CompuServe Thread

#CD-Audio making machine?

21 messages in this thread
#30577From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 9, 1992 6:30 AM
David, With the correct software the any of the CD-ROM write once machines will make CD-DA (digital audio) disks. I've seen it advertised as an extra cost option with TOPIX (works with the Philips cutter). Of course you're still a long way from having a recording studio… also be aware that the blank recordable disks cost about $25 in hundreds, so the breakeven point vs. having a regular CD mastered is pretty low. Frank
#30591From: David LigdaNov 9, 1992 9:20 AM
Frank, Thanks for the reply. I am glad you pointed out the costs of blank disks. Seems a little steep but who knows. My application could potentially go through thousands a day so hopefully cost of disks will be less of a factor. Any idea how long it takes to make a CD-DA disk in one of these machines? 10 seconds, 10 minutes, or 10 hours? Thanks again for the information. David
#30651From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 10, 1992 7:16 AM
David, The machines cut at twice the real-time rate, so a one-hour disc would take 30 minutes, plus whatever time it took to mount the tape and start the process (another minute or two). If your application really could use thousands per day you porobasblly should consider getting disks conventionally mastered and pressed. You're looking at about $1200 plus $2.00/disk, and that includes silk screening and such like, which you wouldn't get with a one-off. Alternatively, for strictly audio, consider a DAT. Frank
#30655From: David LigdaNov 10, 1992 8:28 AM
Frank, Thanks again for the input. Frankly, (I couldn't resist <g>) the whole objective of the project is to avoid making a bunch at a time. I need to produce the disks on demand and as fast as possible when needed. Twice real time is pretty good and better than I expected but as with anything in the info biz faster is better. DAT would simplify my life quite a bit but the players do not have the market that CD-Audio does. I don't know a single individual who has one vs not knowing a single person who does not have a CD player. I don't care which format personally but lots of other people do. David
#30672From: Katherine CochraneNov 10, 1992 9:26 AM
David, May I point out that Frank's figures for manufactured CD-ROMs are based on discs all using the same data, not 1000 different one-off CDs? We're discussing custom work vs mass production, and that will always have to be higher priced because of the economy of scale. Kathy <<– The One-Off CD Shop MidSouth, Inc.
#30717From: David LigdaNov 10, 1992 10:18 PM
Kathy, Thanks for the reply. What does the One-Off CD Shop Do? Sounds like you make CD's one at a time. David
#30787From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 12, 1992 8:02 AM
David, I'm intrigued by a market you see for thousands of different disks _per_ day. I can see a "backlist" department in large record stores where people who really wanted something that had too little volume to be stocked could go and order it cut for next day pickup, but I would expect that even the largest stores would have a volume in hundreds not thousands. You would also have to negotiate royalty deals with some of the most fossilized minds that have anything to do with electronics. Those studio lawyers _hate_ new technology. If you can share your idea I'd really be interested in hearing it. Frank
#30880From: David LigdaNov 13, 1992 10:35 AM
Frank, Why stock CD's at all? Why not do everything on demand? My stepfather produces records and always complains that the biggest cost in getting a band going is initial distribution. His eyes lit right up when I said it might be possible to produce the disks as needed at the point of sale. Easy to do demos too (who wants to buy a group they have never heard?). He said if the technology is there he could introduce me to the record bigwigs. So far everyone says it is a good idea but I'm still tracking down the pieces. Putting it all together would be a little piecemeal now. My feeling is that the technology makes it possible but not cost effective now. Who knows what tomorrow will bring. David
#30890From: Albert DayesNov 13, 1992 12:38 PM
I see lawyers for music companies running everywhere to control the music on demmand. <grin>
#31069From: David LigdaNov 16, 1992 9:57 AM
Albert, Interesting point about the lawyers. Not my favorite group of people. Several people have made the comment that on demand might actually be better for the industry since it can be monitored and controlled (in theory) very easily. Just provide an electronic record of all discs that were produced and calculate your royalities. There are a million ways to beat the system but the current system also is not immune to copying, etc. What the recording people tell me is that if it can sell music cheaper (or more of it due to greater variety in any one location) then the lawyers will work it out. Like any business if you can sell it you call the shots. Not a perfect answer and it will be a long hard (expensive) battle. David
#30919From: Rich Bowers/OPANov 13, 1992 10:40 PM
David: You may be right about "on-demand" for the new group just getting off the groud. But there are (at least) two issues you will have to address: 1) the cost (as noted in other messages, the media alone will cost you $25-35 in large quantities, not to mention your recording workstation and personnel costs), and 2) the time required to record the disc may hamper the impulse buy over-the-counter. Rich Bowers
#31068From: David LigdaNov 16, 1992 9:57 AM
Rich, Yeah, you're right on both points (cost, time of production). I figured TOP would be an issue but I didn't think costs would still be so high. The information I have received from this forum has been invaluable. If nothing else it has pinpointed the major issues. I liked Frank's idea about a specialty dealer. For now that seems feasiable based on current limitations. The good news is that (if the past is any predictor of the future in this business) costs and production times will certainly drop as the technology improves. David
#31071From: Rich Bowers/OPANov 16, 1992 10:16 AM
David: Stay tuned here on the Forum for changes, and keep us posted as to your progress. Best of Luck! Rich Bowers
#31053From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 16, 1992 6:41 AM
David, I got into this whole area by having the same idea about books, and I have the same feeling that you do. It's technically feasible, but not yet cost-effective, although, for both of us, I think a mail-order operation for specialty items, in competition with the "Used & Rare" trade might fly. I have also heard that there is one such operation (books, not music) operating in British Columbia, though I got a disconnected number notice when I tried to call their BBS. Frank
#31067From: David LigdaNov 16, 1992 9:57 AM
Frank, I never thought about a used and rare mail order. Might be a good way to get around the cost/time of production issue. At this point it would be a speciality market anyway. BTW, did you want to distribute general titles on CD, technical info., etc.? I have always thought optical media is great until you have to read lots of something. What someone really needs to do is design a reading system (monitor) that looks like a book. Sony's data discman is a step in the right direction but has a ways to go. How did you get around the reader limitation? David
#31138From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 17, 1992 4:54 PM
David, Actually, 5 years ago I was primarily looking for a way to cost-effectively do paper books in onesies (the problem is binding–laser printers are wonderful). I'm primarily looking at small market out-of print stuff. Every real person (ie not somebody's couch potato cousin) I've ever talked to about this could think of half a dozen books in their field of interest that would sell 500 copies immediately and 5 copies per month forever. CDROM would be more of a problem because of the higher cost–I'd need to have several works that a customer wanted, and they'd need to be willing to read it on line. I wouldn't try that yet, but if I was still a bachelor with a day job, I'd likely be starting something with paper. Frank
#31155From: Rich Bowers/OPANov 17, 1992 8:31 PM
Frank: Have you seen the franchised line of kids' books that are individualized with names of the kid and family members? The supplier provides the pages with the color graphics, and the covers. The printer enters the appropriate names into a small database, and laser prints the color pages with the text. For about $15 a copy or so. Clever idea, tho I don't know how much money it makes. As the market matures, you could see the "possibility" of a game disc or some other amusement, produced one-off, that could do special effects and name-insertion is variety of multimedia ways. Kids!? The heck with them! **I** want to my name up in lights! Rich Bowers
#30678From: Torsten DrosteNov 10, 1992 11:32 AM
Hi David, every record process on a double-speed CD-WO machine takes approx. half the time of the playtime printed on the media, e.g. it takes 30 minutes to cut off a CDR-63 and approx. 36 min for a CDR-73. As the Orange Book Part-II is a "kind of extension" of the Red Book a CD-Recordable is measured in minutes. For the media it doesn't matter what's written on it. Therefore your CD-DA takes (playtime/2) minutes for recording, so a 10 minutes song will take about 5 minutes to be recorded. Hope this helps. Torsten
#30716From: David LigdaNov 10, 1992 10:18 PM
Torsten, Thanks for the detail on the process. David
#30671From: Katherine CochraneNov 10, 1992 9:26 AM
Frank, With the minimum run of mastered audio CDs being (usually) 1000, and a setup cost of $800, the break-even point comes at about 20-25 one-off audio discs, although I think our audio one-offs are underpriced given that we have to get some specialized equipment (regular DAT drives require special firmware to premaster Red Book CDs). Kathy <<– The One-Off CD Shop MidSouth, Inc.
#30788From: Frank/Lisa RichardsNov 12, 1992 8:02 AM
Kathy, I had assumed the same minimum run as for a ROM. Any idea why it's different? Thanks for the info. Frank