CompuServe Thread

#TV1024

15 messages in this thread
#80097From: Dan KemmisJan 31, 1994 1:43 PM
Hey… Help me… Please… I've a customer with a TV1024 board. Coll, but never realy that cool… Since I don't have one setting around, I thought I'd ask the questions about drivers for this pup. It's a darned $$$ Tseng4000 card with a 1/2 mb of ram (owe) or its Truevisions power board with no drivers? Does that jive with the forums understanding? Could an Adesk suport guy clear this up? Does anyone make drivers for the TV1024 board for V3? Needing help and willing to pay… Dr Pixel
#80102From: Brian Rudolph [Adesk]Jan 31, 1994 2:11 PM
Dan, I don't know about the TV1024 either. If it truly an ET4000 based board like their other TV-NTSC board, then you can select Tseng 4000 in the VIBCFG setup and it will work fine. If it is not based on the ET4000, then I don't know. You might want to ask this question over in the Truevision forum. (GO TARGA) for the definitive answer. (Always go to the source when you can.) -Brian
#80140From: Dan KemmisJan 31, 1994 6:06 PM
Brian… Thanks for the input. The TV1024 is a HR Windows display that never did much for me. My customer got his from some dealer in CA who told him "this will make 3ds very cool"… What a joke. The board has only 512k VGA ram and 3.5 mb of "other" ram for windows stuff. I've never got mine to run well with windows, and it's so slow for 3ds… You guys are cool. The realtime support via cserve is top notch! Keep up the good work and tell Nik he's 2/3rds as cool as you… As for the 1024, without v3 drivers, who cares… 1/3rd as cool as Nik Dr Pixel
#80113From: CSA/CAJan 31, 1994 3:12 PM
Dan, I thought you guys were Truevision dealers. The TV1024-32 has both a Tseng Labs ET4000 (512k) and a 34020 (which gets the rest of the memory on the board. You can run the VGA side using standard ET4000 drivers, including through the VESA driver that Truevision supplies. Truevision's RDPADI for 3D Studio only functions properly with 3DS R2, but they are working on a R3 driver (a few other driver projects pushed it to a back burner). BTW, the 1024XP is a different board, based on 3 S3 chips – similar to the RasterOps Paintboard PC. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#80139From: Dan KemmisJan 31, 1994 6:00 PM
Kevin… I am a Truevivion dealer… As you know, some of the best info does not come from the manufacturer… As for the questions, you've confirmed what I was thinking. The TV1024 is a very expensive ET4000 board until the V3 drivers are done… I think I'll tell the customer to sell off the 1024 and get some cool, low cost stuff… Thanks for the help, you must be a dealer… Dealing, but not dealt Dr Pixel
#80158From: CSA/CAJan 31, 1994 7:34 PM
Dan, Just pulling your leg. Aren't you NW Tech? If so, you and CSA were part of the same Truevision Master Dealer Council. Also, maybe the Tektronix Dealer Council? Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#80307From: Dan KemmisFeb 1, 1994 10:52 AM
Owe… You tug like a man! Ok, enough funny stuff! The 1024 board is going to be sold "down the river." A 512k ET4000 board that cost about $2,000 seems a little odd… So the question needs to be asked on this cool forum… What is the coolest Studio board (regaurdless of cost… like that makes it a fair questions…) any of the users use? Comments, questions and rude remarks welcome! Curiosity burnt up the pixel. Dr Pixel
#80541From: Conrad StolzeFeb 2, 1994 2:15 AM
Distinguished Dr., I have a Diamond Viper (fortunately one of the old Weitek VGA chipset ones that work with 3DS) and it is KILLER! Main Display in 1280 x 1024 x 256 and _fast_ even without Liquid Speed (budget problem <G>). I have my Materials Editor at 640 x 480 x 24bit, and my rendering screen at 800 x 600 x 24bit. With the rendering screen at 800 x 600, I can render (sometimes with "strange" aspect ratios) 640×480 VGA, 512×486 TGA, 720×486 CCIR 601, and 752×486 Vista resolution images and _never_ reconfigure (isnt there a saying about never?). BUT, from what I have seen on the Matrox boards in ACAD and Windows, the jury is still out. If their performance in 3DS is anywhere near ACAD and WIN, they will be the board to beat! (IMHO) Chuck
#80665From: Feb 2, 1994 10:40 AM
>> 752×486 Vista resolution Strange, my Vista does 756×486. Or did you mean 752×480 PAR resolution, which also works? <g>
#80804From: Conrad StolzeFeb 2, 1994 8:12 PM
Greg, >> Strange, my Vista does 756×486. Or did you mean 752×480 PAR resolution, which also works? << I think that was the result of all these darn numbers running together after a while, or is that the resolution of the new PARista? <BG> Chuck
#81095From: david W. mennenohFeb 3, 1994 6:02 PM
Greg, When you render for the PAR do you render to fields or not? Dave
#81193From: Feb 4, 1994 2:30 AM
Dave: Yes, the PAR plays back at 752x480x24bit, 60 fields per second! Fields always look better than frames to any device that can handle them! Greg Pyros
#81511From: Dan KemmisFeb 5, 1994 2:01 PM
Master… So you are working in the field of dreams… Hey… Would you care to say when you the cool par might be shipping? And does Chuck really drink a bottle of Gin every 3 hours? That is a bunch of Gin… Gin and bearing it… The lost Pixel…
#81640From: Feb 6, 1994 1:31 PM
Big guy: The PAR should be shipping within _days_ now. Can't wait! Yes, that's what keeps Chuck awake for his late night CI$ sessions. Have you been looking at the time on most of his messages? Greg Pyros
#80195From: John TissavaryJan 31, 1994 10:18 PM
Good advice. I tried that card for a couple of days last year and really hated it. It was pretty slow in Windoze, too. John Tissavary (La Luna cie)