#Who's seen RazorPro @AU?
7 messages in this thread
Martin,
>> Any thoughts on what would win a features/useability competition between
Premiere 4 and Razor/Pro?<<
I can't think of anything that Premier can do …. that Razor/Pro can't … but
Razor Pro can do more than Premier … I guess that says it.
Ang
>>I can't think of anything that Premier can do …. that Razor/Pro can't …
Sounds pretty convincing. What about the new Animator Pro. Will this
be competing on the same ground.
Martin
Martin,
>> What about the new Animator Pro. Will this be competing on the same
ground.<<
Not really. The new Animator Studio will be a 32-bit, multilevel paint and
compositing system. Cell animation and paint animation will be its main
features .. with composition a nice addition.
I "cubby hole" Animator Studio .. like other Adesk products … as "content"
developing tools
.. for desktop video .. for MM .. etc. I concider Razor/Premier for compostion
tools into which content from these other packages will be placed. Is that to
say that you couldn't "brute force" Animator Studio into doing some of the same
things and Razor/Premier can do
… well no … but each package will excell at what they do (I hope <G>!).
Ang
Angelo,
>>Not really. The new Animator Studio will be a 32-bit, multilevel paint and
compositing system.
I think this is what I want. Razor/Premiere will composite and work on a
timeline. Photoshop (and many other paint programs) will do fancy things with
pictures. What I need is a Henry on PC. If Animator Studio starts to approach
this angle then it will be a winner.
Martin
Has anyone seen the the nifty transition windows that are in the
advertisements. BTW- I haven't been able to get any of the Photoshop
filters(which are supported) to work through the effects library either.
-Jack
Jack,
Are we having fun Yet ???? : )
B-
I've been following this thread now for a couple of weeks. I was just
wondering if you've worked out the problem with Razor Pro/PAR
regarding the corrupt frames that resulted after compositing in the
program, and recompressing in .ani format. I'm planning to purchase
the program in a few weeks, and was just curious about this "bug",
and if it has been corrected- or if you've discovered where the
problem was/is. You said that you suspect it occured because of the
recompression after compositing- does Jamie Carr know about this
problem?? It seems to me that one of Razor Pro's biggest "claims to
fame" is its ability to work with the PAR's .ani format directly-
does it work well or are there problems?? I haven't read anything
else about this, so I just thought I'd ask. Thanks- Kathleen