CompuServe Thread

#Scanner

5 messages in this thread
#42366From: Bill ReevesDec 3, 1991 11:07 AM
I am interested in scanning input device for A2000 and in information about same. If anyone has one for sale, or if anyone would care to make a recommendation I would appreciate it. I have DigiView (current version) but want more resolution at a reasonable cost. Thanks. Bill Reeves
#42380From: J.R. BOOKWALTERDec 3, 1991 4:27 PM
I'll make a recommendation: the Epson ES-300C with ASDG's driver software for AdPro (it also includes a stand-alone version). 24 bit color, 8 bit gray scale, 8.5 x 11 flatbed scanner, it's AWESOME! Only $999 in USAFlex's latest ad in PC Sources. ASDG's software retails for $200; most dealers sell it for $150 or so. If you don't believe me, ask anyone in the ASDG forum! 🙂 J.R. P.S.: And no, I won't sell mine! 🙂
#42422From: John PendergrassDec 4, 1991 12:15 AM
Bill, I saw that someone else recommended the Epson 300ES scanner and ADPro software. If you need that quality, I'd agree that it is the way to go. Great scans and software. But, what are you scanning for? Publishing or video? It makes a difference, to me at least. I scan images almost exclusively for video/computer display (for anims, interactive screens, etc), and use the Sharp JX-100 scanner with the ADPro software. The Sharp JX-100 offers a 6"x4" scanning area (not hand held – you lay the scanner on top of the image), at 200DPI, with 18bit color resolution. If you think about it, a 3"x2" image just fills a hires screen (approx 600×400 or so). Most of the source I scan is 3"x2" or so, so the 200DPI isn't a limitation. And re color, the difference between 18bit color and 24bit color when converted to amiga resolutions is pretty small… 🙂 The Sharp JX-100 costs in the $600-700 range (I think). You'd have to purchase the ADPro software as well. You give up the 300DPI, the 24bit color and the full-size scans to save a few hundred dollars. Worked well for me. For publishing purposes I think I'd go with the Epson. For video, the Epson would still be more flexible, but does cost more. Depends on what you want…. my thoughts, anyway. –jp–seattle–
#42439From: Bill ReevesDec 4, 1991 8:32 AM
J.R. and jp, Thanks to both of you for your responses. My most immediate use of a scanner would be for publishing. I would like to add some personalized graphics to a set of manuals for my office (being done in WP5.1 on a clone). I use my Amiga mostly for video and so I want to use the scanner for that as well. Incidentally, I have been offered a Canon IX 12 (?) full page gray scale scanner for $399. Does anyone know anything about them. I haven't found any info on them in Amiga literature (AC buyers guide, for example). Bill
#42453From: Michael GerardDec 4, 1991 1:41 PM
Bill, I use the Canon IX-12 scanner. It's ok for publishing. The only software and interface available for it are Gold Disk's ProScan interface and software, which does NOT support grey scale… just halftone type dithering. I paid $199 for the scanner (from IME in Boston) and $149 for the ProScan stuff from Gold Disk. The Gold Disk software doesn't work very well under 2.04, and Gold Disk has no intention of further developing its offering (read that: ORPHANED). While the system has served me well for about 2 years now, I wouldn't make the same purchase decision again. Today I'd definately opt for a full page color scanner supported by ASDG (hint, hint). The only drawback (IMHO) to the ASDG software is that while it will scan in 8 bit grey scale, it won't scan in 1 bit B&W for line art… however this is minor, since you can tweek all you want in AdPro. By the way, JR also used to have the IX-12/ProScan setup prior to getting his Epson/ASDG package. I'm sure he can give you a better run down on it than I can. – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael