CompuServe Thread

#CrossDOS 1.44M?

6 messages in this thread
#39998From: Donovan WattsNov 8, 1991 5:14 PM
I just read in an ad that CrossDOS can directly read 1.44M MS-DOS disks. I have version 4.0 and I can't read them. I have a 3000. Is it the disk drive? Is there a newer version? >>DonovaN
#40034From: Bruce HoinsNov 9, 1991 8:33 AM
Donovan, Assuming you are using a high density 3 1/2 inch drive then you still need a mountlist for the drive similiar to the mountlist for DI0:. If you only have the stock Amiga drives (880K) you cannot read a Disk formatted for 1.44 megs because the drive won't handle it. CrossDos does not support HD disks because the Amiga does not regularly support HD disks. I hope that answers your question. Bruce H. -Via Whap!
#40061From: Donovan WattsNov 9, 1991 3:50 PM
Thanks Bruce. I have the standard 880K drive. I sure hope CBM comes out with a HD drive sometime soon. >>DonovaN
#40036From: Jeff BrooksNov 9, 1991 8:43 AM
Donovan, I have and am using CrossDOS 4.02a (the upgrade is available from their BBS for download – (313)459-7271 6pm to 10am weekdays 24hr weekends). To quote from the manual: 1.4 Product Limitations High density formatted disks (1.2M and 1.44M disks formatted on the IBM-AT and PS/2) are incapable of being read due to the current limitations in the standard Amiga Hardware. I am also running on a 3000 and am very impressed with the product and the support from Consultorn. Hope this helps Jeff From Upstate SC – via Whap!
#40062From: Donovan WattsNov 9, 1991 3:50 PM
Thanks Jeff, I'll call the BBS number for the upgrade. The manual does say what you quoted. That is why I asked the question. Their add said it *could* directly read 1.44M disks. I guess I have to wait until CBM comes out with HD drives. >>DonovaN
#40134From: Malcolm O'BrienNov 10, 1991 12:27 AM
Donovan, CrossDOS can read 1.44M MS-DOS disks IF they're formatted for 720K! Need new hardware to read the 1.44's. Their are some DOS utilities around that give extra space on standard disks (like 820K on a 720K, not sure of the numbers, a bit more). MS-DOS handles these just fine. Don't know if CrossDOS will though. Malcolm