CompuServe Thread

JPEG

10 messages in this thread
#13135From: Pat CorbittNov 14, 1991 5:01 PM
I'm new here. How does one use that neat little graphics utility called "augjpe.lzh"???? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Pat
#13157From: John GagerNov 15, 1991 2:40 AM
AUGJPE is a BEAR to use Pat 8^) I use Image Professional for most of my JPEG work now, and the new ADPro 2.0 supports JPEG also. But if you really want to use AUGJPE, lets assume you want to decompress a JPEG picture called "PICTURE.JPG". First you need to convert it to PPM format, so from the shell you type: DJPEG PICTURE.JPG >PICTURE.PPM Next, you have to convert the .PPM format file to a 24bit IFF file. So next you would type from the Shell: PPMto24 PICTURE.PPM PICTURE.24 , Now after all that, you still need to convert the 24bit file to something the Amiga can use, like a HAM mode picture. For this you will need something like ImageMaster, ADPro, or a public domain utility that will do the image conversion for you. I'm not sure what PD utilities are available, but you can probably find a few using the keyword IMAGE in the Amiga FileFinder (GO AMIGAFF). If you are serious about JPEG conversion, I would look into purchasing ImageMaster from Black Belt Systems or ADPro 2.0 from ASDG. Both make the JPEG conversion process a whole lot easier, plus lets you convert the images to different formats like HAM, GIF, etc. John – K7KB (via Whap!)
#13190From: SyndesisNov 16, 1991 11:59 AM
I know I've seen it somewhere, but could you give a pointer to where the PPM utilities are stored here in the Amiga areas? If nothing else, it might be nice to re-upload the PPMto24 program as a separate upload, to assist those interested in JPEG.
#13195From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPNov 16, 1991 2:03 PM
If I'm not mistaken, the JPEG utilities include the PPMto24 utility.
#13241From: John GagerNov 17, 1991 1:40 PM
John, the archive AUGJPE.LZH in Library 14 here in Art's contains the PPMto24 and 24toPPM utilities, as well as the JPEG comp/decomp programs. I probably couldn't upload them as separate files because most authors want to keep the archives intact, besides they are not much good without the JPEG utilities also.
#13184From: David McCabeNov 16, 1991 8:56 AM
Pat, I have a script file that uses the augjpe programs and a PD utility called wasp. If you would like, I can EMAIL it to you before I post it here. The only problem is it is very slow and requires about 2M free space on a hard disk AND at least 2M of ram. With more than 4M of ram it is a little faster and doesn't need the hard-disk space. Remember, most JPEG files will decompress to around 1M in size, some even quite a bit bigger than that. David McCabe -via WHAP! from Montreal! :^)
#13247From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPNov 17, 1991 6:07 PM
To Compress to a JPEG image from a 24 bit image: 24toPPM image.24 image.ppm CJPEG >image.jpg image.ppm To Decompress a JPEG image into a 24 bit image: DJPEG >image.ppm image.jpg PPMto24 image.ppm image.24 The 24 bit images are standard 24 bit IFF images, and can be converted to and from using numerous Amiga utilities. Note that the order of the redirection in CJPEG and DJPEG is important: It must occur before the other parameter for it to run properly. One last note: the PPM and 24 bit files take up lots of space. I wouldn't try doing this on a floppy disk, as it probably wouldn't fit.
#13377From: David KieltykaNov 22, 1991 9:29 PM
Steve, >>Note that the order of the redirection in CJPEG and DJPEG is important: It must occur before the other parameter for it to run properly.<< Actually that's not quite true. "CJPEG image.ppm >image.jpg" works just the same as "CJPEG >image.jpg image.ppm". At least this is the case with WShell and the 2.0 Shell. As I recall, tho, the 1.3x Shell/CLI was fussier about such things. The important part is putting the redirection operator before the destination file (image.jpg in this case). Geez, I actually hate nitpicking! <grin> -Dave-
#13414From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPNov 23, 1991 11:25 PM
The 1.3 shell is indeed fussier about such things. Since many (most) people are still using it, I put that note in. In fact, it never even occurred to me to see if 2.0 would accept the other order of parameters, having become so used to the 1.3 order. –>Steve Bennett
#13429From: David KieltykaNov 24, 1991 1:43 PM
Steve, Well, personally I wanna do my bit to kick 1.3 out the back door as soon as possible. 8^) Any time I can put in a plug for 2.0 I'm gonna do it. -Dave-