#040-25 vs. 486-50 ???
26-Jun-93 12:41:17
Sb: #59158-#040-25 vs. 486-50 ???
Fm: john meggie 70353,2367
To: Charles Blaquiere 76046,1756
Charles, I thought I would comment on Real 3D 2.0 since you asked users to
respond. I have tried most of the advanced features and they all have worked
for me. The manual is quite extensive with numerous tutorials and a complete
reference section. The index needs more detail, however. Rendering times can
be slow if detailed B-Spline objects are used, but I don't find them
exceedingly slow on my '040. And the rendering of these objects is stunning.
The smoothest, non-faceted stuff you ever saw. Much better than Phong shaded
objects, but slower to render. The interface is weird at first but it can be
customized to absolutely anything you want, once you figure it out. I now find
it reasonably intuitive but not a Lightwave in GUI. It is not overly difficult
to achieve the advanced features but the manual has to be followed very
closely. It is a complex program with stratospheric potential. I think most of
the people having difficulty with the advanced stuff tried to do too much too
fast with out learning the program basics. The program has already been updated
twice on their BBS (the only advantage of having a dongle). Glad to answer any
more questions.
John