CompuServe Thread

#ACAD 3rd Party Fonts

8 messages in this thread
#34233From: TOM TORREFeb 22, 1992 11:03 PM
All, I am looking for a third party ACAD developer that offers better looking ACAD fonts (comparable to ROMANT) but with less of a byte count per font file. I beleive ROMANT is around 4.8K and that really ups my drawing file size. I tried changing my Standard font from ROMANT to Acad's default and while it does make the regen/redraw time faster, the text justification changes in the attributes and is very difficult to read. So I'm back to ROMANT and suffer the consequences of sacrificing speed. I need the clarity of ROMANT as this drawing file is published and sent out for distribution throughout my company…Any help would be most appreciated -Tom
#34312From: Bill ValaskiFeb 23, 1992 6:32 PM
Tom, I hate to tell you this, but the size of the font file doesn't affect the size of the drawing file – only the text that you type within it. Just like a shape entity, only a "placeholder" for the shape is kept within the drawing database. When AutoCAD load the drawing containing the shape (or text), AutoCAD also loads the shape definition so it knows how to draw the entity. As far as speeding up your regen time, which _is_ affected by the size of the font file (larger filey typically contain more complex letters), have you tried using the QTEXT command? This will replace all text entities within a drawing with "boxes" that show where the text originally was. Unfortunaely, this doesn't help your situation because the QTEXT boxes are seldom the size of the original text. One possible work around might be the uncompile the ROMANT shape file (there's a program in the Utilities library called SHP2SHX) and replace each letter with a simple box set to the original letter's dimensions. Then simply replace the existing ROMANT text style with your modified ROMANT style. Bill
#34323From: Tony Tanzillo [LISP TM]Feb 23, 1992 7:29 PM
Bill – I think Tom was referring to the amount of memory that a drawing file consumes when it is loaded into the editor. The complexity of the fonts used will have an effect on that. -TonyT.
#34484From: TOM TORREFeb 24, 1992 5:16 PM
Tony, You're right, I was looking for a less complex font (for performance sake) and the clarity for the drawing to go into a publication. I use PRPLOT to a HPIII for each page. Thanks for the help again…Tom
#34483From: TOM TORREFeb 24, 1992 5:16 PM
Bill, Thanks for the reply, but Tony T. is right, I want to try to reduce the amount of memory that the font takes up. I guess if I want the clarity of the ROMANT font I will have to suffer with the font degradation to the system…I will check out QTEXT thought..Thanks again..Tom
#34336From: Dennis W. BanaszakFeb 23, 1992 8:50 PM
Tom, Since ROMANT is a triplex, or triple stroke font, every letter gets three passes from the pen. Try switching to ROMANS, this is a simplex font that only makes one pass per letter. Using a heavier pen should give you the clarity that you need. The more text you put into a drawing, the greater the drawing size will become. Each stroke in a line of text counts just as much as the longest line in the drawing. The TXT font that the STANDARD style uses IS the most expeditious font you can use. What you can do is utilize that font with whatever style you use as you build the drawing, then when you're ready to plot the file, change the font back to ROMANS (or ROMANT) prior to plotting. Doing this will change all the text using that style to the new font. Good Luck, Dennis
#34485From: TOM TORREFeb 24, 1992 5:16 PM
Dennis, I failed to mention that this drawing consists of (21) 8.5" x 11" pages – side by side. I use PRPLOT to a HPIII for each page, so you can see how cumbersome this can be. The HP gives me good clarity and the ROMANT resembles a Times Roman Font for publication. I appreciate any ideas that you have given me and from all of the other Forum Members as well..Thanks again….Tom
#34546From: Dennis W. BanaszakFeb 24, 1992 9:36 PM
Tom, I see, you need the serif. Have you tried any of the drivers that give you linewidths on the LJIII? Dennis