CompuServe Thread

#Phantom SMPTE

5 messages in this thread
#19682From: Bill ThompsonOct 28, 1990 11:33 AM
I just have to jump in here… the Syncman plus does convert MTC to SPP and does very good job aat that. I haven't put a lot of miles on the combo yet, but my experimenting with B&P has been successful. Mostly I prefer to use MTC, but I bought the Syncman plus so I could use it with Dr.T's. Dr.T seems to think that because they are the laargest MIDI/AMIGA player they can write the rules. Phantom is a perfect example of this mentality, as is ther MPE. I am not saying that MPE and Phantom aren't good products, it just annoys me a bit that the AMIGA MIDI vendors will not work together to give us what we deserve, a MIDI platform that simply makes all others obsolete. The AMIGA is still the only personal computer that multi-tasks, aand for those who think the others do, true multi-tasking requires inter-process communications, so the statement stands! With multi-tasking, and IPC, it is possible to run to sequencers, feed the ouptutof B&P to PVG or M for processing, feed a sequencer to Copyist for scoring, use and share, multiple MIDI ports so that ll time related stuff is on one cable, synths and whatever are on other cables… MIDI heaven! This is why I bought, and stuck with, the AMIGA, and when any vendor tries slow this process I get a bit frustrated. Dr.T's makes some fine products, I love KCS, though I seldom use it for 'tracking' anymore. It is still the most powerful and dlexible sequencer available for the Amiga. I also like B&P and Music-X a lot, and use them heavily. I recently saw a demo of Tigre Cub, and I think it could be an excellent starter program. And the copyist is simply brilliant! But I do wish the good Dr was a bit more of a team player. They may have the best system around with MPE and Phantom, nd if they do I hope CBM standardizes it, but in the meantime I wish all the vendors would work together a little closer! ..Bill
#19747From: Phil SaundersOct 30, 1990 2:09 PM
I agree with you (In fact my review of KCS 3.0 in Amazing Computing made many of these same points.) The Synchman plus seems to be one way to get SMPTE to SPP conversion that will work with KCS AND other sequencers. If Dr T supported MTC, there would be no problem. But if other products like Music-X and Bars & Pipes support Phantom SMPTE that will also solve the problem of needing two sync boxes to use different programs–and will also solve the problem of needing tempo maps to convert tempo changes with the Syncman Plus. (That is what's necessary, isn't it?)
#19842From: Bill ThompsonNov 4, 1990 10:33 AM
yes, the syncman, or any timecode box, needes tempo map to convert absolute time (MTC) to relative time (SPP). THe syncman lets you create a tempo map by simply playing the sequence into the syncman. It is really cool! ..Bill
#19849From: Phil SaundersNov 4, 1990 10:24 PM
So you play the sequence, and it creates the tempo map? that's not bad. How is it stored (and where)? Can you upload the tempo map to the sequencer for storage, or do you have to create it each time?
#19890From: Bill ThompsonNov 11, 1990 11:33 PM
you can store the tempo maps in any sequencer that can store SYSEX dumps. You can also store them in MidiQuest. ..Bill