DPS/charge for output.
13-Jan-94 03:57:16
Sb: #75961-DPS/charge for output.
Fm: Don Landis 71673,3612
To: John Tissavary 71054,15
>> If your market demands BetaSP quality then the PAR won't do except
as preview device,
When discussing market requirements, John, it is best not to state
such a restriction, Your market will determine what level of beta SP
quality is acceptable. Used to be the only quality was BVW beta then
came the slightly reduced specs of the PVW, now the UVW. If the
market accepts your work on PAR to beta SP and is willing to pay for
it then you have given them beta SP market acceptable quality. This
is not a technical issue it is a matter of what sells. I just don't
think "John Tissavary" can dictate what the market requirements are.
I find what people on this forum have told me what will and what
won't sell has nothing to do with reality. Maybe what you and
others here are really saying is "I hope the market won't accept the
output of the PAR to beta SP because I just spent all that $ on
yesterdays technology and haven't yet recovered my investment." All
I can say is this PAR thing must really be good because it has a lot
of traditionalists making alot of unsubstantiated negative claims
without the basis of experience or fact. I don't mean to be picking
on you, John. It's just that I haven't heard such a rumbling of
misinformation about anything in a long time as this PAR. It's as bad
as the toaster in broadcast. Everybody says it won't do broadcast
quality, however more and more are using it for same.