CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Hot News & Rumors

#AutoCAD to Amiga !

19 messages in this thread
#125834From: Joel HalbertMay 22, 1988 12:40 AM
OK John, fine. I only gave you my views. What you do now is your business (literally). But I don't accept the argument about development costs justifying a high price. Don't you think that every good quality commercial program involves a large expenditure of time and resources? Every product is priced based on certain factors. Manufactured products, (automobiles, IC's, appliances, computers) have to have their prices set at a minimum break-even point plus whatever the market will bear. And it's all based on price elasticity, etc. If you spent $5000 developing the program, and you sell it for (say) $500, then you only have to sell a dozen or two copies to justify the cost. And maybe that's all you will sell – I don't know. Would you sell hundreds of copies at $50? I don't know that either. If you don't think that my views are representative of your potential customore base, then ignore them. But _you_ asked the question. I am a professional. I use the Amiga for both professional and non-professional purposes, but it's virtually all on my own budget, due to reasons I'd like to change but can't change so easily. I design very sophisticated products and talk to customers. Some of them can't pay for the product at the price we must charge, so we work with them to suggest other solutions. I have never preached or lectured a customer because he can't or won't pay the price. Your question indicated that you were trying to do market research, but your reply back to me indicates you've already made up your mind. I'm sorry if I'm overreacting here, but the tone of your message sparked these thoughts. Anyway, I'm still glad that you are working on these utilities, and good luck with your whatever marketing strategy you choose.
#125838From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 12:47 AM
$5000.00 to develop a program? It's only a couple of hundred byte program, I assume, then. Not a _real_ program, right? Not one that takes 100's –> 1000's of hours to do? I don't know about YOU, but I only know a few _good_ programmers; and they get more than $5/hour. Actually, they _should_ be getting in the area of 25$/hour at a _minimum_. Hard to price a program at 29.95 under those circumstances, unless you can sell one to everyone and you have no overhead. –Ben–
#125853From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 22, 1988 1:06 AM
Gee Ben…you ought to hire yourself out…you'd make a lot of money at $25/hr for custom programming because that's cheap! Every place around here doing custom programming is paying the programmer a minimum of $40/hr for custom programming! In fact, the city just hired a company to do a bit of work for us and their rates are from $80 to $125/hr.
#125937From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 4:45 PM
Don – I wasn't talking about custom programming – I was talking about programming for a living, in a steady job, with benefits, and so forth. $100.00 an hour is moderate for one-shot custom work. –Ben–
#125937From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 4:45 PM
Don – I wasn't talking about custom programming – I was talking about programming for a living, in a steady job, with benefits, and so forth. $100.00 an hour is moderate for one-shot custom work. –Ben–
#125853From: Don Curtis/SYSOPMay 22, 1988 1:06 AM
Gee Ben…you ought to hire yourself out…you'd make a lot of money at $25/hr for custom programming because that's cheap! Every place around here doing custom programming is paying the programmer a minimum of $40/hr for custom programming! In fact, the city just hired a company to do a bit of work for us and their rates are from $80 to $125/hr.
#125861From: Joel HalbertMay 22, 1988 2:27 AM
John was telling me about the equipment he bought to develop the program, which came to several thousand dollars (maybe more than $5K). If that was only a tiny fraction of the development cost for his DXF conversion module, then he shouldn't have brought up the equipment cost. Remember, Ben – John was talking to me about this module for Interchange. Without belittling the effort it takes to do _any_ program correctly, I don't think that it's in the same category as writing a layout package from scratch.
#125903From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:23 PM
Maybe that means that Ben priced his software too low. InterChange is different than other programs in some respects – because it is modular, I'm continually working on tools to manipulate and translate objects. I've got a dozen other modules working in-house, waiting to be marketed. Marketing costs money. Everything I write, every ounce of sweat into InterChange is part of the development cost of this AutoCAD module.
#125903From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:23 PM
Maybe that means that Ben priced his software too low. InterChange is different than other programs in some respects – because it is modular, I'm continually working on tools to manipulate and translate objects. I've got a dozen other modules working in-house, waiting to be marketed. Marketing costs money. Everything I write, every ounce of sweat into InterChange is part of the development cost of this AutoCAD module.
#125938From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 4:47 PM
I have _no_ idea, and wouldn't presume, for that reason. –Ben–
#125938From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 4:47 PM
I have _no_ idea, and wouldn't presume, for that reason. –Ben–
#125861From: Joel HalbertMay 22, 1988 2:27 AM
John was telling me about the equipment he bought to develop the program, which came to several thousand dollars (maybe more than $5K). If that was only a tiny fraction of the development cost for his DXF conversion module, then he shouldn't have brought up the equipment cost. Remember, Ben – John was talking to me about this module for Interchange. Without belittling the effort it takes to do _any_ program correctly, I don't think that it's in the same category as writing a layout package from scratch.
#125904From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:24 PM
The $5K was just the hardware and software cost to upgrade my AT to AutoCAD. It didn't account for paying me, or advertising, etc. which was my entire point.
#125946From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 5:01 PM
I know – I've been there. –Ben–
#125946From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 5:01 PM
I know – I've been there. –Ben–
#125904From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:24 PM
The $5K was just the hardware and software cost to upgrade my AT to AutoCAD. It didn't account for paying me, or advertising, etc. which was my entire point.
#125838From: Ben BlishMay 22, 1988 12:47 AM
$5000.00 to develop a program? It's only a couple of hundred byte program, I assume, then. Not a _real_ program, right? Not one that takes 100's –> 1000's of hours to do? I don't know about YOU, but I only know a few _good_ programmers; and they get more than $5/hour. Actually, they _should_ be getting in the area of 25$/hour at a _minimum_. Hard to price a program at 29.95 under those circumstances, unless you can sell one to everyone and you have no overhead. –Ben–
#125905From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:24 PM
"I don't know" isn't good enough for me. I need hard facts and reasoning. I know I need to do more than "pay for costs" if I'm to stay in business in this market niche. If you're going to make money and get value from my product, shouldn't we trade value for value? How much value will you get from my converter?
#125905From: John FoustMay 22, 1988 1:24 PM
"I don't know" isn't good enough for me. I need hard facts and reasoning. I know I need to do more than "pay for costs" if I'm to stay in business in this market niche. If you're going to make money and get value from my product, shouldn't we trade value for value? How much value will you get from my converter?