CompuServe Thread

#Production for profit?

14 messages in this thread
#39136From: Allen EdmondsFeb 25, 1994 8:51 PM
S.O.S!! I'm a freelance writer doing a series for Video Toaster User magazine on small business opportunities with the toaster. One of the stories I'm working on involves program production for local cable access channels. The Cable Act of 1992 appears to open up some real avenues for profit here. Is anyone out there looking into this opportunity? According to the new law, we're not just talking non-profit Wayne and Garth stuff — you can actually lease time and sell ads, or use your programming to sell a product or service. I'm just having a hard time finding anyone who can tell me whether they've looked into this, and what their experiences have been. Let me know if you're out there!! Thanks, Allen Edmonds
#39190From: James R. OllickFeb 26, 1994 7:49 PM
I don't think that the public is informed of this. The cable TV company here hasn't had inquiries. They have a Toaster setup and a Matrox unit.
#39201From: Jonathan HirschmanFeb 27, 1994 1:27 AM
Could you elaborate on this, or at least point me where I could find some more info? I haven't heard about this (wonder why not :), and would like some more info.
#39258From: Allen EdmondsFeb 28, 1994 11:45 AM
This concept has actually been around for quite some time. The 1984 Act required cable systems with more than 36 channels to set aside a certain percentage of those channels for lease to programmers (leased commercial access, as opposed to community or public access, as I originally described it). No. 1, many cable systems that I'm familiar with have 36 or less channels, and no. 2, there weren't enough safety valves to prevent cable companies from setting exorbitant rates or making unreasonable demands. The 92 Act attempted to solve some of these problems by assigning rate-setting and oversight power to the FCC (we'll see how THAT works). This is described in Section 7 of the Senate version of the Act, the version that eventually passed. Allen
#39281From: Jonathan HirschmanFeb 28, 1994 9:33 PM
Allen, Even more fascinating. Where can I get more information about this? Jonathan
#39314From: Allen EdmondsMar 1, 1994 5:28 PM
Stay tuned. You may have missed my original message. I'm doing a story for Video Toaster User on this subject, and I was looking in the forum for anyone who might be doing it. At this point, you probably know as much as I do, i.e., Congress is forcing open the doorway, and the possibilities seem to range from Cable Classifieds to independent program production whereby you go out and sell spots to finance the venture. It may not be as simple as I'm making it sound (things rarely are), but that's what I aim to find out. The story is tentatively slated for May or June, I believe. Allen
#39461From: Wayne ColeMar 3, 1994 11:00 PM
… and shortly after it passed, they increased my rates to comply with the rates in the law, and took all the radio stations off the cable so the second outlet that I was paying for became useless – unless I want to spend another 7 bucks a month for a box to decode the digitized radio dignals back to analog for my radio… Thanks Washington, for looking out for me AGAIN! wmc – via Autopilot!
#39476From: Karl F. KugelMar 4, 1994 1:16 AM
Of course. "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you." <G>
#39534From: Brian BartlettMar 5, 1994 3:57 AM
naw, you have to get the quote right. Jim Wright, "We're goin' to he'p you." <g>.
#39633From: Karl F. KugelMar 6, 1994 11:16 PM
No, from Jim the quote was "We're goin' to he'p ourselves." <G> He seems to have he'ped himself to quite a bit. . . -Karl Speaking from the Rubble.
#39636From: Brian BartlettMar 7, 1994 2:13 AM
Karl, ah! You could hear what he was mumbling when he said that. Guess I need a hearing aid <g>. "You do trust me, don't you? Of course you do." — "To Play the King" (BBC)
#39208From: Wayne ColeFeb 27, 1994 6:41 AM
In my area the community access channel is governed byt the city council (who somwhow 'owns' it as part of the local cable company licensing deal). They do not permit users to make money on it. It supposed to be available for free expression of the community who would otherwise lack access to mass media to disemminate thier views. At least that is the myth that is pedalled here…
#39237From: Ron LegroFeb 27, 1994 11:19 PM
The idea behind public or community access is not for profit. An access production facility might be willing to lease Toaster gear or hire a Toaster expert to produce bumpers or whatever, but more likely it'd buy the gear and let the amateur producers do with it what they can. You may instead be thinking of leased access, which is for profit. I know of small production outfits that tried to make money producing local programming and commercials to be seen on leased access channels. One of 'em used a Toaster setup. This was several years ago! I've lost track of all this stuff, though.
#39257From: Allen EdmondsFeb 28, 1994 11:36 AM
You're right, I misstated it. It's called leased commercial access, and it's covered in Section 7 of the 92 Cable Act. Thanks! Allen