#Multiple PRJ render?
2 messages in this thread
JNJ, you may want to consider getting OS/2 2.11 on your machine. With it,
you can set up TWO instances of 3D Studio that will run at the same time. One
will be in the background running as a Slave Renderer, while the other runs in
the foreground full-screen allowing you to model projects while others are
rendering! When you're not actively using the foreground task or doing
anything else, the background task will actually render almost as fast as it
would on an identical machine running single-user MS-DOS! In some cases (those
which would require Phar Lap swapping under MS-DOS), they'll actually render
somewhat FASTER! Even when you ARE using the foreground task, the background
will still render at a pretty good clip, allowing you to get some rendering
done while you're working!
I recommend OS/2 2.11 instead of the newer OS/2 3.0 Warp because the
latter's optimizations for space (to run on 4MB RAM machines) was done at the
expense of speed. Warp FEELS faster because IBM boosted the priority of
user-interface threads (such as redrawing of windows, etc.) to make the
user-interface respond "snappier," again at the expense of actual performance
of actual "work" tasks. As a result, Warp is noticeably and in some cases
significantly SLOWER than 2.11 in actual work performance, even though it
"feels" faster. OS/2 SMP woudl be even better, of course, but for the price
you'd pay for a good SMP multi-Pentium CPU you could buy an equivalent number
of separate Pentium machines and network 'em.
Gosh, this was an old post.. 😉
I actually have OS/2 installed for exact that reason- but don't use it! I
haven't used it in a long time, but haven't messed with deleting it due to the
dual partition hassle. The way I have it set up, It'd take too much hassle to
change. (all my drive letters and paths would be messed up) I'll be getting a
big dual pentium system within the month or so, and will be running NT3.5, and
(unfortunately) dos for 3DS. NT's alot better IMHO, and actually has programs
in native form I'd run. (unlike os/2) I believe I've given OS/2 a fair shake,
and find it lacking. Mabe IBM will release Taligent, and it'll sweep the
world, but until then, it's Microsoft all the way for me. (well, until I find
a must-have program on the Mac, or can justify an Indigo 2 Extreme and Alias)
I'm glad you like OS/2 though. Somebody needs to fund Microsoft's competition.
🙂
JNJ