CompuServe Thread

#REXX for Windows???

8 messages in this thread
#42012From: Anthony RamirezJul 29, 1994 11:43 AM
Does anyone know if there is a REXX package in Windows or Windows NT? or, Is there a commercial 3rd party REXX package for Windows or NT? I know of a package that they want to port to Windows and was wondering if the AREXX port it has will be useable in the Windows or NT version. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#42015From: Kevin SangwellJul 29, 1994 4:43 PM
Don't know about Windows or NT, but I think it's in OS/2. Kevin Flying AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#42017From: Bob ChapmanJul 29, 1994 10:19 PM
Anthony – As already noted, OS/2 comes with REXX. In addition, Quercus Systems (GO PCVENA, S11/Quercus Systems) has Personal REXX for DOS, for OS/2, and for Windows. I have and use Personal REXX 3.0 for DOS and find it very satisfactory — although, under MSDOS, it can hardly match the seamless performance of Bill Hawes' ARexx and WSHell running under AmigaDOS — but then what could? 🙂 You can get further information of Personal REXX from either: Charles Daney [Quercus] 75300,2450 – the owner or Stan Murawski 70444,55 —— REC ——
#42120From: Anthony RamirezAug 6, 1994 10:23 PM
Thanks for the directions. Just the info I needed. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#42025From: Robert WilcoxJul 30, 1994 8:12 AM
We bought Portable REXX at work which has DOS and windows versions. It is published by KiloWatt. The Windows version is unusable. At the last REXX symposium, IBM discussed plans to release a version of REXX for Windows but its not put yet. As far as the ARexx port goes, I believe the notion of ports, the client/server model, system lists of hosts and function libraries is Amiga specific and not a general feature of REXX implementations. This fact may mean that much that you are planning to do could prove undoable (at least via REXX). If all that is sought is REXX as the macro language for the application, it should be doable but forget about 'meta' scripts sending commands to control multiple 'hosts'. Bob
#42121From: Anthony RamirezAug 6, 1994 10:23 PM
Thanks for the info. As for the project that will be ported, they are MACROS that need to be ported to REXX, I don't believe there are multiple `hosts' to worry about. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#42132From: Vic WagnerAug 7, 1994 8:28 PM
Robert, Rexx on OS/2 can handle multiple hosts. Not many programs are written as such tho <sigh>.
#42133From: Robert WilcoxAug 7, 1994 10:45 PM
There seems to be an extremely limited number of environments which can accessed via ADDRESS. Also the business of registering all external functions in each script is rather annoying under OS/2 REXX. As I understand it, OS/2 REXX scripts for applications supporting REXX must run on the applications task. Whether this is caused by the failure to support ARexx style hosts or as a side effect of the interpreter implementation, I don't have a clue. Bob