CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Amiga at Work

#2000 Harddrives

5 messages in this thread
#123436From: pam smithMay 9, 1988 10:56 PM
So will it live compatibly with a RLL format? Or is the FFS its own private format?
#123503From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 10, 1988 2:15 AM
RLL and FFS are completely separate issues. RLL is the method of writing data to the disk, and FFS the way the data is sent to the disk. In other words, RLL is 'how' and FFS is 'what' is being written. FFS uses all 512 bytes available in a disk sector, while the older system use only 488 bytes of the 512 for data and the other 24 bytes for pointers and the like. With the old system, the Amiga had to read in a sector, extract the 488 bytes from the 512 read and then move that data into memory. With FFS, the Amiga can read the whole 512 bytes right into memory with no intermediate steps. (that's a simplistic explanation…but it is basicaly what happens). RLL vs MFM is strictly between the controller and the disk…nothing at all to do with how the Amiga handles the data or not. In fact, RLL and MFM are used across all PCs, not just the Amiga. Don
#123650From: pam smithMay 10, 1988 10:55 PM
Thanks for explaining. I knew that RLL and MFM were common across the PC systems, I, however, did not understand how FFS fit in to the system. Thanks for the explanation. Now I can be a bit more knowledgeable while shopping for my hard drive.
#123650From: pam smithMay 10, 1988 10:55 PM
Thanks for explaining. I knew that RLL and MFM were common across the PC systems, I, however, did not understand how FFS fit in to the system. Thanks for the explanation. Now I can be a bit more knowledgeable while shopping for my hard drive.
#123503From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 10, 1988 2:15 AM
RLL and FFS are completely separate issues. RLL is the method of writing data to the disk, and FFS the way the data is sent to the disk. In other words, RLL is 'how' and FFS is 'what' is being written. FFS uses all 512 bytes available in a disk sector, while the older system use only 488 bytes of the 512 for data and the other 24 bytes for pointers and the like. With the old system, the Amiga had to read in a sector, extract the 488 bytes from the 512 read and then move that data into memory. With FFS, the Amiga can read the whole 512 bytes right into memory with no intermediate steps. (that's a simplistic explanation…but it is basicaly what happens). RLL vs MFM is strictly between the controller and the disk…nothing at all to do with how the Amiga handles the data or not. In fact, RLL and MFM are used across all PCs, not just the Amiga. Don