#Open Letter to CBM
06-Oct-91 13:55:15
Sb: #14939-#Open Letter to CBM
Fm: Black Belt Systems 76004,1771
To: Harold W. Grigdesby 76304,3030
[ continuation ]
I'll probably be running my 68060 at 250 mhz and laughing my way to the
keyboard.
Regarding Purdue being highly regarded, and running Unix, and the former
providing credence to the latter…
I don't buy it. Credit for good work in any particular area should be
awarded only on the basis of that work. If people credit me with being a
quality martial artist because the company's name implies that and we do
other good work (the implication being that Purdue produces quality
graduates, the only measure of a good school that means anything), then
they're reaching. To say that Unix is good, because Purdue is good *and*
they use Unix doesn't follow.
Hey – Unix works. It's an OS, and it's been successfully used to teach many
people many phases of computing. Fine. But it's old, the number of new
coats of paint it's got hasn't made it into a realtime OS, and it's
unlikely to change in the future (again, nodding at Modcomp, who, if you're
not aware, have a realtime Unix).
The premise I'm disagreeing with here is that Unix is significant enough
that the world will want to change to it. I think not. Some big machines,
doing some big things, are running Unix or a close variant. You have to
remember how many machines aren't running Unix – most of them.
And my solid conviction on this point is based upon an inner certainty that
the average user does not, under any circumstances, want to learn anything
new. They dig in their heels and they will not budge. And the threat to a
company when something as major as the OS changes is huge. For that reason,
I think that where Unix is, Unix will stay. Where MSDROSS is, it will stay.
New systems will be run under groups of small machines, netted under some
variant of MSDOS.
That's what I think.
–Ben