CompuServe Thread

#Network/OS choice

26 messages in this thread
#193201From: Alan J. PolinskySep 29, 1995 5:00 PM
I am setting up a small network (6 nodes) that will be dedicated to 3DS rendering and I am trying to determine what will be the best choice for network software/configuration on a price/performance basis. My alternatives are: 1. A dedicated server running Netware with each workstation running 3DS under DOS clients. 2. A dedicated server running Windows NT Server with each workstation running 3DS under DOS clients. 3. All machines running WIN95 with only one machine having shared drives and acting as a dedicates server, then running 3DS in a DOS session under WIN95. 4. What about running WIN NT WS on all of the workstations (Does NT have built in peer-to-peer services or is NT Server nec.?) Option 3 would be the most economical interms of network software (my new computers will come with WIN95 installed), but is there a performance hit when running 3DS in a DOS session under WIN95? And will I still have access to the shared drives when I'm in DOS? (I have not tried it yet.) One machine will probably also have a DPS PVR board…what are the OS considerations/complications when using that guy (WIN3 v. WIN95 v. NT v. DOS)? I know some/all of this stuff has been discussed before, but any advice (or summary of past discussion) would be appreciated.
#193335From: Sep 30, 1995 6:54 PM
Alan: Concerning your new network questions, I would strongly recommend starting out with an NT server, and you can place the PVR on that. If you will stay below 10 stations, NT Workstation will be fine, if over 10, you will need NT Server. This will not only work well for you now, but when MAX comes out next year, you won't have to change anything on the server, and you're ready to go! Greg Pyros
#193403From: Stephen C. LevyOct 1, 1995 1:56 PM
Greg, PMJI, but lemme see if I got this right… You're saying that with fewer than 10 nodes, you can set up a server running NT Workstation; it's just if you get bigger that you need to go to Advanced Server (?) Thanx, SCL
#193618From: Oct 2, 1995 7:44 PM
Steve: >> You're saying that with fewer than 10 nodes, you can set up a >> server running NT Workstation; it's just if you get bigger that >> you need to go to Advanced Server? Yup, NT Workstation will allow a maximum of 10 connections. (They've got to do something to sell their server edition!) Greg Pyros
#193683From: Stephen C. LevyOct 3, 1995 1:49 AM
Greg, Thanx; I'm surprised to learn that you can get even THAT big with Workstation alone. (Guess they're not QUITE as greedy as I thought! <BG>) SCL
#193717From: Alan J. PolinskyOct 3, 1995 8:33 AM
In a small (less than 10 nodes with no security req.) network environment, what's the benefit of using NT Workstation as the "server" vs. a WIN95 "server"? Also…I know that a there has been some discussion about running 3DS under WIN95…but is there a performance hit? What about running 3DS in a DOS session under NT while we wait for MAX?
#193718From: Alan J. PolinskyOct 3, 1995 8:42 AM
Oops…I just read some more messages further down the forum…and it seems that running 3DS under NT is NG and that there is a performance hit when running under 95. Is there a way to get DOS clients to connect to an NT workstation acting as a "server", or will NT Server be the answer?
#193755From: Bob KohlOct 3, 1995 11:18 AM
Alan, We are just putting a system together and what we are going to try is running 3ds4 on dos machines with "MS-Dos add on for workgroups" by Microsoft to hook-up to a WFW server. Claus Diekmann is running like that and my dealer says that the the MS dos extensions work with NT as well. So all the 3ds stations run in dos and network through 1 machine in WFW or NT as a server. I hope it's as simple as that. Should be trying it out by the weekend. Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#193821From: Oct 3, 1995 4:43 PM
Bob: >> Should be trying it out by the weekend. Let us know how it works out for you! Greg Pyros
#193837From: Bob KohlOct 3, 1995 6:44 PM
I'm hoping all I'll have to say is "GGRREEAATT". Then you'll know!! Other wise I'll be @#$&***?!@#!!!!.<G> Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl !^NavFont01F0004HG6DE301
#195870From: Bob KohlOct 18, 1995 12:09 AM
<< Should be trying it out by the weekend. Let us know how it works out for you! Greg Pyros>> This has been a long and thrilling weekend. I installed the WFW network on my 486-100 and the Dos extensions on both P-100 and it worked. The dos extensions are simple but you just have to try different assignment sequence and re-boots before you find the right way to log-on automatically. Slave rendering went without a hitch on one P-100 and the other kept hanging up at various places. So we changed one thing at a time and tried a new slave render. Well it took 1 mobo, 1 netcard, swapped 1 Ram chip, found something there, then a new HDD, swapped the chip, and change the mobo again! Well glad we were setup at the dealers lots of spare parts handy. If I can recommend something it would be just that. Setup your system at your dealers and try, try and try again until all the hardware bug are worked out. WFWgroups works very well as a host and running 3dstudio inside is good, except for jumping back into 3dStudio from windows, the screen doesn't redraw completely. I'm sure there's a trick, just haven't found it yet. Then I tried the PVR. Good news is: It works great! 1 hitch, it does not want to take more than 156 TGA frames at a time. Is that normal? Bad news: well the manual! I guess if I knew what I was talking about I wouldn't need more, but I couldn't tell you what a field is or an Alpha channel if it bit me! Any good books on Video ? I've read some threads that suggest to do this and that in video post production instead of in 3dstudio, but again I'm illiterate on the matter and I need to get knowledgeable fast! The real unfortunate part is that once I got everything running I started changing the name of the server and each machine as to identify them better and my two associates walked in. Well they were not pleased, because I'm not supposed to be doing that! The network is the HEART of the system and is supposed to be installed by some guy with a BIG "EXPERT" hat on. So they called the local Autodesk rep and got his opinion. We are meeting with him tomorrow. He claims that he does not have Autodesk's backing to put any guaranty on anything but a Novell network. Is that true ? My associates also claim that I cannot guaranty my setup and that "us users" are not to know anything about the network. "An expert gets paid to come and install this for us and configure etc…"."That's how it's done in acounting and lawyer firms" How come you know what you're talking about? ( I know the answer to that one: Because you NEED to know, simple isn't it? ). The situation is: there's only 3 of us! So ? I've been asked to get the best most flexible ( and powerfull ) setup for the lowest price. In one of your answers you told me <<NT, SchmenTee, it doesn't matter what is running on your file server! :^)>> so the solution I found was WFWgroups. I'm sorry if this is a little long, but the whole situation is a bit much for me. I unfortunately do not trust the only Adesk dealer in our region for 3 reasons: 1) He failed to realize that we could not afford the budget he quoted. With his quote on 2x P-75 HP and 1x P-90, 1 Sony monitor and novell 5 users, we managed to get 2-P100, 2x 17" screens, a PVR w/2.1Gb Barracuda, network, a flatbed scanner a Fargo, and we've got money left for another P100 if we need it! 2) He had no idea what a PVR was and tried to sell us his output to tape via framebuffer services at outrageous costs. 3) When I called 2 weeks ago, the sales people there had no clue that MAX existed in fact I send them the promotional letter that Autodesk Canada sent to their dealers to anounce the package deal with the upgrade migration fee. Well Thank God for Compuserve and specially everyone in this forum, because we would be bankrupt in our 3rd month of operation. This forum is the best course I've ever taken ( a little unstructured mind you <g> !). The dealer's ignorance is not Autodesk's fault at all. I know you are tied in somehow with Autodesk and to me your opinion has as much weight as Jonas etc… I just want to know if I'm doing O.K. or if I've gone completely "GAGA" and I should check my screen for harmful emissions? Thanks, Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#195876From: Oct 18, 1995 12:55 AM
Bob: Wow, what a message! I'll try to answer most of your questions: >> Then I tried the PVR. >> 1 hitch, it does not want to take more than 156 TGA frames at a time. >> Is that normal? I doubt it! Anyone have one of these beasts working properly yet? >> I guess if I knew what I was talking about I wouldn't need more, but >> I couldn't tell you what a field is or an Alpha channel if it bit me! Just hang around here, much better than a manual, and lots more fun! >> So they called the local Autodesk rep and got his opinion. We are >> meeting with him tomorrow. He claims that he does not have Autodesk's >> backing to put any guaranty on anything but a Novell network. >> Is that true ? Totally false. 3D Studio has been extensively tested on many different networks, and works fine on them. Some smaller/peer-to-peer networks have some problems when running many stations, but as long as you know your limitations (Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry, I believe) you'll be OK. >> In one of your answers you told me <<NT, SchmenTee, it doesn't matter >> what is running on your file server! :^) Be careful of what and who you quote out of context! :^) My comment came directly out of your question on what you could do, not necessarily what I would recommend! As I recall, I was talking about UNIX at the time! >> I know you are tied in somehow with Autodesk and to me your opinion >> has as much weight as Jonas etc… That sure puts me in with good company! <bg> My only affiliation with Autodesk is that I am a very happy user of their software, and have built an animation business around it. Well, and we write programs and drivers under contract for them. Oh, yes, I do write some books and magazine articles about their software. Yea, our top programmer is on loan to the Yost Group for the duration of the MAX programming. Um, I guess we are also Authorized Autodesk Developers. I'm also an official support person (FA) here on the forum. Come to think of it, I think I am pretty well tied into Autodesk! :^) Greg Pyros
#196011From: Bob KohlOct 18, 1995 7:54 PM
Greg Thanks for the answers and confirmations. To follow up, we met the dealer, and everybody talked bla bla bla. Finally I told him that I had everything working with WFWGroups and he became all suprised! Then we talked PVR ( What's that some sort of creative lab's game toy?) gave him the specs the tests I did on the weekend etc… So he took note of the system and he called Adesk. They answered they did not hear of any "bad stories using WFWgroups" or any known bugs. So he offered to install it "officially for us" with a guaranty plan etc… The Irony of it is, All I know comes from you guys and now I'm feeding an Adesk rep. in on what's up! Never thaught I could return the favor this way. Thanks again. Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#196050From: Oct 19, 1995 12:58 AM
Bob: >> The Irony of it is, All I know comes from you guys and now I'm >> feeding an Adesk rep. in on what's up! Just proves what most of us have said all along – this is THE best place to learn and get 3DS support! But please don't confuse the "Adesk dealers" with official "Adesk reps" – I have found that the Adesk reps are extremely knowledgeable and helpful, the only dealers I personally know that know a lot about 3DS hang out here! Greg Pyros
#196028From: Larry MintonOct 18, 1995 9:37 PM
Autodesk, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pyros Pictures. News at 11. LAM
#196051From: Oct 19, 1995 12:58 AM
Larry: >> News at 11. Hey, it's almost 11 here, what channel? :^) Greg Pyros
#195892From: MARTIN G FOSTEROct 18, 1995 2:28 AM
Bob, >> 1 hitch, it does not want to take more than 156 TGA frames at a time. Is that normal? << that's a known problem with Win 3.1 when you highlight a bunch of frames – apparently the selected files have that 156 limit. the workaround when you have more than 156 frames to send to the PVR is to only highlight the frame you want the sequence to start on and the PVR will happily keep importing frames until the sequence is ended (or broken). For example, if you have files fram0000.tga to fram0999.tga just highlight fram0000.tga and the PVR will stop after fram0999.tga. If you want it to stop sooner you'll have to wait around and hit <esc>. I believe this limitation will be gone in NT, but I'm not running it with NT yet so I can't be sure.
#196012From: Bob KohlOct 18, 1995 7:54 PM
Thanks Martin I'll give it a try. By the way I can confirm that the new Vibrant drivers 1.08c someting work for the Diamond Stealth 64 Vram 4Mb. 1024 x 768 16 million color !!! Just tried them today. So now I just have to find a way to increase the refresh rate on the screen from 44 to 75 and the it will stop flickering. Any clues ? Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#196146From: MARTIN G FOSTEROct 19, 1995 2:53 PM
Bob, >> So now I just have to find a way to increase the refresh rate on the screen from 44 to 75 and the it will stop flickering. Any clues ? << you need to install and run s64mode.exe – this will allow you to specify refresh rates for all your resolutions. It will then add this to your autoexec.bat.
#195896From: Stephen C. LevyOct 18, 1995 4:18 AM
Bob, PMJI, but that un-trustworthy dealer of yours sounds a lot like one I ran into here in SoCal… I started to get suspicious when he was telling me how 3DS will only run properly on one of three (expensive) machines, and of course, he was also an authorized reseller of two of 'em! Needless to say, I took my business elsewhere and I've been happy ever since! Good luck with your new Expert hat! SCL
#193999From: Chris NormanOct 4, 1995 12:55 PM
That should work. BTW, don't use ethernet, use 10-BT. It costs a little more, but you'll be glad you did. The extra bandwidth will speed up the network , and ethernet network cards sometime choke on big packets. Also, I highly recommend an NT server. It'll handle the files and servering _much_ better than a WFW server, and it won't GPF on you. Be sure and put a high speed network card in the server. It's been my experience when net-rendering on a Micro$oft network with more that 4 or 5 slaves, you'll see a decrease in server performance. Long save times can really ad up. NTAS will allow you all kinds of options to speed up your lan. Best-o-Luck! Chris
#194112From: Bob KohlOct 5, 1995 12:34 AM
Chris Thanks for your input, and I'll take the opportunity to tap some more knowledge, if you don't mind. The cards I want to start with were generic 10Mb/s (like GVC or something like that). My dealer was suggesting to go with some 3com dual ports with 100Mb/s and 10Mb/s. I couldn't answer because I have no idea of what the data flow is on a network while rendering. The other option was 3Com 10Mb/s cards. Of course everything has got it's price but I don't know what need really. Any insights are welcome. <<BTW, don't use ethernet, use 10-BT>> Is that a brand name? <<I highly recommend an NT server. It'll handle the files and servering _much_ better than a WFW server>> I will have 3 pentium 100 on the network and a 486-80 as a server, at least until MAX comes out. Then I'll switch to NT. Do you think WFW will hold 'till then? Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#194159From: Chris NormanOct 5, 1995 10:30 AM
As I see it, the best rull of thumb for network bandwidth in a graphical development LAN is "the higher the better". Your consultant was right in trying to point you at the 100Mb/s cards. They exceed what you will need in the short term, but provide a longterm solution. You can buy them now or upgrade later. 3Com is a nice brand, but pricey. Ask him what his return rate is on the generic network cards. The Generics usually work fine, but if there is one thing that holds true in this industry, you get what you pay for. 10-BT is a type of network cableing. Ethernet looks like cable TV cable, while 10-bT looks like phone wire. More commonly know as "Twisted-Pair". Also, If you use 10bt, you'll need a "concentrator" or hub. This device handles network collisions and packet routing. If your WFW server is dedicated, yes. It will work even if it's not, but I would use a P100 instead. Also, give him a PCI based network server card. Remember all that stuff about the "Render Jungle" and "Render Farm" and "Render Garden"? When I built the prototype, I used WFW for the server. It worked for 4 to 8 slaves, but when you crank up the network traffic, keep an eye on it. You might want to use '95 as a server. It's got better network support.
#194180From: Alan J. PolinskyOct 5, 1995 1:35 PM
Thanks….but what is "MS-Dos add on for workgroups"? I have never heard of of it! I assume that its DOS client software for a WFW network…is it available in the retail channels or do you get it from a dealer? If I use WIN95 for the server is there an "MS-DOS add-on for WIN95"? Good luck with your set up…
#194238From: Bob KohlOct 5, 1995 9:30 PM
Alan, << "MS-Dos add on for workgroups"?… I assume that its DOS client software for a WFW network.>> Right. <<.is it available in the retail channels>> Right again. Any little store that can get windows can get the DOS add-ons. << "MS-DOS add-on for WIN95"? >> Not sure, all I know is that we get the same MS-DOS add-on if we have an NT server or a WFWG server, so maybe it also works for '95. Keep asking and someone will answer for sure. Bob Kohl Cedille inc. -Bob Kohl
#194627From: Alan J. PolinskyOct 9, 1995 7:26 PM
Thanks. I'll check it out.