CompuServe Thread

#DigiView 3.0

4 messages in this thread
#5647From: Dale SchlottOct 20, 1988 10:06 PM
I've found a problem. Digi-View 3.0 is not setting up the screen size properly. (in overscan only) I wrote a up a quick program today that patches the IFF files. I'll upload it tomorrow. Not sure if your problem with quickflix is the same as the one that bit me, but if quickflix is doing it's thing correctly then the problem probably is the same one. Dale
#5653From: Steven BennettOct 20, 1988 10:49 PM
Odd… In what way are they not setting the screen size properly? (More than idle curiosity… I've been working on some Amiga overscan stuff for a little while, and will be saving to IFF, so I'd like to avoid doing it wrong…)
#5661From: Dale SchlottOct 21, 1988 5:23 AM
At longword offset 9 in the IFF file, they are leaving the screen size set to the non-overscan values. (320/400, 320/200 etc) Some programs may not mind this, but SuperView seems too. I have no idea what that location is for. I don't have the IFF spec. I found it by comparing Digi-View overscan pic's with pic's created by some of the other programs. (Sculpt-3d, and Impulse products) The program I wrote reads the longword at offset 5 and duplicates it to offset 9. Seems to fix things right up. Of course without any info on the IFF file format, I don't know what I'm doing. Just that it works. Take a look at a IFF pic file with newzap, you'll see what I'm doing. Dale
#5670From: Steven BennettOct 21, 1988 6:18 PM
Hmmn. The longword at offset 5 (which, BTW, isn't GUARENTEED to be at that offset, but generally is…) is the actual size of the bitmap. The longword at offset 9 is something referred to as the "page" size. While I'm not sure if this size should be used to determine if the image uses overscan or not, I'd think it *should* be the same size or larger than the bitmap size itself. I'd have to read up on it more carefully to be sure what the case is… –>Steve Bennett