#Anim to Mac conversion
30-Apr-95 20:44:54
Sb: #46705-#Anim to Mac conversion
Fm: Rick Figley 73537,420
To: LEPIDO R VARGAS 73004,2174
Hi Lepido,
No, actually I don't have a Mac, I've got a 2000 with the Gforce 030
at 40 Mhz, 2 meg of chip and 6 meg of fast RAM. What is XV? I want to
take anims from DPaint and convert them for viewing on the Mac. Also
want to do the same for the PC. From what I understand Image FX will
do that for FLI/FLC formats in any resolution. I have Image Master
but i think that can only do it in lo-res. My purpose is to create
pictures and animations for use in Demo disks and MultiMedia
applications. I'm doing some 3D also in Lightwave, but I just do
simple stuff that I load the frames into Brilliance to create anim
files with it. At first I was disappointed to hear about the release
of DP5 soon after getting Brilliance. But from what I've read in the
forum here. It seems that Brilliance was the way to go. From what I
read about DPaint 5 it sounded like they had implemented alot of the
animation features that Brilliance was smart enough to put in. My
problem is that I'm so used to the Dpaint interface I've found
Brilliance ackward, and have gotten frustrated, and gone back to what
I know in DPaint. I had discovered a couple features DP 4 has that
Brillinace does not such as Anim Fill. There was something else that
I kind of did alot of in DP that Brilliance wouldn't do but I can't
remember what. But from what I've read from others, I seem to be the
only one complaining about these differences. I will say however I
have found Brilliance excellent when it comes to loading 24 bit
images and reducing them to 16 colors. Also the text feature is
excellent and makes it very easy to do quick titling. Also the ability
to load a sequence of frames to create an anim file is a breeze
compared to ADPro or Anim Workshop. I quess I shouldn't complain
about it too much since the things I've just mentioned are almost
worth the price of it alone. Although the first reason I got it was
for it's infamous speed which I did not find to be that great except
for in a couple of functions. But I understand some of my limitations
being in my 2000. I understand it is much better in AGA machines.
Back to my conversion to Mac files. I don't think I need to write to a
Mac disk since Macs can read PC disks and I've got Cross Dos for
that. Besides I think uploading to a Mac, which is probably what I'll
be doing would solve that problem as well. I've heard of Mac using
Quicktime. Is that the only anim format for Mac? Not sure what you
mean by the datafork? also, what is AMICDFS. Is MacConvert shareware
or commercial software?
As you can see, I'm a little confused.
Rick