#Erasable optical Disk
1 messages in this thread
New 325 MB removable erasable optical disk drive
One of my clients will be introducing an erasable and removable optical
disk with 325 megabytes per side (total of 650 per disk) with 28
millisecond access speed sometime during the first quarter of next year
(1989). The drive will have a SCSI interface and work with IBM, Macintosh,
and Sun computers. I would value your feedback on some of the questions I
have on how you would like to see this removable erasable optical disk
introduced.
The erasable removable optical disk drive will have a half-high 5 1/4-inch
form factor, so you could slip it into your IBM AT underneath the floppy
drive. In a subsustem you could have two of these 325 megabyte drives in
the same subsystem, or one erasable optical disk and a second half-high
Winchester or 1/4-inch tape cartridge drive.
The cost of the drive is still up for discussion, but most likely will be
in the $3500 to $5,995 at the retail level. (Please give me your thoughts
on the price.) The cost of the removable optical disks themselves will be a
function of the volume but the best guess now is that they will fall
somewhere between $100 and $250 per 650 megabyte cartridge (325 MB per
side).
One of the things I would most like to know is how you would rate the value
of mass storage as a function of size and access speed. For example, how
would you rank in desirability the following full-high 5 1/4-inch mass
storage subsystem, assuming that they are all selling for the same price,
and that the optical disks are erasable (that is to say) they ain't WORM
drives and they ain't CD-ROMs? Assume that the subsystems are all the same
price and that the disks have the same access speed.
___ 380 MB Full high Fixed Winchester hard disk
___ 650 MB Full high Fixed Winchester hard disk
___ Single160 MB Half high Fixed Winchester hard disk
___ 160 MB Half high Fixed Winchester hard disk with 1/4-inch tape drive
___ 160 MB Half high Fixed Winchester hard disk with 325 MB Half-high
removable optical disk drives
___ Single 325 MB Half-high removable optical disk drives
___ Dual 325 MB Half-high removable optical disk drives
___ 325 MB Half-high removable optical disk drive with 1/4-inch tape drive
___ 650 MB Full high dual-sided, full high removable optical disk drive
___ 650 MB Full high dual-sided, full high non-removable optical disk drive
If you're not too out of breath answering these for me, and you have just a
little more time, tell me how you would rank them if everything stayed the
same except the Winchester hard disks increased in average access speed
from 28 to 16 milliseconds.
And for your last question, how would you rank them if the Fixed
Winchesters were removable~but remember, the entire drive would come out of
the subsystem. You would not be able to slip 650 MB into your sports coat
pocket like you could with an optical disk.
I would appreciate any comments. I'd also appreciate it if you could tell
me what computer you now use and how you use it.