CompuServe Thread

#Earthquake in SE/PA

18 messages in this thread
#117759From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 17, 1994 4:02 PM
FM> I think we just had a earthquake in south east PA ,about an hour ago FM> I felt a slight movement and just now I REALLY felt a 5 to 10 second FM> movement. There were two PA quakes reported on the noon news here in Tucson – as an afterthought to the CA quake news, of course. If anybody is interested in official USGS reports of stuff like that, they are often loaded onto my BBS within 1-2 days of events. I am willing to post them here if asked to, but I don't want to waste the bandwidth if nobody wants to see them. I expect to see a LOT of traffic in the next few (post-Northridge earthquake) days <sad grin>. Hope everybody _you_ know made it through – I have an on-line friend who works for LA County HazMat who hasn't been on-line since this morning at least….. Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona * TANSTAAFL * Seismology meeting adjourned by a motion from the floor!
#117774From: Mark E DeardorffJan 17, 1994 6:08 PM
Considering the power outages (200,000 plus homes) I doubt you'll hear from him soon. Down here in San Diego nothing of import occurred other than the obligatory political grandstanding. I hate politicians! Mark
#117874From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 18, 1994 11:05 AM
MED> Considering the power outages (200,000 plus homes) I doubt you'll MED> hear from him soon. I've heard 400k to 500k, but even so, but it would be nice to know …. MED> Down here in San Diego nothing of import occurred other than the MED> obligatory political grandstanding. I hate politicians! A few taglines: POLITICS (n) poly (many) + tics (blood sucking parasites). Politicians & diapers should be changed often & for the same reasons What this world needs is more unemployed politicians!! Taxachusetts has the best politicians money can buy. Lawyer: the larval form of Politician Crime does not pay . . . . as well as politics. Bedfellows make strange politicians. An honest politician is one who, when bought, stays bought. After the lawyers are all dead, kill the Politicians! But if it weren't for the politicians, we might all be kowtowing to the feudal lords or crime bosses. Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona
#118005From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 19, 1994 1:44 PM
MED> Considering the power outages (200,000 plus homes) I doubt you'll hear MED> from him soon. Actually I heard from him yesterday. Seems his area wasn't affected too badly, although for a short time he couldn't get through to CIS. I think things are much _better_ there than the national media would have us believe. Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona
#118055From: Mark E DeardorffJan 19, 1994 9:56 PM
Being a proponent of liberty you also understand the nature of news sales. If a news organization went about reporting on houses that *didn't* fall they would soon be selling something else. I am a structural engineer (besides being a radical Whig) and can state that things *are* pretty bad up there. Not that I think the government should pay for repairs. I am not so zealous, though, that I don't mind underwriting low interest loans. These people (me included since I live in San Diego) must accept the fact that they have assumed some risk by living in an area of seismic hazard. Which leads to the subject of earthquake insurance. I consider it a large scale ripoff. The deductibles exceed $10000. Self-insurance would probably as good or better considering the low probability of damage to individual homes exceeding the deductible by more than the future value of the premiums. Modern homes if constructed of wood with plywood or particle board shear walls offers excellent energy dissipation and stiffness. Most people should self insure. Mark
#118109From: Doug MitchellJan 20, 1994 8:07 AM
Hi, Mark– I figure that is good advice about self-insuring against earthquakes. People should note that does not simply mean go without insurance – to do it right implies setting some money aside in a shaky-day fund, perhaps the money you would otherwise have paid for quake insurance. –Doug
#118134From: Mark E DeardorffJan 20, 1994 1:58 PM
I have self-insured for years by taking ski trips with the money! Not a great idea. Now that I am an adult, at age 40, I can begin to act responsibly. (Before my kids grow up like me!) Mark
#118155From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 20, 1994 7:36 PM
MD> Being a proponent of liberty you also understand the nature of news MD> sales. If a news organization went about reporting on houses that MD> *didn't* fall they would soon be selling something else. Short-term you're right. Long-term, though, I tend to go to the news source which reports (my perception <g>) of the Truth. Network news is falling down big-time here IMO. And since govt. policies to spend our tax money end up being based on the mass media, this _is_ a problem. MD> I am a structural engineer (besides being a radical Whig) and can MD> state that things *are* pretty bad up there. Not that I think the MD> government should pay for repairs. I am not so zealous, though, that MD> I don't mind underwriting low interest loans. I do. Which is why the govt. shouldn't be doing it. If the govt. didn't do it then people like you could band together voluntarily and pool your money in a private charity to support this particular cause that you believe in. I'll volunteer my charity money where _I_ think it belongs, thank you very much. MD> These people (me included since I live in San Diego) must accept the MD> fact that they have assumed some risk by living in an area of seismic MD> hazard. Which leads to the subject of earthquake insurance. I MD> consider it a large scale ripoff. The deductibles exceed $10000. MD> Self-insurance would probably as good or better considering the low MD> probability of damage to individual homes exceeding the deductible by MD> more than the future value of the premiums. You pays your money (or not) and you takes your chances. I feel sorry for those who chose to live with no insurance, but they chose to live there and put their money into other things, like a nicer house than they could live in otherwise, or better cars or more meals at restaurants or whatever. There's always Chapter 7 for those who made these bad gambles. If'n I had to live in CA, _I'd_ sure consider the $400-$500/year a reasonable expense, but then I'm a geologist by training <g> and I carry lots of insurance on the rest of my life too. Same deal applies to rebuilding houses at government expense for those without flood insurance in Arizona last winter or in the midwest. Why the h*ll should all of us be forced to pay for the mistakes of a few in choosing where they live? (Sorry, this is a sore spot on my libertarian hide!) Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona * Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without Hell *
#118199From: Mark E DeardorffJan 20, 1994 11:52 PM
You're right about loans. The government shouldn't be a substitute for common sense and responsibility. Welfare is the new opiate. I don't think you'ld really consider that money worth it considering the true liklihood of damage exceeding the deductible – they all exceed $10000. There are a few places where it may have some value but, in general, it is a low risk, high profit product of the insurance companies. Mark
#118256From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 21, 1994 11:22 AM
MD> You're right about loans. The government shouldn't be a substitute MD> for common sense and responsibility. Welfare is the new opiate. Yeah, and "provide for the general welfare" has been extended to "provide for individual's welfare" without thinking about where the incentive to provide for yourself goes when charity becomes a "right". MD> I don't think you'ld really consider that money worth it considering MD> the true liklihood of damage exceeding the deductible – they all MD> exceed $10000. There are a few places where it may have some value MD> but, in general, it is a low risk, high profit product of the MD> insurance companies. Maybe so, but for the Ins.Cos., it's closer to an all-or-nothing situation. Not like Major Medical insurance, where there will be a certain statistical number of payouts out of the pool of insured people. When a quake (or other natural disaster) hits, the entire area has large losses. Witness Hurricane Andrew in Dade County, Florida. What really frosts _me_ is the Feds going in and rebuilding Homestead with tax $$$ when it was slated to be closed. Any business working with money it was responsible for would have seized that opportunity to walk away instead of sinking $$$ into a wasted cause….but the Feds don't care about taxpayer pockets, they're infinitely deep <g>. I carry MM ins, BTW, and pay my own small medical expenses as part of living. But I don't want to be wiped out in the event of a major medical expense. Likewise I'd be willing to lose 10k to 20k of my equity in order to pay off the balance of my loan in the event of a quake. But many people would rather NOT take responsibility for their decisions (a) in borrowing money for houses; or (b) in choosing to live in dangerous areas (floodplains, barrier islands, earthquake-prone areas). Instead they'd rather defer to the banks who loaned the money to them. On the flip side of this coin IMO any bank which would permit a mortgagor to borrow without enough insurance is asking for trouble itself <grin> so maybe Chapter 7 isn't such a Bad Thing for people who borrowed from such banks – the banks will pay for _their_ poor judgment. Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona * TANSTAAFL * I'd rather be dead than domesticated. Poul Andersen
#117792From: Dave VestJan 17, 1994 8:02 PM
Yes, I would like to see more seismo information on CIS. Can you give us the number of your BBS? The Geo Survey BBS in Menlo Park has only had 3 logins all day! I'm beginning to wonder where evewryones at!
#117813From: Doug MitchellJan 17, 1994 10:00 PM
Hi, Dave– Welcome to the forum/section! In this forum's library is Angus' upload of GEOINF.ZIP about the GeoInfo network and INTERN.TXT about the rocks-and-fossils mail-list on the Internet. –Doug
#117873From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 18, 1994 11:05 AM
DV> Yes, I would like to see more seismo information on CIS. There were about 40 posts in the GeoEvents echo last night on the CA quake, I'll ZIP 'em and post em here as CQKJ18.EXE (a self-extracting ZIP containing messages received by Jan. 18, 1994). I'll try to continue to post CQKJxx.EXE for each day or so. DV> Can you give us the number of your BBS? The Geo Survey BBS in Menlo DV> Park has only had 3 logins all day! I'm beginning to wonder where DV> evewryones at! GeoApplications Precambrian BBS: 602-881-5836, 2400-14,400 24 hrs. There was only one post on the PA quake, so I'll include it here in this message: Origin: GEOAPPS – 0005 – GeoEvents To: ALL From: TED SMITH Date: 01/17/94 Re: Pennsylvania earthquake ———————————————————————— To: ALL Subject: Pennsylvania earthquake PHILADELPHIA (UPI) — Two earthquakes hit eastern Pennsylvania on Saturday night, and one was the worst to rock the state since records have been kept. The two minor earthquakes were centered near Reading, Pennsylvania, about 85 miles northwest of Philadelphia. The first hit at 7:43 p.m. EST and registered 4.0 on the Richter scale, according to the National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colorado. The second came at 8:49 p.m. EST and measured 4.6. "As near as we can tell," the second quake was the worst in the state's history, John Minsch, a geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said Sunday. There may have been worse temblors before the Richter scale was developed, he said, but there are no reliable records. No injuries and only minor damage, such as cracked walls and road surfaces, were reported. The tremors were felt as far south as Washington, D.C., and as far north as New York City and even Toronto. Police departments throughout eastern Pennsylvania reported numerous phone calls from worried residents, alarmed by the shaking china, falling pictures, and other signs of the geological disturbances. — * QMPro 1.51 * I poured Spot remover on my dog, and now he's gone. * TNet 3.90 = GeoInfo * CDMG ONLINE * Sacramento, CA * (916) 327-1208 <*> Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona
#117937From: Doug MitchellJan 18, 1994 10:40 PM
Hi, Angus– Thanks, those sound like some dog-gone good and johnny-on-the-spot uploads, which will be most welcome! But as EXE's they will be frustrating for users of Macs and other sorts of computers. ZIP and ARC are more widely usable forms. There is a small freeware ARCA.ARC for ARChiving files (and freeware ARC-E.COM for extracting it and other ARCs) in IBMSYS forum's library – that ancient ARC format may not be the most efficient, but can be dearchived on the widest variety of computers. –Doug
#118006From: Angus Scott-FlemingJan 19, 1994 1:45 PM
DM> Thanks, those sound like some dog-gone good and johnny-on-the-spot DM> uploads, which will be most welcome! But as EXE's they will be DM> frustrating for users of Macs and other sorts of computers. ZIP and DM> ARC are more widely usable forms. There is a small freeware ARCA.ARC DM> for ARChiving files (and freeware ARC-E.COM for extracting it and DM> other ARCs) in IBMSYS forum's library – that ancient ARC format may DM> not be the most efficient, but can be dearchived on the widest DM> variety of computers. OK, I just uploaded a CQKJ19.EXE, with last nights messages, too. I was doing _you_ a favor by uploading things as EXEs since you don't have PKZIP 2.04 yet. Forgot about (ignored?) those poor old Mac owners. I'll re-send CQKJ18 and J19 as .ARCs made with some form of archiver and future ones will be .ARCs. I registered PKPAK 3.61, if that's not OK I guess I'll have to find ARCA somewhere but I don't really want to <grin>. Yours in freedom, -=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=- GeoApplications Tucson, Arizona * TANSTAAFL * Thesaurus: Ancient reptile with a vocabulary.
#118047From: Michael SternbergJan 19, 1994 9:21 PM
Not only Mac owners, but Amiga owners such as me, as well. 😎 M
#118127From: Rick Needham/SYSOPJan 20, 1994 12:40 PM
Angus:: The files that you uploaded the other day have been downloaded an average of 8 times! Thanks/Rick Needham/SYSOP ps: I'm giving you some "publicity" in our opening bulletin.
#118459From: Doug MitchellJan 22, 1994 3:59 PM
Hi, Angus– I have read CQKJ18 with great interest and will download 19 and 20 on this pass; thanks! –Doug