CompuServe Thread

Art or Data?

1 messages in this thread
#1090From: Doug WingerAug 5, 1988 5:30 AM
If you think photography is a 'literal capture of reality' and so does not qualify as art… Think about the choice of the point of view. Think about what is _not_ shown. Think about the change of contrast or color values. Think about the difference a change of focal length makes. Think about the introduction of lighting changes. Think about the purposeful distortions that can be introduced. Think of the elimination of colors in B&W… And we havent even gotten into what can be done the darkroom. One of the hardest things in photography is to _make_ it a literal representation. Most of the time and technique in photography is spent trying to eliminate the factors that make the final image 'different' from the original- or introducing them to get a certain desired effect. It may be less time-consuming than, say, painting in oils, but the creative aspects may require more intensive planning.