CompuServe Thread

#What is Chaos?

2 messages in this thread
#19653From: Tom MaynardJul 20, 1992 8:32 PM
I'll admit right at the outset, that I've seen -but not read- Gleick's book. And that frames my question fairly well…. My first exposure to "Chaos, the Software" was an ad in "Discover" magazine. The illustration accompanying the ad appeared to be a group of ray-traced orbs circling a larger orb, all with mandelbrot set fractal surface mapping. I'm a ray-tracer, and a fractal-landscaper, and this looked pretty nifty. My second exposure came in CIS' monthly magazine, and led to my third: downloading the .GIFs mentioned there. Now I'm confused. The .GIF's I got look like FRACTINT output. So, is Chaos just another fractal-painter (with maybe a better frontend)? Or is it more? How much more? (Yeah, I know, 60 bux more.) I snagged a copy of CRATERS (the code that didn't make the cut), and found that intriguing for about 15 minutes or so — is Chaos better than this? How much better? I'll make a deal: give me an honest answer to what Chaos is/does, and I'll buy/read the book. Fair? Is a Persistance of Vision/Vivid RayTracer, and FractInt Dabbler going to find value in Chaos? Thanks, Tom.
#19658From: Mark Middlebrook[AcadTM]Jul 20, 1992 9:43 PM
Tom: CHAOS: The Software comprises six modules for exploring some of the examples of chaos theory which James Gleick described in his book. The modules cover Mandelbrot (and related) sets, magnets and pendula, strange attractors like the butterfly-shaped Lorenz attractor, IFS fractals that generate ferns and other interesting shapes, "fractal forgeries" of landscapes and planets, and cellular automata. All the modules share a VGA-mode graphical interface which is most conveniently navigated with a mouse. They're fairly easy to play around with, yet quite "tweakable" for those who want to explore more deeply. I've used both CHAOS and FRACTINT a bit, and I like 'em both. I've also read CHAOS: The Book twice, and enjoyed it immensely both times. Haven't seen CHAOS: The Movie yet, though <g>. – Mark M.