CompuServe Messages

If it's the review that ran in Computer Shopper several months ago, you should know that it was somewhat biased. Performance of both systems was tabulated, and the Wedge came out a sorry second. Why? Because the Palomax was driving an RLL drive, the Wedge an MFM (which accounts for a 50% speed increase right there). Actually, "biased" is too strong a word. At that point in time, the Palomax did have better software support, and initially the Wedge was NOT recommended for RLL drives. Considering the lead time required for a national magazine, it's probable the reviewer was working on the best facts he/she had at the time. Anyway, I mentioned the Wedge in response to a 1000 hard drive thread (I THOUGHT… if it was on 2000s, I apologize!); you'll have to ask Larry Phillips about 2000 Wedges, as I don't know.