CompuServe Thread

#Advertising the 2500?

29 messages in this thread
#68168From: Ethan SolomitaOct 3, 1989 11:19 PM
I was told at the recent Amiga Users Group (Amuse) meeting that the upcoming advertisements will be aimed almost exclusively at the A500. Is that true? — Ethan
#68172From: Steve AhlstromOct 3, 1989 11:36 PM
Ethan, Yes, that is true. The TV advertising will be rather generic yet the final shot will be that of an A500. Lloyd Mahaffey, VP of Marketing at CBM, will be our guest in the next few weeks in a formal conference. The date an time will be announced shortly.
#68265From: Ethan SolomitaOct 4, 1989 7:41 PM
I understand the concept of advertising the 500 over the 2000: get the name out and sell TONS of machines as quickly as possible, I just don't agree with it. Commodore and the Amiga have a horrible image problem. This may bring the Amiga into the household but it may put the last nail in the coffin for the higher-end Amigas. Business-Land already thinks the Amiga is a toy and seeing advertising showing the 500 will convince them they're right! Arrgh! — Ethan
#68335From: Christopher R. HertelOct 5, 1989 2:39 PM
I second that! Folks around here (at my office) are all hyped about their new pet buzzword – "Workstations". They want to buy VAX 3100's! As X-Windows Terminals! Geez! An Amiga with a flicker fixer is a much better deal, but folks don't think of them as workstations! There were rumors about HP and CBM making a deal… I hope some of it comes true. I would like to see the Amiga move into a bigger and bigger system, filling in from the high end of the home market to the low end of the mini market. I imagine an Amiga 6000 – a free standing unit supporting several Amiga 1500s, 2000s, 2500s, 3000s on a high speed network that would compete with a Cray in overall graphics performance. Ah well, I dream. Chris -)—-
#68392From: RON TROYOct 5, 1989 8:02 PM
I just wish I could get the long announced xwindows and decnet for Amiga's. Ron
#68468From: Christopher R. HertelOct 6, 1989 9:51 AM
Well, as I understand it, you can buy Xwindows for the Amiga, but it doesn't do DECwindows yet. (Only TCP/IP for now.) However, Syndesis is looking at the end of this year for TSSnet (DECnet) and Dale Luck says that he should have a DECnet version of Xwindows ready (using TSSnet) before 1990. Those are not promises. Chris -)——
#68524From: Steve PietrowiczOct 6, 1989 6:46 PM
You *can* by XWindows for the Amiga. I know, because I've done it! Steve
#68692From: Ariel ButlerOct 7, 1989 1:27 PM
So, Steve… Seeing as how you already have and use this stuff, could you give me your overall impression of it? The installation where I work is lousy with Ameristar ethernet boards, and I'd kind of like to know what this package could do for me. Alternatively, you could just point me at a review of the X-windows stuff in any recent Amiga rag, but why deny yourself the pleasure of expousing personal opinion? ;^) Thanks, Ariel
#68724From: Steve PietrowiczOct 7, 1989 7:41 PM
Hehe….Well, I don't know of an review of X-Windows software in any magazine, so you'll *have* to listen to my opinion. 😉 If you're familiar with X at all, it's very straight forward to use. Generally, when I use it, I start up the Xinit program (to start X running on the Amiga), log into a system with the X clients via telnet or rlogin, and run the clients to my X Server. It would be really nice to have a bigger monitor than just the 1084S (and a flicker fixer), but it works out pretty well. Dale includes a bunch of X clients that can run native on the Amiga, so you can run clients locally as well. (Note that if you want to run terminal sessions to another machine, those machines must have the X clients available on it, notably XTERM). If you're not familiar with X, a good book to look at is the X Window system user guide by O'Reilly and Associates. It's a big thick book with a pink cover, and is one of a three volume set. Personally, I think having X on my Amiga is the greatest thing since sliced bread! I just need a bigger monitor now, so I can fit more windows on the screen. 🙂 Steve
#68828From: Ariel ButlerOct 8, 1989 12:38 PM
Thanks, Steve. We may invest some money to experiment with it, what is the package running nowdays? Ariel
#68858From: Steve PietrowiczOct 8, 1989 6:05 PM
Let's see here….the X software itself is $395. X software with 3 button optical Boing Mouse is $475. X, mouse, and ethernet board is $1399. Call Boing for details: 408-262-1469. Tell him I sent ya. 🙂 Steve
#68970From: Christopher R. HertelOct 9, 1989 12:57 PM
Right, that's what I thought I said. But you CAN'T buy a DECnet version yet. The DECnet version is still being worked on. Chris
#68589From: RON TROYOct 6, 1989 9:51 PM
I understand all this, but the original dates (sound familiar) were somewhat earlier. I would like to encourage CBM to get involved here because the business potential of xwindows and/or decwindows plus tssnet/decnet is phenomenal. So far their interest is pretty much non-existent. Ron
#68971From: Christopher R. HertelOct 9, 1989 1:01 PM
I couldn't agree more! I've heard of people designing X terminals that would do no more than run the Xserver software, but would cost the same as an Amiga system. If there is money to be made making that kind of terminal, then there is money to be made with a computer that does everything else as well. Chris -)—–
#68978From: RON TROYOct 9, 1989 1:54 PM
Imagine a workstation that is x and dec windows compatible, has all the presentation ability of the Ami, full multitasking, a pc built in, multiple windows to handle things like market feeds, etc, and you have something that someone on a trading floor would probably kill for! Ron
#68994From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffOct 9, 1989 4:54 PM
Lets buy some amigas, paint them, and triple the prices. Thgem we could sell them as Xstations… talk about value added
#69023From: Ray LewisOct 9, 1989 6:53 PM
Talk to Thomas Holiday about that. He has exactly that kind of a concept in mind for the bond trading firm he works for. Anything and everything that might advance Amy toward that should interest him, I would think. Ray Lewis
#69074From: RON TROYOct 9, 1989 11:17 PM
Do you have his UIC? Ron
#69139From: Dan LeeOct 10, 1989 2:15 PM
Where did you get the original dates ? Gfxbase's X11 has been available commercially since April [and before if you call Luck directly]. I've seen messages from Synthesis talking about work on Decnet, but none promised any 'release date'. Cann't missed any promise that way 🙂 One fact is that Commodore does not have high enough profit margins to afford sales engineer calling on you weekly. I think the choice is between shopping at high-priced Beverly Hills store with personal service vs self-help warehouse. At one end of the spectrum lies IBM vs CBM being way over the other side. Aside from taking over the management and repositioning the company there is no conclusive way to demonstrate the best approach for CBM. Still, if you dangle prospect for a big sale in front of CBM's regional people, you will get some attention. They probably just have insufficient staff to chase down every alley. I know a local dealer was able to get regional help when Boeing was looking to buy hundreds of machines.
#69198From: RON TROYOct 10, 1989 9:14 PM
I found out about their x11 from an article in a DEC oriented weekly, which suggested rather strongly that they had a rather ready to go set of products. That was many months ago. As to CBM, they have a chance if they move on it to break into a very difficult but potentially very profitable market, that of traders workstations. The Amiga is perfect for that role if the missing links are provided – xwindows/decwindows with Decnet over both serial and ethernet. I talked to 2 CBM reps. One was not my local one, the other is, and the local one never got back to me (the other one is now gone). He had promised to. I tried calling someone at CBM directly and they either don't return calls or refer you to the rep. In the 4 years I've been involved in Amiga's, I've never had a rep in this area who paid any attention to current and possible customers. Even here when they stand to make some really good profits by just putting things together and giving a little help they make it painfully clear that they just don't care. Ron
#68434From: Ethan SolomitaOct 5, 1989 11:55 PM
If there is ANY validity to a takeover rumor the first evidence comes from the stock quadrupling. Commodore's stock has been plummeting! — Ethan
#68843From: KevinCOct 8, 1989 2:45 PM
Whoa there Chirs… Please don't get me wrong, I LOVE my amy, but compete with a VAXstation ??? Hmmm… if I can believe our hardware guru at work, a 3100 is about 1/2 of an 8650 or 3X an 11/780. I don't think that an Amiga can really approach that even with the GVP '030 card. Plus X-Windows is a H-O-G memory-wise. Our stations have something like 8-Meg in them and with one batch job running and two terminal windows open, things start getting swapped out. Plus, let's see… a 2000 + GVP card + flicker fixer + multi-synch monitor + extra memory + ethernet card = approx. $9000 which is getting quite near the VAXstation range. Well so much for my two cents… fire away… Kevin
#68859From: Steve PietrowiczOct 8, 1989 6:05 PM
X-Windows might be a hog on your system, but I run it from the Amiga quite comfortably on a 3 Meg machine. Steve
#68973From: Christopher R. HertelOct 9, 1989 1:13 PM
That's because the VAX is running VMS or ULTRIX. I don't know much about Ultrix (DEC's UNIX), but if the architecture is anything like VMS then 1) you will be using a couple of Meg for the operating system, all of its tables, resident libraries, etc. 2) each process will be given a certain amount of memory for I/O, etc. even if it doesn't need it. 3) there will be a couple of programs that are just always there… and a few other things going on as well. We put in a single-user LANserver 2000, which is a MicroVAX 2000. The original configuration had 4MB of RAM, but we found that we had to expand it to 10MB or we started to run out disk space because of the page and swap files. There is a heck of a lot going on in VMS. It is designed as a multi-user system that also handles a lot of jobs in the background, like networking, page swapping, process monitoring, etc. Chris -)—–
#68972From: Christopher R. HertelOct 9, 1989 1:04 PM
Well, if they were going to use the VAXstations as anything more than Xterminals then I would see the point. But to purchase five or six VAXstations just as X terminals? I would rather see the money go to upgrade our 6310s to 6410s or 6320s. Chris -)——
#68360From: Ray LewisOct 5, 1989 6:43 PM
Ethan: The way the Mac got into business was having lots of folks have them at home first. Management wasn't sold on the Mac until enough of their people said "there's this other machine that can do stuff the IBM's can't. Let's at least get one or two in here." I have no problem with CBM pushing lots of 500s out the door. Once they are out there, a certain percentage of people will start trading up, and the fellowship of Amiga "power users" (what an awful expression) will vastly expand. THEN we will have a shot at the big leagues. Ray Lewis
#68500From: Ethan SolomitaOct 6, 1989 3:10 PM
But there is a difference between here between the Amiga now and the original Macs: Macs were always in the thousands of dollars. You couldn't call them game machines because no one could afford them for that purpose. Meanwhile, the Amiga 500 with monitor is only around $750. — Ethan
#68581From: Ray LewisOct 6, 1989 9:48 PM
So what? Somebody gets one for the gee whiz games (tho I expect that the commercials will emphasize animation, video, multitasking and sound). Then a certain percentage pick up an Amiga mag or three, maybe just for the game reviews. Then a certain percentage of them read some of the other articles and say to themselves, "Holy batdoo, I didn't know this machine could do THAT — I want to learn more!" And from there, we conquer the world! (Today Ashtabula — tomorrow Poughkeepsie!) Ray Lewis
#68711From: Ethan SolomitaOct 7, 1989 7:02 PM
The problem is that both Commodore and the Amiga have strong images as a game machine company and that company's game machine. This is something which will hold the Amiga back in the business world. Apple (with the Mac) never had that problem, as their computer was priced so high that no one could consider it a game machine. Also it was an excellent innovation at the time. What it lacked was software, which the Amiga lacks today. Soooo, my point (which I think is based on a message about 5 back) is that if Commodore advertises the Amiga 500 with a kid playing a major role in the ad (as is expected), this may permanently solidify the game image. — Ethan