CompuServe Thread

#SW Copy Protection

31 messages in this thread
#6562From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 17, 1988 5:57 AM
As chairperson of an Amiga SIG, I wouldn't imply that every user group has a 'club expert' to help pirates break SW & HW. Since the group I belong to is incorporated, we would be liable if any pirating goes on at our meetings. We set an example for the members and enforce the rules: No Marauder et.al. during any meeting. If it can't be copied by diskcopy then it ain't allowed. If a person has a legitimate need then he must approach the librarian, explain the circumstances and let him do the copy. -Greg
#6619From: Tom GowdykAug 17, 1988 3:11 PM
I am the President of of Amiga club here in Vancouver (Panorama – Pacific Northwest Amiga Association). We recently amalgamated with the Commodore Computer Club giving us just over 600 members. We average between 150 to 200 members per meeting (2 meetings per month) at which we distribute normally 2 disks of PD software per meeting. We also do not condone piracy of any kind, however we do use Marrauder to copy the disks since it allows us to dump an entire disk into memory and then dump it out to 3 or 4 drives at a time. Without Marrauder, we just would not be able to do the copying during the time of the meeting. By the way, we usually just barely finish copying peoples disks by the end of the meeting, and that is with at least three machines running 3 drives at a time. I suppose the point I am trying to make, is that just because someone is using Marrauder, does not mean that they are pirating. Until something better comes along, now that Marrauder is no more, we will continue to use it. Tom Gowdyk 75026,3436
#6643From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 17, 1988 5:47 PM
If your _club _librarian_ and his assistants want to use Marauder, fine. We do too. But it is taboo for our rank and file. If an individual member wants to copy something then he better be able to do it with diskcopy. Policy is that if caught they are warned the first time. The second time they WILL turn their machine off for the remainder of the meeting. Beyond that, they will be removed from the meeting. We have lost a number of members to this policy. This is an act of faith we perform for the local dealers who give our members 25%-30% discount off of list. They have told us that if we were to be found pirating then they would withdraw support, among other things. -Greg
#6779From: Tom GowdykAug 18, 1988 3:29 AM
Wow, 25 to 30% off software. We only get a 5% discount for members. There is a difference there too. Members of the executive do all the copying for everyone, rather than having members all bring in machines. Our meetings are held in a lecture amphitheatre and we tend to do the meetings as presentations and demonstrations. We do however have workshop meetings where everyone is welcome to bring their machines and sit down and work out problems. We are hoping after our election of new executive in October, to start up seminars on various packages like Pro-Page, Word Perfect, Excellence etc. Tom Gowdyk
#6803From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 18, 1988 5:40 AM
Remember I said 25%-30% off List. The public gets 15%-20% at most stores here. -Greg
#6645From: Jim OgilvieAug 17, 1988 5:49 PM
Tom… Have you seen our information/messages on the Amiga Friendship Day? Hope to see you and your group get involved..it is a very worthwhile event. For more information, there should be a file in the file transfer area, the News and Rumors section, which explains the event. If you require any further information, please feel free to send me mail. Jim
#6780From: Tom GowdykAug 18, 1988 3:29 AM
Jim. Two members of our executive were in Chicago for Amiexpo and brought back all the information. We are trying to work out something now, to get involved with it. Tom Gowdyk
#7011From: Jim OgilvieAug 19, 1988 6:45 AM
Tom… Thats great news. Please, keep me informed! Thanks.. Jim
#6722From: Betty ClayAug 18, 1988 12:03 AM
Tom, you can do that same copying without using Marauder. As a matter of fact, we have found that sometimes Marauder tries SO hard that it copies errors and folks get bad disks. We use DFC (from Fish#131). It copies only unprotected things, but will store in memory and make up to four copies at one time in a similar manner to Marauder. A more recent copy program, on Fish#139, is called TurboBackup. It will also make up to four copies at one time. Betty
#6783From: Tom GowdykAug 18, 1988 3:43 AM
Great, we will have to give those a try. We have only just gotten the latest Fish disks in, so we will have to give it a shot next meeting. Thanks for the info. Tom Gowdyk
#6742From: Jon BryanAug 18, 1988 1:10 AM
I called Discovery yesterday because Brain File 10 won't copy the newest version of "Dark Castle." My first copy destroyed itself while trying to write a high score to disk, so I wanted to make a backup of the second. Discovery told me that there would be another brain file "in two or three months." Why are you saying that "Marauder is no more"?
#6784From: Tom GowdykAug 18, 1988 3:43 AM
We were informed up here in Canada that Discovery had dropped production of Marrauder due to their contract with Taito. It seems Taito did not like the idea that discovery was making a product capable of breaking protection schemes. I also just read about this in either Amazing Computing or Amigaworld, can't remember which. Discovery was talking about a discount on their VIP virus protection program to registered users of Marrauder to make up for its demise. Tom Gowdyk
#6818From: Henry ColonnaAug 18, 1988 8:38 AM
Jon, there hasn't been a Marauder brain file in months! Marauder is practically worthless. It doesn't copy a single new thing any more, and hasn't for awhile. Why Discovery doesn't say THEMSELVES that Marauder is dead, I don't know. They should just admit the fact.
#6907From: Jon BryanAug 18, 1988 8:49 PM
What is a good copy program, Henry? I really _hate_ not having backups.
#6930From: Henry ColonnaAug 18, 1988 10:11 PM
Unfortunately, nothing that I know of right now. I think that Mirror was already behind, and trompled by Marauder when it was useful. There is something called Project D, but I know nothing about it.
#6946From: Black Belt SystemsAug 18, 1988 10:58 PM
Marauder is a very good copy program; if that's what you need. It's fast, and it's reliable. Those who actually own the program know that it copies 100% per cent reliably using the "verbatim" mode. Many people leave it in the Analytical mode when doing straight copies, and that can introduce all kinds of problems. I would recommend it 100% for your personal use for backup, and for duplication, it's very handy, with that write multiple disks from a memory image of the disk (if you have enough memory). The fact that it will no longer (supposedly) copy new protection schemes bothers me not at all. First of all, I personally won't buy copy protected software, so that's no problem. And second of all, no one needed Marauder to break that stuff anyway. Your neighborhood hacker does it anyway. I wouldn't worry too much about Henry's comment, there. –Ben–
#7133From: Jon BryanAug 20, 1988 12:50 AM
Thanks, Ben. I have Brain File 10, you're right about it working well, and I'll certainly use it anyway. I just wish it would back up "Dark Castle" for me, since I'm not about to take the time to figure out the copy protectio
#6754From: Black Belt SystemsAug 18, 1988 1:57 AM
So, that means you _do_ allow copying of WP, PCLO, Scheme, Excellence, SuperBase, Designtext, and etc ad nauseum? What in the world does marauder have to do with it? Software theft occurs either way, CP has not a darn thing to do with it. I _suspect_ that your group pirates as much as any other group – if not, great – but I doubt it. You may not be aware of it, they usually take great pains to exclude those who dissaprove from the "inner circle of thieves", but it's there, none the less. As for CP, If there's an unbreakable scheme, I've never heard of it – nor do I expect to. CP starts out with something broken before it leavves the manufacturer… The reasonaing behind it. –Ben–
#6801From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 18, 1988 5:39 AM
Of course we don't allow copying of non-copy protected software, but it is much harder to control. The officers keep an eye out for copying of any type. We can't be everywhere (We're not Big Brother). I know for a fact that several pirate-types have left the user group due to this policy. Again, our policy is an act of good faith toward the various dealers who support the group. They come in and are allowed to give a short sales pitch and often donate two or three titles which are given away by drawing. They look around and see what's going on. Appearances are everything. I'd rather have them see our membership showing off 'Boingthrows' rather than having them seeing and hearing Marauder, even though most of those same dealers sell it. However, if people come together at a meeting and decide to go to their homes and have group copy session, then that's their business! My responsibility ends the moment the meeting is over. If I'm visiting at a member's home and I see they have an illegal copy of something, I am not going to say: 'Bad member, Bad!' and then call the author, police or anyone else. It is their personal matter. If you want to guarantee that software will not be pirated, then build include the cost of a 24 hour security guard in your software. I'm sure that it won't be illegally copied then: "Hallo, Ich bin der Himmler Protektion Kompanie, und vee are chekking an unser softvare!" 🙂 🙂 -Greg
#6842From: Vic WagnerAug 18, 1988 12:59 PM
We attempt to control software theft at our general meetings by not allowing copying of _any_ kind. As for your 'responsibility ending' when the meeting ends, I consider that to be a cop out. It is _every_ citizens duty to report crime whenever/wherever it is encountered. Ignoring the situation comes _very_ close to condoning it. I know it's difficult to be a _crusader_ and to bash software theft (people will begin to think you're a little off your rocker), but as I've said before, the answer is education. If WE do NOT educate whenever opportunity presents itself, then WE are not doing our part.
#6933From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 18, 1988 10:18 PM
Good. The next time you speed on the highway report yourself to the police and ask for a ticket. I could get legal and imply that because the pirates make contacts at your meetings then the club is an accessory to the crime just as the bar owner who sold beer to a person who goes out and kills with his car cause he was drunk. Prosecute the satellite TV people. People who tape TV shows and loan them to their neighbors. People who put leaded gas into a car with a catalytic converter, etc. To you, a developer, things are white and black. Its legal or illegal. Theft or non-theft. To me there is a considerable amount of grey in between: Should you prosecute a member whose Workbench disk goes bad and 1Ub member makes him a copy? Technically, Yes. Morally, No. All a club can do is take a stand: A moral position on copying. It's been eight months since we instigated our no-Marauder policy. I have yet to catch anyone copying commercial software at one of our meetings. I'm sure it has gone on, but I haven't seen it. I have seen people bring stuff that I know that they couldn't have purchased. Even if they told me they copied it illegally, I could do nothing. That is heresay evidence and to file charges, I would have to actually see them copy software they did not own. Finally, no one is the perfect citizen. I do not and never have condoned <continued>
#6934From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 18, 1988 10:18 PM
<continuation> pirating. Period. But I am not going to act like the Gestapo either. You want to really stop copying then ban Amigas at your user group meeting. -Greg ps: you're lucky I use Whap! as I was really hot at first!
#7040From: Vic WagnerAug 19, 1988 2:10 PM
I counted on you using Whap! <grin> First……when I speed, I do it in public, for all people to see. I do NOT go speeding around where no one can see, nor to I try to hide the fact. I seem to collect one speeding ticket every couple of years, generally for going 65 MPH on a highway (California freeway) designed to be driven safely at 100 MPH. Second…..I never said that it was a black-white issue. My stand as a developer/publisher is rather lenient. I believe we (Metadigm) have made it quite plane that our current charge for updates (which is $5 to put the latest version on _your_ original disk) is just to handle the administrative costs and return shipping. We have told people in the past, that if they have a later version than their friend/associate/whatever then to feel free to copy the latest version onto their friend's original disk. This will NOT be the case for our NEXT update of MetaScope which will be a MAJOR upgrade. We will be asking ALL MetaScope customers to send in their original disks to receive this update (and the new manual). So your case of someone who is 'known' to have a legal copy of a program which has been damaged/lost, I go with what I believe is the 'moral' answer and would probably help them obtain a replacement copy. Thirdly, as president of the local user's group, I feel it is my duty to mention (from time to time) that software theft is wrong. I do it at meetings and have, of course, taken some flak for it. The 'anti-piracy' clause was already in the written rules for the running of the club before I <continued>
#7041From: Vic WagnerAug 19, 1988 2:11 PM
<continuation> ever became associated with it. It was put there by the founders, non of whom are developers. I concur with that stand. It was a point which I established _before_ I joined the club. P.S. I was not picking on _you_ when I made the comments, and I was hoping that more people would jump when I sent the last message <sigh>. Apathy, IMHO, is one of the reasons we still have the problem.
#7065From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 19, 1988 7:01 PM
Since we are leaving our dirty laundry out for everyone to see I will confess that my position on Workbench1.3 was made for the same reasons: to stimulate discussion on the topic. I am not as hard line as what I portrayed. -Greg
#7410From: Terry CarrollAug 21, 1988 10:21 PM
Taking a public stand as an officer in a users' group is one of the best things to discourage piracy. By simply stating the position at meetings and informal get togethers, you can begin the conversation that software piracy is wrong. While this won't do it all, the conversation must be begun before it will be heard. -tc (VP, Cleveland Area Amiga Users' Group)
#7042From: Black Belt SystemsAug 19, 1988 2:11 PM
P.P.S……please do NOT infer from my P.S. that I believe _you_ are apathetic. 5'PALX'h90W</+Ko>^LtPb8-Aug-88 21:00:27 I wonder if you were at their home, and you saw a stolen diamond necklace, if you would call the authorities. Or a woman tied to a chair, bruised and bleeding. Where do you draw the line? –Ben–
#6789From: Vic WagnerAug 18, 1988 3:47 AM
Could I prevail upon you for copies of both your "Articles of Incorporation" and your "by-Laws". I forsee the time when Amiga Friends must incorporate and dread the writing of these two documents from scratch. If they are NOT in machine readable form, let me know, and we can work out some arrangement to pay for shipping, copying, etc.
#6802From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 18, 1988 5:40 AM
Vic, it may take some time. We are incorporated as a not-for-profit organization in the state of Ohio and that was handled by a lawyer-friend and it may take several weeks to get ahold of the right people. I do have a copy of our club conststution, but only a printed copy. (I have an OCR at work, maybe it'll read it). -Greg
#7034From: Betty ClayAug 19, 1988 11:21 AM
My club has strict rules about piracy, too, Greg. There is nothing in our library that is commercial. Not even programs typed in from magazines, since some magazines object to that. I think most clubs have such rules. Of course, we cannot control what members do outside club meetings and make no attempt to. Almost every club DOES have someone who prides himself on his ability to break protection schemes, but not during club meetings.
#7064From: Gregory B. TibbsAug 19, 1988 7:01 PM
I agree with you 100% Betty. I am done on the subject. 🙂 -Greg