CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Off the Cuff

#Amiga Radio Net

7 messages in this thread
#87502From: Kathy WehrOct 4, 1987 10:16 AM
An Amiga Amateur Radio Net has been organized. Anyone interested in exchanging ideas about Amiga computers is welcome. AmigaNet sked is every Tuesday Evening at 7:00 PM (EDT), 23:00 GMT, frequency is 3882 khz + or – for QRM. AmigaNet control is Doug, NG2G. A 20 meter AmigaNet may be formed also, contact Doug or I, if interested in particapating or helping in it. Doug can be reached via packet @ AI2Q. 73, Kathy WB3KRN (WB3KRN @ K3RLI for packet mail)
#87542From: Ben BlishOct 4, 1987 4:18 PM
Just a comment… 3882 Khz is a terrible choice for a national net. First of all, those frequencies are Noisy… incredibly so. Second, That band requires the biggest antenna (read expensive/cumbersome/ LARGE) and therefor includes the smallest number of HAMs. For instance, there is a lo9cal group of hams here in South Florida, about 20 of us with Amigas. Nobody uses 80 meters, as the antennas are far too large to be implemented in a suburban area. EVeryone, without exception, has 20 meter capability. Some have 40, too… On 80, the only thing anyone has are stick antennas, which aren't worth their weight in IBM pcs. (read, Worthless) or Basic programs (read Wirthless) Anyway, were there a 20 meter net, you would _certainly_ have a larger group. 80? Sheesh! –Ben–
#87588From: New memberOct 4, 1987 9:52 PM
Ben Im suprised! You waste 20 meters with local stuff! Shame shame. Whats wrong with VHF? Ive been having more fun on 6 meters and 220 than Ill ever have listening to maniacs on HF arguing over 5KHZ of 20! Faxing on 220FM when it was the lowest freq allowed showed me how much fun the wide open spaces could be. And 6 never stops amazing me. Aroura E Skip etc. Check it out if you havent. But Ill bet you are there already. CU Later Jay
#87626From: Ben BlishOct 5, 1987 12:37 AM
Yeah, I'm there — and we don't really use 20 for 'local'. My buddies have calls like ZR6BTD — and we send video, both SSTV and FAX on 14230 and 14233 with great regularity. Also to the south pole. Local? <grin>. I use VHF for packet (see Packcomm.arc in DL4… pd packet term program for the Amiga, PD Software from SoftCircuits and me, N4EJI) My comment was for a national net on the AMiga… read back through the thread to see what I was getting at –Ben–
#87626From: Ben BlishOct 5, 1987 12:37 AM
Yeah, I'm there — and we don't really use 20 for 'local'. My buddies have calls like ZR6BTD — and we send video, both SSTV and FAX on 14230 and 14233 with great regularity. Also to the south pole. Local? <grin>. I use VHF for packet (see Packcomm.arc in DL4… pd packet term program for the Amiga, PD Software from SoftCircuits and me, N4EJI) My comment was for a national net on the AMiga… read back through the thread to see what I was getting at –Ben–
#87588From: New memberOct 4, 1987 9:52 PM
Ben Im suprised! You waste 20 meters with local stuff! Shame shame. Whats wrong with VHF? Ive been having more fun on 6 meters and 220 than Ill ever have listening to maniacs on HF arguing over 5KHZ of 20! Faxing on 220FM when it was the lowest freq allowed showed me how much fun the wide open spaces could be. And 6 never stops amazing me. Aroura E Skip etc. Check it out if you havent. But Ill bet you are there already. CU Later Jay
#87542From: Ben BlishOct 4, 1987 4:18 PM
Just a comment… 3882 Khz is a terrible choice for a national net. First of all, those frequencies are Noisy… incredibly so. Second, That band requires the biggest antenna (read expensive/cumbersome/ LARGE) and therefor includes the smallest number of HAMs. For instance, there is a lo9cal group of hams here in South Florida, about 20 of us with Amigas. Nobody uses 80 meters, as the antennas are far too large to be implemented in a suburban area. EVeryone, without exception, has 20 meter capability. Some have 40, too… On 80, the only thing anyone has are stick antennas, which aren't worth their weight in IBM pcs. (read, Worthless) or Basic programs (read Wirthless) Anyway, were there a 20 meter net, you would _certainly_ have a larger group. 80? Sheesh! –Ben–