CompuServe Thread

#SCSI Time-out

5 messages in this thread
#165234From: Pete DenomySep 24, 1994 6:58 PM
I'm looking for information about the setting of the SCSI time-out on an A3000 with OS3.1 installed and functioning. I needed to set,using BattMem, the long SCSI time-out to 2 secs in-order for OS3.1 to boot my computer. However, the time-out seems to be more like 20 secs before the boot begins after a cold startup. I have the following hard drive on my system: 1.) The boot drive is a Quantum 40mb ProDrive model #313440-01. 2.) The other is a Maxtor 7245SR. Under OS2.1 and earlier I had no problem with the default setting of the short SCSI time-out of 128ms; and I think that the system only needs a slight increase in the time-out to satisfy OS3.1 on cold startup. Evidently OS3.1 is more sensitive about the stability of the drives before it will initiate the boot operation. Also, I would like some info concerning "asyncronous" compared to "syncronous" SCSI operation. This switch is avail with BattMem and I remember some-one talking about the requirement to set "syncronous" operation for OS3.1. However, I have no problems with the default setting with this switch OFF. Thanks in advance for any info . / / Flying The A3000 on AutoPilot 1.74 \/\/ from Durham,Ontario.
#165294From: Dick SchnaseSep 25, 1994 6:49 AM
Pete, PD>However, the time-out seems to be more like 20 secs before the boot PD>begins after a cold startup. Yes, I have (or had) the same situation (A3K w/ 80MB Quantum and ADOS 3.1). For bootup, the long delay is ok, but I got tired of the wait when using the three finger salute and changed back (via BattMem) to the 128 Ms timeout. This means rebooting upon powerup, but I don't powerup very often so that seemed the way to go. As far as I know, there is no in between, i.e., there is only 128 Ms or 2 seconds. Maybe some enterprising young Ami programer will write another BattMem utility with inbetween choices. PD>some info concerning "asyncronous" compared to "syncronous" SCSI operation. I tried asyncronous for awhile – all worked OK. Then one day, I threw caution to the wind (after a lengthy floppy backup) and changed the setting to syncronous. File transfers are snappier and everything seems to work OK… Hope this helps. Dickoux
#165343From: Pete DenomySep 25, 1994 5:46 PM
Thanks Dick,Ed for the info but I think that until or if someone comes out with a util with in between SCSI settings that I will leave my time-out set to 2 secs. Async vs. Sync ? I'll leave that alone to for now. / / Flying The A3000 on AutoPilot 1.74 \/\/ from Durham,Ontario.
#165331From: Ed VishootSep 25, 1994 3:26 PM
Pete, I noticed that when I installed WB3.1 on my A3000, that the SCSI buss device checking goes light-years faster. I used to get about 15 pulses to my SyQuest drive (drive light flashes) but now only see one pulse before Mr. SCSI passes it up looking for somebody else to pick on! I have done what you are considering and have changed the time-out to 2 sec with no problems. The syncronous/asyncronous thing is there so you can get real ticked off at Mr. SCSI when you play around with it <grin>. This flag is something you would change if ALL your SCSI devices would support it and then you would theoretically get more throughput on your buss. Of all the hard drives I've played with, only the more expense, fast, large capacity drives have supported this feature. I also remember some SuperInfoHwy gossip about WB3.1 not liking this flag enabled but I don't know that as fact since I didn't test it. I would recommend you leave this flag alone if it is working the way it is set. EdV
#165398From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaSep 26, 1994 12:00 AM
Pete, the Initiate Synchronous Transfers flag's effects may vary from drive to drive, but my fast SCSI-2 drive definitely wants it on. I think other people have experienced various degrees improvement or not. In my case, it's all or nothing. DJ On AP from Queens, the thrill and excitement of the Big Apple Where a little paranoia is always a healthy attitude …