CompuServe Thread

#TBC or VT-2600 card?

5 messages in this thread
#119641From: James FranssenAug 22, 1994 11:47 AM
I am in the process of purchasing a PAR (which seems like the place to post this would be in DPS forum if there is one, I'll check, but I want an unbiased opinion from someone here if possible), and I am a bit confused as to what I will need to bring in video images directly from a camcorder. A letter from DPS to a reseller states that "When combined with an optional DPS VT-2600 card, the PAR can even be used to capture video in real time." Now, I have also been informed that I will need a time base corrector (which DPS also puts out for the PAR) if I want to bring video in. Does this mean I will need both the card *and* the TBC? Or will either one on its own suffice? Thanks for an help. James Franssen Imagination Station
#119669From: Arturo SinclairAug 22, 1994 1:35 PM
I don't know if mine is an unbiased opinion. I shopped around for a while and decided on a VTV-2000 video capture board that captures high-res real time video to disk and also outputs high-res real time to tape. You are aware that all these systems depend in having a Micropolis AV series fast scsi drive to be able to pump highres frames at that speed. The difference is that PAR wants the hardrive all for itself. You cannot use it for any other storage need. The VTV-2000 also needs this drive but it lets you use it for whatever else you might need. I capture video directly from my hi-8 (I do stop-motion) with good results. A TBC is high on my priority list. The hi-8 does not provide a sufficiently stable signal and thus I have to do quite a bit of post-processing via Photoshop and some custom made software. I could avoid this with DPS TBC (which I use at work and is great) If you want info on VTV-200 call 612-5606205 (Visual Circuits)
#119678From: James FranssenAug 22, 1994 2:16 PM
Thanks Arturo. Let me ask, would I be fine with only the DPS TBC at capturing video? You mentioned you could avoid post-processing with the DPS TBC, does this mean the DPS TBC would work better than the VTV-2000? Is it an either-or situation? Thanks. James Franssen Imagination Station
#119889From: Arturo SinclairAug 23, 1994 6:30 PM
The TBC will provide you with a perfectly stable and synced image that will need little post-processing if any unless your source video really sucks :> If you get a VTV-2000 you don't need a TBC to capture and edit your animations or video, but it helps the quality of the incoming signal, specially if you are using a consumer grade camcorder. I don't personally use a TBC at home and since I use a consumer camcorder I have to further clean the image if I want an excellent output.
#119701From: CSA/CAAug 22, 1994 3:49 PM
James, The DPS VT-2600 (TBC IV) *IS* the time base corrector and input card necessary for the PAR to capture incoming video. You would not need another TBC in this situation. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates