CompuServe Thread

Street Atlas USA

21 messages in this thread
#160413From: Lanny R. ReamDec 26, 1994 9:15 PM
Doug and all, I just gained a new respect for DeLorme's Street Atlas USA and related programs. Rudy Tschernich (author of Zeolites of the World) called today and told me that he has been using Street Atlas in conjunction with "Map Expert" which is an overlay program allowing one to make notes on an overlay to the maps of Street Atlas. One can also draw in side roads, trails, pits, etc. to make your mineral localities. He said that Street Atlas has the same detail as the state "Atlas & Gazeteers" except there are no contour lines. I've noticed that the atlases have fairly good detail of back roads and features (few trails). One can enter the GPS location data and Map Expert will plot the location on the overlay. This appears to be a pretty good system for plotting/recording mineral localities. Especially with the ability to draw in locality info and tie the locality to the lat/lon from GPS. Also, you can go along a route, clicking on points turnoffs etc. and it will calculate the mileage. Unfortunately for me, Map Expert is not available for the Mac. Also, he has been using Global Explorer which is a map atlas of the world. It has pretty good detail, but not quite as good as Street Atlas and is actually designed for the traveler with airline routes and the like. Along this same line of thinking: I just received (love Christmas!) the Atlas and Gazeteer of Washington and find it much better than Idaho. Idaho is at 1:250,000 scale and does not have sections, T&R indicated. Washington is at 1:150,000 and has sections and T&R. This larger scale makes the Washington Atlas a larger book (119 maps as compared to 63 for Idaho) and individual sections are over 3/8 inch across at that scale. Pretty good detail, hope they redo Idaho! Lannyh
#160535From: Russ MadsenDec 28, 1994 12:13 AM
Lanny… Your comments about Street Atlas USA provide me a new perspective… I have DeLorme's maps of California and know for certain that they make little distinction between paved roads and goat trails. Not much help when we're trying to choose motorcycling routes for an ST1100 sport touring bike, thus I had decided not to bother getting the software. The idea of using it to plot offroad mineral sites etc makes it worth a second look…
#160653From: Lanny R. ReamDec 29, 1994 12:07 AM
Russ, The failure of DeLorme to add some real distinctive difference in road quality/grade can be a pain. I notice they do make an effort to dash some lines, etc. but a little more would help. It really is fun to go into an area with a lot of roads where one of them is a major road (pave or not) and the others are really secondary to it but you can't tell which one on the map is the main one because of all the intersections, turns etc. But, that is certainly better then those mountain/logging roads not even being on the map! Rudy said that he found it better when they didn't put all the roads and trails on because it made it easier to draw the road, trail, pit or whatever of interest was there. Hope they make Map Works for the Mac soon. Lanny
#160779From: Doug MitchellDec 29, 1994 11:03 PM
Hi, Lanny– That is another advantage to electronic versions I neglected to mention, and there are likely more I have not thought of. With a little luck, you can turn your annotations on and off when looking at the map; with a lot of luck, maybe you can E-mail them to another DeLorme user and thus allow the recipient to use them easily. –Doug
#160964From: David A. StuartDec 31, 1994 10:49 AM
Forgive me for barging in here, but I've been researching a problem you may be able to help solve. The problem is this. Suppose there are two or three thousand individuals carrying GPS receivers around the country. Their mission is to inspect manhole covers. Also, suppose there are millions of automobiles, each with a GPS receiver, passing over manhole covers. I want the frequency with which automobiles pass over manhole covers (should I be calling these person-hole covers? Anyway…). If I assign, from a pallet of 255 colors, the range of possible frequencies, and bring up a map of the US, I should see various colors indicating the information I want. Question #1: Is there a current source for the lat/long of manhole covers? Question #2: Is there a current package that allows me to plot values by lat/long, over a map? Any suggestions would be most welcome. Thanks. David Stuart.
#161237From: Doug MitchellJan 2, 1995 8:17 PM
Hi, David– Welcome to the forum! I do not have much of a handle on that problem, though I am not sure I understand it completely. Why would the fact that the autos have GPS receivers be relevant? When you mention assigning colors to frequencies, I assume you talking about coloring roads on a map according to the frequencies of auto use on each road. If one could obtain that frequency information, and locations of all manholes, one could get a good sense of manhole pass-over counts. But where that info may lurk, I have only the vaguest of notions. Utility companies and traffic departments seem to be the only likely sources – I do not know where or whether to find them on the Internet, and whether they would be willing to sell such info cheaply. GO BIZFILE offers a "yellow pages" sort of service for most cities in the U.S. if you want to try calling them all (whew!). Perhaps a call to your local outfits might produce word of some national clearinghouse they all use? As for software to plot all this, we have just discovered Map Expert (or whatever the name is), which may not be in the league of what you need, but then again I have not met it. Well, keep watching this space, maybe someone else has a better idea. We have seen an occasional geographer here. When I get home, my Internet book may list some geography resources – I may need a reminder to check this. –Doug
#161383From: David A. StuartJan 3, 1995 8:45 PM
Thanks very much for your reply. This is a very interesting problem I have distilled into a simple case in order to find some basic answers. The actual problem I'm trying to solve is rather involved. Still, I appreciate very much your response. I'm interested in all mapping software. Ideally, a package with any kind of geocode reference for roads, buildings, monuments, landmarks, or other items would be most helpful. Thanks again. David Stuart
#162072From: Doug MitchellJan 7, 1995 8:03 PM
Hi, David– I have returned and looked up geography resources on the Internet. None of the descriptions sound like what you are after, and none seem to be places for further answers, but just in case: CIA World Factbook Anon. FTP: ucselx.sdsu.edu /pub/doc/etext/world.text.Z Earth (fact book & map) Anon. FTP: nic.funet.fi /pub/world/* European Postal Codes Anon. FTP: nic.funet.fi /pub/doc/mail/stamps/* Geography Server telnet: martini.eecs.umich.edu 3000 Global Land Information System (geo survey maps of US) telnet: glis.cr.usgs.gov login: guest U.S. Geographic Name Server gopher.gsfc.nasa.gov Zip Codes of the U.S. Anon. FTP: oes.orst.edu /pub/data/zipcode –Doug
#161126From: Lanny R. ReamJan 1, 1995 11:19 PM
Hi Doug, Actually that overlay program is called Map Expert (apparently) (not Map Works as I wrote), it isn't available for the Mac (yet) so I can't actually look it up. It would be likely that the overlay would be saved as a file that could be sent anywhere files can travel. I wonder if one had Street Atlas but not Map Expert if the file could be used in printing a map (an overlay perhaps to a paper copy of a Street Atlas map) if it could be saved in a more common format like Freehand or Illustrator (or even EPS). We are slowly getting to real useful tools. Lanny
#161235From: Doug MitchellJan 2, 1995 8:16 PM
Hi, Lanny– With Windows, I can select a printer driver for a printer I do not have, but which is widely useful, like HPGL (HP Plotter), and print to a file. That HPGL file can then be sent to others and is then useful in many advanced word processors and other applications as a graphic. Perhaps I can do EPS the same way. It is a bit clumsy in that the first time I must install the driver from the installation diskette, but once set up, I can repeat it easily. This driver-to-file trick should work for most any Windows application, whether it provides methods or not, inlcuding Map Expert (or whatever). –Doug
#161604From: Lanny R. ReamJan 4, 1995 11:37 PM
Hi Doug, Never actually thought of doing it that way, but it would work the same on a Mac, although it could be difficult getting the printer drivers. Apparently, some programs can open and manipulate EPS files and some can only print them. So far, I've used them, generally don't like them because the tend to be huge. I called De Lorme today (1-800-452-5931) and the salesrep didn't think a Mac version of Map Expert was in the works. Hope she is wrong!
#161660From: Bill WestcottJan 5, 1995 10:48 AM
>> ….salesrep didn't think a Mac version of Map Expert was in the works. << Lanny — Better stuff than MapExpert is on the way. A software company is putting USGS topo's on CDROM which will be readable by Macs. They are sending me some info but I was asked not to post any info on who the company is at least till I talk to their marketing guy who should be back next week. If anyone is planning to buy a Trimble ScoutMaster soon, let me know. I have some info on why to buy now and the availability of Mac software for the ScoutMaster. — Bill
#161948From: Lanny R. ReamJan 6, 1995 11:26 PM
Bill, That sounds interesting. It is about time, hopefully it will be done at a price us poor working stiffs can afford. We await your posting more information when available. Having just bought a Scout, couldn't possible buy a ScoutMaster, but am interested in the information. Lanny
#162100From: Bill WestcottJan 8, 1995 12:17 AM
Lanny — Hopefully,I will have some more info on the topo map CDROM next week. Two of the main features on the ScoutMaster haven't been implemented yet and when they are, there will be a price increase. Trimble will update the ones shipped before then for free. The software for transferring data to & from a Mac is ready now and the first Mac > ScoutMaster I/O cables should be delivered next week. There are no plans to ever do the Scout-It-Out software for the Mac but 3rd party vendors are working on more powerful software than Scout-It-Out. — Bill
#161726From: SyndesisJan 5, 1995 6:17 PM
That's because EPS files are a subset of PostScript, and some EPS files are actually structured even further into stnadards such as the Adobe Illustrator file format. Unfortunately, this blurs the distinction between the formats. There are ways to turn general PostScript (the most super-set) into other standard, editable file formats, like AI EPS, DXF or plotter-language HPGL, but they require specialized tools. If you ever need this done, keep me in mind, I'm a master of conversions and file formats – it's what I do for a living.
#161949From: Lanny R. ReamJan 6, 1995 11:26 PM
John, Thanks. If needed I shall call. I have a program called Graphic Converter that converts a large list of DOS, Amiga, etc. formats to each other and Mac compatibility, but don't recall that it can touch EPS. So far it has been a big help (made it possible for my Mac to read the USGS CD-ROM of mining photos (USGS DDS-12) which was made for DOS machines. And it has been helpful making the GIF files to upload here. Speaking of GIF, saw a message (actually a lot of them) in one of the Mac.COM Newsgroups that Compuserve has decided to require everyone to pay royalties for using the GIF format. Amazing how there hasn't been anything on Compuserve about this. Lanny
#161997From: Tom LeCompte-SysopJan 7, 1995 11:44 AM
The Graphics forums have been abuzz with the Unisys-Compuserve-LZW-GIF issue.
#162013From: SyndesisJan 7, 1995 2:57 PM
The GIF business is quite a brou-ha-ha, and I don't think all the dust has settled. There has been a lot of info on CIS, but it's in the graphics developer -type forums. In short, Unisys claims a patent on a data compression scheme, GIF uses it, and Unisys has CIS against the wall, and CIS may start exacting a royalty from commercial products that use GIF files. Freeware is exempt.
#162402From: Lanny R. ReamJan 9, 1995 10:58 PM
John, Apparently it won't be long until decisions are made, then we will see something happen at our level one way or another. There must be some effect on us if we are going to send GIF files up and down the CIS connection. Lanny
#162101From: Bill WestcottJan 8, 1995 12:17 AM
>>Speaking of GIF, saw a message (actually a lot of them) in one of the Mac.COM Newsgroups that >>Compuserve has decided to require everyone to pay royalties for using the GIF format. Amazing how >>there hasn't been anything on Compuserve about this. Lanny — CIS isn't going to require everyone to pay royalties for using the GIF format. The following is a paragraph from the GIF Developer Agreement Update I found on the CIS World Wide Web page, (HTTP:\\WWW.COMPUSERVE.COM). >>CompuServe remains committed to keeping open the GIF 89a specification both within CompuServe and >>in areas outside CompuServe. CompuServe continues to strongly support the use of the GIF >>specification in the entire online community including the Internet and World Wide Web. This >>agreement will be transparent to end-users and will not result in any charges for people using >>viewers or transmitting GIF images. >>Tim Oren, >>CompuServe Vice President, Future Technology — Bill
#162399From: Lanny R. ReamJan 9, 1995 10:58 PM
Bill, When the dust settles, the royalty business will reach us all to some extent. That is a neat trick–let everyone use it for years, then start talking about the patent and go for the royalty! Lanny