#FCC Access charge
14-Jun-87 00:59:36
Sb: #71973-#FCC Access charge
Fm: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
To: Dick tenEyck-BCS 76004,1025
This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.
My response is:
1. By adding a $5/hr/user access fee to simply connect to a
network, the FCC is for all practical purposes, eliminating the vast
majority of private users from these services (such as CIS). $6/hr access,
suddenly becomes $11/hr access and $12/hr access suddenly becomes $17/hr
access…with the users paying the fees. Considering the baud rates and
hourly rates…it would just be way too much for most private users
(non-corporate users).
2. The FCC only imposes a $1/month access fee for residential
access to the long distance networks, and that fee will rise to about
$5/month…why should access to network services cost $5/hr when long
distance is only $5/month…a difference of 720 times the rate or a 72,000%
increase for essentially the same service (the ability to connect with a
distant location).
3. Deregulation and the break-up of AT&T was supposed to make
services more competitive, not eliminate them.
4. Corporate services such as VISA use nationwide networks for such
things as credit verification/stolen card checks. Since by it's very
nature, it must be a 24hr a day operation, imposing a $5/hr connect fee
would increase their costs per line by $3,600/month or $43,000/year and
that cost would be passed on to the consumer. I suspect they have at least
1,000 lines around the US, thus for that one service alone, would cost the
consumer 43 Million dollars a year.
5. The present system works! Why mess with it? It doesn't cost
the local BOC's 1 cent extra to provide hook up to a network once it's
installed. Charge for the installation…but once installed, leave it
alone!
6. Etc.