (dos 2.3) and vesions 36.141 ks and 36.68 wb (dos 3.0). What are your versions? As far as I can tell you can only access the version of dos you are running in. i.e. if you are booted in 2.0 you can access only wb_2x etc.
#115076From: Chris CamilleriJul 30, 1990 8:38 PM
I've been playing with KICKRE.LZH, and it's working fine for me both ways. It basically mimics a cold boot, so if you want to go from 2.0 to 1.3, you need to run Reboot (or choose the menu selection, if you used KickMenu), and then immediately hold down both mouse buttons. If no buttons, it'll bring you to 2.0 every time. The only problem I had was that I had to set the Wait statement in my startup-sequence to 4, instead of the 3 the documentation recommends. My versions are 34.5 and 34.28 (1.3), and 36.65 and 36.10 (2.0). It looks like you've got a slightly more recent WB 2.0; does your Clock work right? Mine initially opens OK, but the two digital modes don't behave right; Digital 2 is bigger than it's supposed to be, and Digital 1 just doesn't look right. A small matter, but I used to keep Digital 1 in the menu bar all the time, and now it doesn't fit. By the way, I think you missed part of my last question. Can you get to that volume-selection screen from a warm boot in 1.3? It only works for me in 2.0. — CJC —
#115125From: dan harrisJul 31, 1990 12:07 AM
I'll try extending the wait time a couple seconds and see if that is the problem. I get a lemon yellow screen and the system hard boot loops for ever every time I try to REBOOT from 2.0. I haven't noticed if I can warm start into the volume selection screen or not, from 1.3, I'll check that out too. Yes I have a problem with my clock! My software clock runs at +290.33 % realtime. The damn thing really cooks! I haven't found anyone yet that can help me with it. The hardware clock is fine, a setclock load loads the software clock with the proper time but from that second on it runs in triple time. I haven't looked at the digital 1 and 2 programs yet, I'll check them out.
#115132From: John DraperJul 31, 1990 12:28 AM
Dan, The fast clock sounds like an 8520 problem, or perhaps the signal that clocks it (tick). -larry
#115320From: dan harrisAug 1, 1990 8:21 PM
Larry: Good to hear, now I have two of you that have the same fix for my problem. DOn Curtis was kind enough to answer my plea too.
#115124From: dan harrisJul 31, 1990 12:06 AM
Chris, I just read several message back that only the dos partition you are booted in mounts, you could edit the mountlist and startup-sequence of dos to include the other version, I suspect.
#115151From: Chris CamilleriJul 31, 1990 6:56 AM
Yeah, I never thought of that. That should work, I guess. I'm really persuing this issue not out of need, but because I had accidentally come across that screen quite a while ago, and then couldn't remember how to get to it again. I was afraid something evil was going on in my machine! — CJC —
#114857From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJul 29, 1990 2:21 AM
John, Read my reply (or give me a call) on how to fix it….it should work. Don