#Win 95 and DOS Network
3 messages in this thread
Hey Don,
As things were left in a bit of scramble, some clarification is in order.
There is a way with MSDOS.SYS to set up Win 95 so that it either boots to Win
95 or DOS straight. I've spent some time with WFDOS and if you use the Basic
Redir the overhead is not bad and it works quite well in a dual boot
configuration. NT and WFDOS are a natural. Win 95 is great for what it is but
it doesn't facilitate being a DOS server with any great ease.
WFDOS is workable and appears to be able to handle the render traffic o.k. I
haven't gotten the CD situation worked out entirely but adjusting the Files and
Locks attributes in SHARE.EXE should do the trick. The setup on WFDOS is
manual and a bit tedious. There is a popup to help but you can't use a mouse.
I just built several batch files, one for SHARES and one for USES. Unlike
Lantastic it doesn't have a batch builder and overall is pretty primitive. But
it does appear to do the job and satisfactorily.
The easiest combination to setup is NT and WFDOS. But there are some advantages
to using Win 95 as you can run 3DS from within quite easily. It does seem less
responsive and the mouse isn't as responsive but its probably worth it. I
prefer using a two system approach with two SVGA monitors, one running 3DS and
one running Win 95 or NT. WFDOS works fine, not quite as well as Lan 6, but
that is offset by the responsiveness of Win 95 and NT 32 bit drivers to some
degree.
I don't presume this to be the last word on the best setup but it does seem to
be the best overall approach as its about as clean as it gets. The Win 95 CD
has alot of valuable information on networking etc. which is well worth
checking out. It explains how to setup MSDOS.SYS for instance to get a dual
boot etc.
Hope this has resolved the tangled mess created earlier and will put you on the
right course.
Alex
Thanks Alex.
It seems for me right now the right course is to let things the way they are.
I have decided to install win95 on it's own HD and electrically switch to it
when I want to run win95. The prices of 540 meg hard drives makes this the
logical approach until the reports that _everything_ can be run from win95
and/or winNT.
Don,
>> let things the way they are… <<
After going through the various configurations, that would seem to be the
easiest solution by far. Its been interesting and I've learned alot, but enough
for the present. Work doesn't wait.
Electrically switching is an unusual approach. I wonder how well that would
work the PAR. It does have possibilities.
Alex