#Selling the Amiga
2 messages in this thread
Steven:
I'd agree that there are many poor quality (aka "cheaply made") Amiga
programs. However, I also think that there is a growing number of high
quality Amiga programs.
I'd also agree that the focus of the Amiga software market needs to
change. I think that feature-packed Amiga software that rivals similar
packages on the Mac and PeeCee is long overdue. I also think that Amiga
users should be willing to pay the price for this software. What we have
here is a catch-22. Amiga users aren't willing to fork out the $$$ for
software because of the credibility problem you mentioned, and Amiga
developers can't afford to deliver first class software because users
aren't willing to pay for it. I think both sides of the issue should
re-evaluate their position.
Quality software is _very important_ to the future of the Amiga. It
doesn't matter how good the hardware gets if the software we're running
isn't up to par with packages on other platforms. To be fair, the Mac and
PeeCee have their fair share of "cheaply made" software too. They just
have a lot more of it to choose from! 🙂
Wayne Steele
Saving $ with AutoPilot
Wayne,
Glad to hear there are other supporters. It occured to me as I was
thinking about this whole issue that if the Japanese felt the same way some
Amiga developers think, the Japanese would never have had the success they
had in the US auto market. Today, they virtually dominate in every price
range of car by delivering outstanding quality at a price people are
willing to pay. And I do strongly believe that people will pay more for
quality.