CompuServe Thread

An introduction.

2 messages in this thread
#656From: Patrick JenningsDec 22, 1994 7:56 AM
<sigh> It was about 5 or 6 years ago that everyone was lamenting the _addition_ of INI files to the already deplorable state of CONFIG and AUTOEXEC files in PC computing. The NT registry is a cool and beautiful thing. Everything you want to know about your system is accessible from a single location; no more sysedit with all those bloody windows but not one of them WORD6.INI. Changing/adding values in the registry can have immediate results. All your programs can access and share the information in it, or build on it, knowing their affecting the _current_ state of the machine. In fact, programs running on other computers can access and share the information in it, or build on it. And it's really _fun_ to write code that does just that. Once you get the hang of it, managing a database is way easier and less problematic than maintaining a bunch of text files. ASCII is archaic. The INI is dead, dead, DEAD. Hurrah! Patrick.
#683From: SyndesisDec 22, 1994 12:25 PM
I certainly know the downside of ASCII INI files, too. Although I haven't had to add WinNT-specific registry code to any apps I've worked on, I don't even know where the registry info is kept, and I doubt I can load it into a text editor. That's what I meant about simplicity of ASCII INI files. Why, even Unix has ASCII "dot" files for configuring everything under the sun. 🙂