CompuServe Thread

#DNA & Stonehnge builders

4 messages in this thread
#167056From: Rick McQuayFeb 10, 1995 9:12 AM
Re: Mitochodrial DNA I may have read this or at least similiar articles a while back while writing a paper about mDNA research and ancient asian migrations to the americas. Very interesting. The conflicts I spoke of between paleoanthropologists and geneticists arise from the estimation of the time period that the human branch seperated from other hominids. I don't remember the details, and I don't have my notes (having just moved). You may be familiar with it however. In any case, I love a good uproar between biology and anthropology. Myself believeing that biology is a "harder" science. (no flames please) <g>
#167089From: Greg LadenFeb 10, 1995 4:00 PM
>> In any case, I love a good uproar between biology and anthropology. Myself believeing that biology is a "harder" science. (no flames please) <g> << Wooooossshhh (that was the flame lighting up) I'm a biological anthropologist, and our stuff is at least as hard as any biologists! Cheers, GTL
#167209From: Rick McQuayFeb 11, 1995 9:36 AM
>> Wooooossshhh (that was the flame lighting up) I'm a biological anthropologist, and our stuff is at least as hard as any biologists!<< Ooops! Guess you're right. Well, it's just that many anthropologists I have met (mostly paleo kind) use their bones and so forth as gospel and sneer at some new genetic methods that contradict older theories. Not as familiar with biological anthropology, give me a quick rundown on your speciality. BTW, don't get me wrong, I think anthropology is facinating. It is just some of the practicioners I am wary of. The "hard" <g> evidence of bone fragments is compelling, but there is too much uncertainty (IMHO) to sneer at other sciences.
#167243From: Greg LadenFeb 11, 1995 12:58 PM
Rick My feeling at this time is that those who still maintain bone-based phylogenies in the face of molecular data are not numerous and are clearly not in a position to gain much respect from the rest of the field. On the other hand, it is also becomming clear that the dna evidence has the same problems that modern mophological evidence has, in many ways! And, as yet, we can't look at hominid radiations with DNA… My own field is human evolution, esp. the evolution of human foraging ecology. Cheers, GTL Greg Laden Dept. of Anthropology Harvard University Cambridge MA 02138