CompuServe Thread

#PAR freaking out

20 messages in this thread
#125187From: James FranssenSep 22, 1994 9:55 PM
I've been working on an animation that is over 1500 frames, laying off directly to the PAR, without any problem, until now. I put a good portion of the animation on the par (756 frames), played that section and saw something that needed to be corrected. I went back into 3DS and corrected the problem, and started rendering again. A day later I stopped the rendering and went into PAR to see how it looked. It looked fine, so I decided to go ahead and insert it over the first. I split the first where the correction needed to be placed, then joined the corrected portion to the first. When I played the animation I got some weird flickering for a couple of frames on about the 68th frame and on or about the 320th frame. The best way I can describe this flickering is it looks like a green waffle, and it flickers for about 3 out of 10 frames. When I step through the animation manually, the problem does not exist. Yes, I am using QEMM, and I got an "Exception #13" with an "at" code that changes every time I try the PAR and exit. I went through the trouble-shooting routine for QEMM to no avail, but I honestly don't think it is a problem with QEMM because I have a few other animations that are not having this problem, and this same animation had no problem until I split and joined. I have split and joined other animations without a problem. Please don't suggest I re-render the sections that are giving me problems because this is only a band-aid, and I really don't want to run into this problem again. Sorry this was so long but I wanted to cover as much as possible from the start. Thanks for any suggestions. James Franssen Imagination Station – 72650,3677 @ 22-Sep-1994, 19:53:43
#125278From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 23, 1994 11:11 AM
James, I fixed this problem once by backing up my PAR drive, reformatting it, and copying *just* the animation in question to it. Evidently, the animation, somehow, is either not contiguous on your PAR drive, or the drive is just not moving data fast enough to keep up with the BLF assigned to your animation. This will put the .ANI on the highest performing area of your drive. If this doesn't do it for you, just re-copy the frames to a newly formatted PAR disk with gradually lower BLF settings until it plays back properly. Hope this helps, -Alan
#125319From: James FranssenSep 23, 1994 2:20 PM
"James, I fixed this problem once by backing up my PAR drive, reformatting it, and copying *just* the animation in question to it." Thanks Alan. Unfortunately I have already made a few animations and placed them on the PAR drive, and I have no other drive with as much space to place these files on in order to reformat the PAR. Does this mean I am going to lose days time of rendering just so I can reformat my drive? Is there another method? I am not knocking the PAR, since the problem may have originated due to my own negligence, but this is a great inconvenience and may inhibit my ability to appear professional to a client if this happens again while under the gun. Thanks for your input. James Franssen Imagination Station – 72650,3677 @ 23-Sep-1994, 12:10:32
#125393From: Brick EkstenSep 24, 1994 7:20 AM
See the message I posted on PAR BLOCK LIMITS. The problem appears to be that you have too much data on your drive. The best answer for you currently is to back up the data and restore just that animation, or to back up the largest animation, delete it, and optimize the drive. This will force the animations to move to a better area of the disk.
#125424From: James FranssenSep 24, 1994 2:32 PM
Brick, thanks for the reply. "The best answer for you currently is to back up the data and restore just that animation, or to back up the largest animation, delete it, and optimize the drive". On this note, I purchased the Micropolis 2217A and with it came a floppy Disk Manager from Ontrack. On the cover it says "Manufactured for Micropolis." It has a couple of functions, one is Disk Manager, and the other is Rocket. I tried to load these on, but it gave me an error that it cannot find the Micropolis HD. I called Micropolis help but they weren't exactly sure what I was talking about (they didn't know of any disk that was shipped with the drives), and they suggested I buy the disk manager to clear up the problem (does this sound typical?). Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else has run into this situation, and what did you do? Thanks. James Franssen Imagination Station – 72650,3677 @ 24-Sep-1994, 12:23:17
#125785From: Tim Krego, [pro.image]Sep 27, 1994 7:22 AM
>>> On this note, I purchased the Micropolis 2217A and with it came a floppy Disk Manager from Ontrack. On the cover it says "Manufactured for Micropolis." It has a couple of functions, one is Disk Manager, and the other is Rocket. I tried to load these on, but it gave me an error that it cannot find the Micropolis HD.<<< The Rocket program probably looks for an IDE DOS drive, when the drive is hooked up to the PAR it isn't a DOS drive.
#125845From: James FranssenSep 27, 1994 1:13 PM
>> The Rocket program probably looks for an IDE DOS drive, when the drive is hooked up to the PAR it isn't a DOS drive. << Umm, okay.. so does this mean it is out of the question? What's my solution? Do I need to go into the computer and physically unhook the drive from the PAR board? Thanks for any help, I realize you are not a Ontrack representative, but they didn't offer much help. James Franssen Imagination Station 72650,3677 @ 27-Sep-1994, 11:05:54
#125408From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 24, 1994 10:56 AM
I guess what it really comes down to, James, is this: If you are looking to get maximum image quality from your PAR system at all times, then using the PAR drive for animation "storage" is pretty much out of the question. As the drive fills, you will definitely start to see a degradation of quality, due to the HD's decreasing efficiency reading from inner tracks. This is only an inconvenience if we assume the PAR drive is a viable place to store multiple animations for future use while still maintaining optimum throughput/image quality for subsequent animations, which it's just not. So, like many operations in the 3D animation business, it's probably a good idea to plan our projects around the limitations of the HW involved with the project. Here's some of the things I consider: 1) If image quality is an issue for the animation (and it probably usually will be) always start with a relatively fresh PAR drive. If I cannot get an animation compiled with a BL of at least 250 (depending on the characteristics of the animation itself), I'll delete stuff from the PAR drive until am assured that I am getting the best possible quality for the project. You be the judge of the level of image quality your project demands. 2) Always keep in mind that, in order for the PAR to work properly, all frames (in an animation) have to be contiguous, and be in an area of the disk that supports the BL used to compile that particular animation. If the data gets moved around (say, through copying, splitting, joining, restoring, etc.) to an area that doesn't support it, you can have problems. 3) NEVER erase .TGA frames from your system (at least back 'em up!) until the animation is safely on video tape, and the client has signed off on the project (read: you've gotten your check!<g>). Consider adding HD space (it's gettin' really cheap these days) to your PAR system to safely store .ANI files while you are keeping your current PAR work at highest quality levels. As far as appearing professional to your clients goes, you don't need me to tell you that a thorough understanding of your tools is essential to "delivering the goods", and this forum is a great way for all of us to extend our knowledge. That being said, I always try to minimize potential problems by only promising what I'm *absolutely sure* I can deliver, and try to *never* rely on specualtion or an assumption. In other words, no matter what I read or am told, until I see something actually work, know how it works, and pretty much make it work myself, I will not promise a client that something is a reality. This may seem a little restrictive, but I cannot tell you the amount of times this atitude has saved my butt. It usually only means a little extra time to get familiar with a new piece of equipment or operation before offering the service to a client. And this, I feel, is a good part of what the client is paying for when he hires an expert or consultant. I hope this is taken in the proper context! I do not wish to sound "preachy", but you brought up a good point, and I just wanted to let folks know what works for me…. Thanks. Best of luck, -Alan
#125425From: James FranssenSep 24, 1994 2:33 PM
Alan Hi. Thanks for your reply.. "Consider adding HD space (it's gettin' really cheap these days) to your PAR system to safely store .ANI files while you are keeping your current PAR work at highest quality levels". I have a Micropolis 2217A (I believe it is 1.8 GIG or something in this area), what would you suggest would be the best HD to add.. and external? Something like Burneoulli <- (pardon the spelling if it is wrong)? This is a new area for me. Thanks. James Franssen Imagination Station – 72650,3677 @ 24-Sep-1994, 12:28:49
#125435From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 24, 1994 4:21 PM
If a removable storage system makes sense for you, the Bernoulli or SyQuest units are nice. I just use a 1.8 gig Quantum on the PAR system for fast backup and frame storage. -Alan
#125451From: Don LandisSep 24, 1994 8:12 PM
Your advice, as usual is right on target. It deserves to be published in some publication as tips for the PAR owner. I'll bet Michele has already archived your comments for a future book. <BG> Have you tried to play anything from the Quantum? I'm about ready to get my second drive here too but It will be another Mic (2217A). I need all the working drive space possible. I'll continue to save important *.ani's to tape during off hours. If I need them for demo I'v got video tape for that. I always considered my PAR drive like RAM not storage. With this mindset I should be in good shape for the Abekas someday. <BG>
#125489From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 25, 1994 10:14 AM
Thanks for the kind words, Don. Coming from you, that's a real compliment! No, I haven't tried to PAR-ize the Quantum. It's SCSI, so I couldn't even experiment if I wanted to. Sounds like as interesting thing to try, though. I basically got it to hold frames and backups for/from the PAR drive. Keeping examples of your work around on video is exactly how I do it, too. Every time someone needs some SP output and I have a PVW or UVW over here, I take the opportunity to put whatever animations I might have laying around to BC-Metal tape for archival purposes. Also, having a running history of first-generation SVHS dubs of my work is a decent way of demoing it here at my "studio". And of course all this helps to keep my PAR drive relatively free for new projects, etc. If you keep it up with all this interesting (lucrative?) video work you are talking about, you'll have your Abekas before you know it!<g> -Alan
#125494From: Don LandisSep 25, 1994 11:14 AM
OK I misunderstood you on the Quantum drive. I thought you installed it as a low speed drive right on the PAR as a slave for archival purposes. I also thought it was an IDE, of course. If you did I had a ton of questions for you. Do you know anybody that is doing this yet? ie master/slave on the PAR. I might be the first user to try it. The video work is going great and the Fast VM is really getting a work- out. But before I go to an Abekas I want to be fully betacam SP edit and shooting capable. Then I want the new NLE DPR from Fast. My PAR is just fine for me right now. As far as quality goes the PAR is at the top of my equipment. Even the Fast frame buffers are only 640 resolution. Nope! the PAR is going to have a pretty long life here compared to other computer hardware I think.
#125550From: Sep 25, 1994 10:53 PM
Don: >> Do you know anybody that is doing this yet? ie master/slave on the PAR. We had two 2217s on the PAR from last Thanksgiving to May of this year, then took the second drive off for a needy DOS machine. No problems, worked fine. Of course, PAR.EXE wouldn't support two drives back then, so we had to write our own app to do that. If you need the capacity, go for it! Greg Pyros
#125629From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 26, 1994 11:13 AM
>>Low-speed PAR drive for archival purposes<< Hmmm…interesting concept. 2217's are getting so cheap these days that I guess ya might as well go full speed, no? I haven't compared the prices lately, so I'm not really sure at this point. No, I'm not familiar with any user (except Greg) that has used multiple PAR drives yet. It would be nice to hear how it worked with copying times, etc. Great to hear your equipment is working so well for you. With faster IDE drives on the horizon, I guess that it's a possibility that PAR image quality will be able to improve. I'll be keeping my ear to the ground with DPS… -Alan
#125466From: James FranssenSep 24, 1994 10:00 PM
"I just use a 1.8 gig Quantum on the PAR system for fast backup and frame storage." Is the Quantum external? Who do I contact on the pricing of the Quantum? Thanks. James Franssen Imagination Station 72650,3677 @ 24-Sep-1994, 19:50:58
#125490From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 25, 1994 10:14 AM
I hope you didn't mis-understand me, James. The Quantum is a SCSI drive installed in the same system as the PAR. I use it to render to, and as relatively (than to tape or over the network) fast backup for PAR files. It is available from all the big HD companies. If you have an IDE-based system already, you might consider taking GregP's advice and getting a (another?) Mic 2217A that can be used as a regular system drive, or a PAR drive depending on where you need it most at the time. -Alan
#125523From: David StinnettSep 25, 1994 4:51 PM
Is the Quantum just your every-day scsi drive, or is there something unique about it? I'm just curious, since it seems there was some sudden interest when the name was brought up. David
#125630From: ALAN IGLESIASSep 26, 1994 11:13 AM
Sorry about the confusion David. The Quantum is just a (quite fast) SCSI system drive that lives in the PAR box. I mentioned it because it's speed and proximity to the PAR system make it a good way to back up PAR files, which keeps the PAR drive relatively clean for higher-quality PAR output. -Alan
#125663From: David StinnettSep 26, 1994 3:03 PM
Thanks, that's what I thought. Drive prices are coming down nicley, I've noticed a couple 1.08 gig drives now available for less than $600. Now if only the price of RAM would do the same… David