PC BOYCOTT
2 messages in this thread
For any of us to argue about what is a fair profit or unfair is a
stupid and wasteful argument. All I'm saying is that I've seen some
huge and, what I would consider, ridiculous profit margins. I don't
claim to know it all about the economy. If I did, I would would be on
capital hill. Then again, maybe not (grin). Anyway, I chose this
field because I love it and no other reason. No matter what anyone
says in this thread, I am not bitter obout anything. I've accepted
the costs involved in what I do. Obviously or I'd be out of business.
I owe a lot to this industry. It has helped me make a very nice living
for myself.
These things being said, I still contend that many prices are
unreasonable and are not justified by operating, advertising, or
research & development costs. Who has more of a right to gripe about
them than me, the guy who's been paying them for the last six years.
The only thing that has angered me during this thread are some of the
people who have to shove a point in your face and mix a lot of
what-if scenarios in with it, completley straying from the actual
numbers of what we're talking about here.
I was simply agreeing with another fellow who was a little
flustered by the Risc processor scenario as of late. Although,
seriously, I'm sure I wouldn't boycott the PC industry. My God, there
goes everything I've worked for. I do believe, as consumers, that we
should constantly question situations like this and keep the pressure
on the manufacturers to keep the market fair and open.
Sorry Albert, but I'm a little blue in the face from all this.
Thanks for the convo!
>> Sorry Albert, but I'm a little blue in the face from all this.
I can relate to that. Just want to make the point that government fixes for
even real problems can leave everyone very ill. We have had at least 30 years
of federal "fixing".
Political plug: Pete Wilson for President in '96
(so he/we can rePete in 2000 <g>) — sorry Newt.