CompuServe test bed

CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Products & Reviews

#XMODM3.MLL vs. Telcom.C

3 messages in this thread
#88068From: Bruce WilsonAug 5, 1985 6:35 AM
Marty, Thanx for reply. You mentioned CISTRN…is that a better telecom package than xmodem? **Bruce**
#88085From: Sysop Dave ThomasAug 5, 1985 2:22 PM
Bruce: CISTRN.100 is not as flexible as XMODEM.312 and doesn't have the bells and whistles of the latter. It uses CompuServe A file transfer protocol and does not allow downloading with plain Telcom. Unlike the XMODEM series for the Model 100, Tandy 200, and NEC 8201A the CISTRN.100 program is machine language. For about a year, it was the only protocol transfer program available for the Model 100. Lotza fun … SIGing the 100 way … .^Dave^.
#88085From: Sysop Dave ThomasAug 5, 1985 2:22 PM
Bruce: CISTRN.100 is not as flexible as XMODEM.312 and doesn't have the bells and whistles of the latter. It uses CompuServe A file transfer protocol and does not allow downloading with plain Telcom. Unlike the XMODEM series for the Model 100, Tandy 200, and NEC 8201A the CISTRN.100 program is machine language. For about a year, it was the only protocol transfer program available for the Model 100. Lotza fun … SIGing the 100 way … .^Dave^.