CompuServe Thread

#040 library

7 messages in this thread
#43937From: Jim MccabeNov 14, 1994 11:05 PM
Does anybody have a 68040.library which is more recent than September 1992 ? A program I'm running is going much slower than expected on my Progressive 040 board, and the author thinks it may be that my 040 library isn't the latest. Thanks.
#43939From: Gary S. CooperNov 15, 1994 12:53 AM
I have 68040.library with the date string 18.1.93 embedded in it, using it my PP&S040 is very fast ( 21 MIPS / 5 MFLOPS ). I do remember problems with earlier versions of this file.
#44003From: Richard BeausangNov 16, 1994 10:53 PM
The odd thing is that the 10/92 version is version 37.4. The one shipping with 3.1 dated 18.1.93 is version 37.3. My progressive board works better with the 10/92 version. -Richard
#44016From: Alan HenryNov 17, 1994 6:28 AM
<<The one shipping with 3.1 dated 18.1.93 is version 37.3.>> PMFJI, but, the 18.1.93 version shipped with 3.1 is 37.30. That is a 30 not a 3. Make sure you are running the most current SetPatch (40.16 – 14.2.94) to properly take advantage of the 68040.library. The newer SetPatch turns on all caches now and moves kickstart into FastRAM without the need for CPU or SetCPU (or similar programs). Alan Henry – Digital Plastic F100-PW-200 Inside
#44107From: Richard BeausangNov 20, 1994 12:38 AM
Whoops… You're absolutely right. It is 37.30. I experimented with different combinations of setpatch and the 68040 library when I first installed 3.1 and incorrectly labelled it. -Richard
#44131From: Jim MccabeNov 20, 1994 4:09 PM
I saw your response on the 68040.library, and I gather that you have installed AmigaDOS 3.1 and that the version of the 68040.library which you got with it is 37.30. My 68040 accelerator is operating very slowly with Lightwave, and I've been told it MAY be due to the old (37.4) version of the 68040.library I've got, but nobody is sure. I've also heard that my A2000 may not run with any versions later than 37.4. I don't want to spend over $200 on 3.1 just to get the library and find out it's not the culprit, or that my A2000 doesn't work with the latest 68040.library. I'd greatly appreciate any help you could give me in this area. Do you have an A2000, and is it running okay with the new library ? Do you know if it's operating faster with math-intensive applications ? Thanks.
#44144From: Richard BeausangNov 21, 1994 2:20 AM
Something makes me doubt that the library is making that much difference. Actually, I have a 3000 with a progressive 040 and didn't get any apreciable speed gains from the new library. Don't have Lightwave but I do use Imagine and a few other programs that are cpu intensive. I dropped the init 040 program from my startup sequence long before upgrading to 3.1. You might try using a different version of setpatch. I dropped the init 040 when I started using setpatch 40.14 which was available here on CIS. Do you have enough 32 bit ram to feed your 040? It could perform rather sluggishly if your using 16 bit ram. Although I'm not as gung ho as others here are on 3.1, you should be able to get it for considerably less than $200. The 3000's upgrade is the most expensive and it was $150 from Expert Services. The 2000 is less than that. Rom replacement isn't that difficult to do yourself. -Richard