CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Help/Announcements

#Atari ST/Amiga survey

5 messages in this thread
#25172From: SYSOP*Tom HudsonJul 3, 1986 5:38 PM
Thanks for the comments, Mike. It is true that computers that are seen as being in direct competition by their users can produce fierce battles between the users, and the ST and Amiga are no exception. The key element here is the PERCEPTION of the users. I see a lot of Amiga users saying that the ST is not competition for the Amiga, and a lot of ST users saying the opposite. This is also reflected in the ads by both companies, which irritated the ST users because they felt the ST should have been listed in the comparison charts! Both computers are 68000-based and graphics-oriented, ergo leaving the ST out of the comparisons was a "cheap shot". This resulted in a rather poor atmosphere between Atari and Amiga owners trying to play the "my computer is better than your computer" game. Seeing my ST artwork show up in Amiga store demos with my signature removed and the store clerk claiming it was done on the Amiga has not endeared me to the Amiga either. There are a lot of bruised feelings on both sides, and the sooner everyone gets their act together and gets down to work, leaving the petty arguments behind, the better things will be for both machines. I also want to point out that my original request for responses was NOT a "my computer is better than your computer"-type thing but an opinion poll to get a feeling for the varied marketing and support strategies.
#25225From: Larry Phillips/ICUGJul 4, 1986 12:19 AM
Unfortunately Tom, with the attitude of the people who take potshots at the Amiga, and their seeming total belief that the Amiga is just an ST with perhaps better graphics and sound, it becomes very difficult indeed to say anything about the two computers (and the respective companies) without getting a little rabid. The last sales pitch I got for the ST was more of an unsell of the Amiga, with ammunition apparently pulled out of thin air and with no basis in fact. That's basically why I chose not to answer your questions.
#25225From: Larry Phillips/ICUGJul 4, 1986 12:19 AM
Unfortunately Tom, with the attitude of the people who take potshots at the Amiga, and their seeming total belief that the Amiga is just an ST with perhaps better graphics and sound, it becomes very difficult indeed to say anything about the two computers (and the respective companies) without getting a little rabid. The last sales pitch I got for the ST was more of an unsell of the Amiga, with ammunition apparently pulled out of thin air and with no basis in fact. That's basically why I chose not to answer your questions.
#25243From: Geoff SoardJul 4, 1986 1:07 AM
First let me compliment you on your fine work for the Atari ST. I sell both the Atari and Amiga lines, and have found your DEGAS and CAD-3D packages to be very nicely written. I have some views on the Amiga/ST struggle which you may be interested in. Please read my message #25241 on the subject. I have had some disgruntled folks on both sides of the situation, but I sort of view the two machines in the same perspective as the Commodore 64 versus Apple II in the 8-bit market. People who seem to be more concerned about image and less about price have chosen Apple for home use (lets ignore for now the obvious applications software advantage of the Apple since many Apples are used merely for games as are the 64's). Those same type of people seem to buy Amigas based on what appears to be a more professionally built machine (whether it is or not is a matter of opinion, but the machine has a substantially more expensive look and feel to it – and the price tag to go with that feel). The Commodore 64 type owner seems to be concerned more with price/performance. In other words, how much can I do for a set amount of money. These people also perceive the Atari ST as the better machine due to its lower price (while retaining great power), and its somewhat of a head start in software development. Like the 64, the ST seems to be the next major MASS MARKET machine. They may soon sell at KMart the way the 64 sold a short time ago. The Amiga will still have its followers, but I do think they will always be a bit more selective, and a smaller group. I'd be interested to hear your input. Thanks for listening, see ya…
#25243From: Geoff SoardJul 4, 1986 1:07 AM
First let me compliment you on your fine work for the Atari ST. I sell both the Atari and Amiga lines, and have found your DEGAS and CAD-3D packages to be very nicely written. I have some views on the Amiga/ST struggle which you may be interested in. Please read my message #25241 on the subject. I have had some disgruntled folks on both sides of the situation, but I sort of view the two machines in the same perspective as the Commodore 64 versus Apple II in the 8-bit market. People who seem to be more concerned about image and less about price have chosen Apple for home use (lets ignore for now the obvious applications software advantage of the Apple since many Apples are used merely for games as are the 64's). Those same type of people seem to buy Amigas based on what appears to be a more professionally built machine (whether it is or not is a matter of opinion, but the machine has a substantially more expensive look and feel to it – and the price tag to go with that feel). The Commodore 64 type owner seems to be concerned more with price/performance. In other words, how much can I do for a set amount of money. These people also perceive the Atari ST as the better machine due to its lower price (while retaining great power), and its somewhat of a head start in software development. Like the 64, the ST seems to be the next major MASS MARKET machine. They may soon sell at KMart the way the 64 sold a short time ago. The Amiga will still have its followers, but I do think they will always be a bit more selective, and a smaller group. I'd be interested to hear your input. Thanks for listening, see ya…