Dear John,
I have Level II-ver. 3.01. Yes, the menus make the interface
better, but the program should have always had menus. I don't like the
event list as the sole means of editing. I prefer graphic and numeric
editing. I also use M for algorithmic composition, but it's not a
sequencer.
I'm curious. You state you weren't impressed with the MTPro demo.
Do you dislike being able to draw in your Midi controller data? B&P also
offers this feature. What about tempo mapping? With B&P, you can draw in a
tempo curve and then use the magnifying glass to fine tune it if necessary.
Why do you prefer to enter numbers with KCS?
There is a module with KCS called "Mix Master". It's an automated
Midi mixer that was written by David Silver from scratch, I believe. It
doesn't borrow from the outdated KCS concepts. I think it is very good. It
utilizes graphic sliders and other icons. It's totally different from the
KCS interface, so that's why I probably like it. Dom Fontana