#Lack of Honor?
02-Sep-86 19:44:44
Sb: #31836-#Lack of Honor?
Fm: Denny Jenkins 70003,2374
To: Steve Ahlstrom 76703,2006
This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.
For those interested, here's the full article from the Washington Post…
Take Advantage of `Shareware,'
But Pay Your Fair Share
By T. R. Reid
Washington Post Staff Writer
Like world peace, honest government, a balanced federal budget, and the
low-cal hot fudge sundae, the concept of "Shareware" is one of those sweet,
sweet dreams that never quite come true.
You may know Shareware by one of its aliases: Freeware, Honorware,
User-Supported Software, etc. But the dream by any other name is just as sweet.
The central idea is a sales transaction that turns the standard rules of
buying and selling upside-down: The buyer, not the seller, sets the price of the
product. Indeed, the buyer of a Shareware program has the right to pay nothing
at all, if he decides the software isn't useful.
There's a semantic distinction to note here. Shareware is not the same thing
as "public domain software." A software program in the public domain is
available for free. Generally, it's a program the author wrote for himself,
found useful and is willing to share.
In the early days of personal computing a decade or so ago, all software was
public domain. As soon as any hacker developed a useful new program, he couldn't
wait to pass it around to everyone else in the tiny community of microcomputer
users.
Then a brilliant young programmer named Bill Gates introduced Capitalism: He
asked people to pay for his software. Because Gates had written the first useful
PC version of the BASIC programming language, lots of people were willing to
pay. Thus was born Gates' personal software firm – a modest little outfit called
Microsoft – and the whole multibillion-dollar PC software industry.
Shareware falls between public domain, or free, software and the decidedly
private domain of big-ticket software houses like Microsoft.
As with the public domain, Shareware programs initially are distributed for
free – through user groups, or, more often, through telephone bulletin-board
systems like CompuServe. But if the user finds the program valuable, he is
honor-bound to pay for it – either the author's suggested price or whatever the
buyer considers fair.
Shareware prices are low – ranging from $5 to $50, for the most part – and
some of the stuff is indeed junk. But many of these programs are markedly better
than the high-priced alternatives in the purely private domain.
In the MS-DOS world, the now-famous PC-WRITE, PC-TALK and PC-FILE, available
on almost every bulletin board, are better than many commercial alternatives
priced at $100 and up, but these Shareware products are priced (for those who
choose to pay) at $35 each. Among the dozens of utility programs available for
MS-DOS machines is the wonderful file-compression program called ARC. It will
squeeze any file, or series of files, to a fraction of original size, thus
saving disk storage space and speeding data transfer via modem. The suggested
Shareware price is $15; the program is better than competitors costing 10 times
as much.
There is some wonderful Shareware out for the Macintosh, including Red Ryder,
which is simply the most powerful modem program available for the Mac. With
commercial software development still lagging for the Atari ST and Commodore's
Amiga, the public domain and Shareware are still the most important sources for
many basic utility programs.
The principle of Shareware is so appealing that it ought to be extended to
other fields of commerce. There should be a chain of Shareware Theaters, where
you pay for your ticket on the way out: $10 if the show was great, $5 if fair,
15 cents for an absolute dog. Shareware Hospitals would trust the patient to pay
in proportion to how healthy she felt when she walked out the door.
If Congress were really serious about tax reform, it could create a Shareware
Form 1040, with each household setting its own tax rate based on its evaluation
of how effectively government had operated during the past year.
None of this is likely to happen, though, because the sweet dream of
Shareware isn't working in this hard, cold world. It's not that people don't
like to use Shareware. It's just that they don't like to pay.
A recent McGraw-Hill survey of program authors found that the average rate of
return is about five paying customers for every 2,500 who try the program.
This is a disgraceful reflection on the honor – or lack of same – of the
average personal computer buff. We know of Shareware authors whose batting
average is higher, but the fact remains that nobody is getting rich on
Shareware.
You owe it to yourself to check out the Shareware that's available. If you
do, you owe it to your conscience to fulfill the obligations of honor and pay
your share.