CompuServe Thread

#Video Toaster advice

5 messages in this thread
#37542From: Charles BlaquiereJan 12, 1994 10:37 PM
Vance, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ultra-high quality image in seaQuest and Babylon V animations a result of dumping the 24-bit image data in digital format, onto an Exabyte tape drive, to be read by a digital recorder? If so, the Toaster's framebuffer & video encoder aren't used at all, and you can't judge the Toaster's output by oohing at TV sci-fi animations. And what's this about the Alpha channel being used for things like sound effects? Alpha channels are used to specify transparency, to anti-alias object edges or provide semi-transparent, network sports-like overlays. Finally, the Toaster was used in the past elections??? Wow! Where? What network? Blaq!
#37552From: Vance SchowalterJan 13, 1994 12:27 AM
Yes, that sounds correct. They usually transfer everything to film, though, as some countries show reconstructed series as films in their movie houses. I was simply making the point that the Toaster's output is broadcast quality, albeit composite. I'm fairly certain that both you and I are both approximately correct concerning alpha channels. In the January 1994 issue of VTU, an article states use of the Toaster in covering the federal elections in Montreal and showing a Toaster freeze frame of Jean Chretien with graphic overlays. It looked really nice. It was produced by Tele-Metropole Inc. (CFTM). -= Vance =- Image Master Flying high on Black Belt Systems' Imagemaster R/t!
#37677From: Anthony RamirezJan 16, 1994 1:37 PM
>isn't the ultra-high quality image in seaQuest and Babylon V animations a >result of dumping the 24-bit image data in digital format, if so, the >Toaster's framebuffer & video encoder aren't used at all. While it is true that ALL the CG action scenes are dumped via Abekas the displays inside the seaQuest are HAM8 realt-time playbacks of the Amiga. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#37938From: Joel ProvostJan 25, 1994 4:56 PM
>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.) I would say, any render time > 1/30th of a second needs acceleration. Ok Fine… Joel
#37948From: Anthony RamirezJan 25, 1994 9:54 PM
>I would say, any render time > 1/30th of a second needs acceleration. At first I had that but then realized that even when it is `fast enough' it still isn't `fast enough'. :^) <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)