CompuServe Thread

ADPro Interface

20 messages in this thread
#31935From: Jim OgilvieDec 19, 1991 7:40 PM
Perry… Just a question about the file requestors, and user interface in general. I was at my local dealer today, playing with ADP2 (mine's not here yet) and pondered the question as to why the user interface is in low rez. Is it to save chip ram? If you were to go to a high res interface, anything that required a file requestor type gadget (scrolling lists for operators, loaders and savers, and of course, a file requestor itself) would be able to display significantly more items on the list. For example, you could probably quite easily get all of the loaders and savers on a single reqestor with no scrolling needed on a higher resolution version of the user interface. It would be nice to have this as an option, I guess. What do you think? Jim
#32066From: ASDGDec 21, 1991 12:25 PM
That's certainly true Jim. Future incarnations of ADPro will probably change. The current low resolution user interface screen is, by-and-large, a hold over for historical reasons. pk
#32087From: Jim OgilvieDec 21, 1991 7:20 PM
Perry.. Good stuff. I wonder if it would be worth while having some sort of patch available that offers no changes to the program itself, just the user interface. I think it would. That is, make it available for those who don't mind spending the extra bytes out of chip ram needed to support such a display. Any plans to support new video modes under 2.04? (i.e. save a screen to productivity mode, etc). Actually, I wonder if having some 'preset' buttons like they have in Imagine, would be a good idea. (i.e. hotkey type buttons that set your 'scale' operator resolution to ham, ham-lace, low, hi res, etc.) Jim
#32171From: ASDGDec 22, 1991 11:44 PM
Re: New Video Modes…I'll let you in on a secret…ADPro 2XX already supports more video modes than meets the eye. The modes kick in automatically on machines which support them. pk
#32242From: Jonathan HirschmanDec 24, 1991 1:25 AM
pk– OK, first I was teased by your manual, now I am teased by your message to Mr. Ogilvie. Perhaps this question will skirt any legalities that may otherwise prevent you from answering the magic question: * When do you expect that users will be using ADPro's "secret" modes? * What kind of video modes will kick in automatically, in ADPro? Dying to know, Jonathan – via Whap!
#32259From: ASDGDec 24, 1991 11:36 AM
I can't tell you about most of them. But some of them I can mention…support for SuperHiRes and Productivity mode on machines which support them. The other modes (which are all in there and working) can't be described. pk
#32275From: Michael GerardDec 24, 1991 3:58 PM
"The other modes (which are all in there and working) can't be described." ^ " Hmmm… must be hard to document something that you can't describe. 🙂 – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#32291From: Jim OgilvieDec 24, 1991 10:12 PM
Perry… I was at the dealer's today using his A3000. I'm not sure what I was doing wrong, but I could only get the upper button to display low, high, and superhi resolution. How do you get productivity mode? It's not important to me, just a passing curiosity. I can't see a situation where I would need such an image. Jim
#32299From: ASDGDec 25, 1991 12:18 AM
Productivity mode is in the left hand button on the lower row. If you machine supports it…it will say: NTSC, PAL, VGA. The VGA signifies productivity mode. pk
#32349From: Jim OgilvieDec 26, 1991 1:39 PM
Ah. Ok. I imagine you have to have one of the 'monitors' in your WB startup drawer to get it to work. I noticed they took theirs out, for some reason, and as a result I guess that productivity wouldn't be 'available' unless you ran one of those monitors. Jim
#32367From: ASDGDec 26, 1991 9:25 PM
That is correct. pk
#32122From: John PendergrassDec 22, 1991 11:52 AM
I'm probably barking up the wrong tree, but I'd personally like ADPro to open on the Workbench, rather than it's own screen. If I had a choice it would stay about the same relative size, so that it would occupy about 1/4 of a WB hires/interlace screen. Even less on an oversized screen. That would be the MOST memory efficient way to go, and make it easier to work with as well, IMHO. Of course you'd have to open screens for the custom WYSIWYG graphics operations….
#32373From: Karl SparklinDec 26, 1991 10:57 PM
Perry, Please give a lot of thought to interlace flicker if you feel you must go to high-res for the ADPro screen in the future. I would much rather it remain lo-res, though the it makes the font look pretty rough on my 19" monitor. Most people don't take the time to make interlace screens look good on non-flicker-fixed systems, assuming that everyone should just get a flicker-fixer. Single horizontal lines and all that. Just an opinion. Karl – via Whap!
#32385From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiDec 27, 1991 9:13 AM
Karl, Actually, I'd just like ADPro to open on the Workbench screen. I think ADPro's only real failing is the low-res screen–with 200 lines of resolution and an 11-point system font, you only get *7* files and devices showing in the requester at a time… On a laced screen I wouldn't be doing so much futzing with scroll bars. By opening ADPro in a window on a workbench screen (and it would fit right now without changing a thing on the interface 😉 , then you could stick with medium-res and I'd get high-res. That'd be perfect.
#32394From: John PendergrassDec 27, 1991 7:28 PM
That's what I want too. If they just kept the same size window, it would fit very nicely on my WB hires-interlace screen! Just 1/4 sized! And put a little zoom box on it, so that I can move it out of the way temporarily, too. That would be ideal for me. I like things on my WB whenever practical. –jp–seattle–
#32504From: Steve TibbettDec 30, 1991 11:08 AM
I wrote a hack a week or so ago that let you open ADPro on the Workbench screen in a draggable window. Aside from the colours being wrong, my WB screen not being deep enough, and ADPro popping it's screen to the front all the time – it was pretty cool. (No I don't plan to release it – I just wanted to see how it would look). Hope ASDG makes WB operation part of ADPro, though. …Steve
#32415From: Lee BoschDec 28, 1991 3:34 PM
I think the interface is just fine. I would appreciate a file requester that put directories first though. Khalid's requester works really well from that standpoint and when I'm really hopping around, I will substitute it. Also, it would be real nice if the save requester could use the most recently loaded image name as a default. I remember seeing this comment before, but I thought bore repeating. Another brilliant idea: Save the current source directory with all the other configuration information. I sincerely doubt that anyone stores their images in the ADPro directory. So, anything noteworthy planned for the update next year? Lee Bosch – via Whap!
#32452From: John PendergrassDec 29, 1991 1:21 PM
Lee, I always load ADPro from the CLI. The default LOAD directory in that case is the directory you started from. I like that. I suppose putting a TOOLTYPE in the Icon would be ok, so that when launched from the WB it would go to that default dir? ie. TOOLTYPE LoadDir=dh1:24pics SaveDir=dh1:24pics would cause those to be used. I suppose you could do pretty much the same thing via an ARexx macro? Have you tried this? –jp–seattle–
#32633From: Jim SakladJan 1, 1992 12:42 AM
Could write a script file, name it ADP24, set the script bit: CD dh1:24bitPix Run ADPro:ADPro CD SYS: . . . . . JimDoc
#32482From: ASDGDec 30, 1991 12:42 AM
Re: Update next year…couldn't comment on that left we spoil the surprise. There is now an ARexx command which will return the name of the last image loaded or saved. You can integrate this into an ARexx program which could make use of this information. pk