CompuServe Thread

#Poor A1200 HD Performanc

6 messages in this thread
#132831From: ALAN SMITHFeb 19, 1994 10:38 PM
My A1200's hard drive speed measures only about 200k It's a Seagate 2.5" internal about 210megs. This performance is totally aweful ! Is there another plug in IDE controller out there with better performance ?
#132877From: Jonathan SchmidtFeb 20, 1994 8:28 AM
Alan, I have the same drive and the exact same performance. I usually don't go by the tests, though. First thing to do is get yourself a good cache program. This will make a BIG difference. Second, you have to remember that the IDE controller is processor dependent so on an '020, you won't get as fast throughput as you would on a faster machine. At least in theory that is correct. There is not at this time another IDE controller available for the 1200. I suggest keeping your 200 meg internally and add a SCSI contoller such as the GVP (with or with out the accellerator) and get a good external HD. Jonathan Schmidt – On AutoPilot from CompuServe Land
#132934From: Robert ComerFeb 20, 1994 5:05 PM
Unfotunately, a faster processor doesn't help the slow transfer times for the bigger Seagate 2.5 IDE drives… The interface is not the problem, it's the slightly nonstandard Seagate coupled a bit of wierdness on the part of the IDE driver… My 120M seagate is has roughly the same performance as Alan's, and I have a 50Mhz '030 Amiga 1200. Bob Comer — Flying high and fast with my A1200HD'030 on Autopilot! From Cheyenne, Wyoming U.S.A.
#133018From: Jonathan SchmidtFeb 21, 1994 8:02 AM
Hmmm…. then I'm stumped… Jonathan Schmidt – On AutoPilot from CompuServe Land
#133364From: Paul ToalFeb 23, 1994 2:39 AM
The little Seagate 2.5 was made to go slow. Notebook users are cursing thing all over the place. It's the nature of the beast.
#133857From: ALAN SMITHFeb 26, 1994 5:26 AM
Thanks for the info ! (Seagate Sucks ! 🙂 ) -Alan